Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,587,697 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Cook Ex Rel. Tessier v. Sheriff of Monroe County.


U.S. Appeals Court

VICARIOUS LIABILITY The tort doctrine that imposes responsibility upon one person for the failure of another, with whom the person has a special relationship (such as Parent and Child,  

Cook Ex Rel ex rel. conj. abbreviation for Latin ex relatione, meaning "upon being related" or "upon information," used in the title of a legal proceeding filed by a state attorney general (or the federal Department of Justice) on behalf of the government, on the instigation of . Tessier v. Sheriff of Monroe County, 402 F.3d 1092 (11th Cir. 2005). The personal representative of the estate of a pretrial pre·tri·al  
n.
A proceeding held before an official trial, especially to clarify points of law and facts.

adj.
1. Of or relating to a pretrial.

2.
 detainee de·tain·ee  
n.
A person held in custody or confinement: a political detainee.

Noun 1. detainee - some held in custody
political detainee
 who committed suicide while incarcerated incarcerated /in·car·cer·at·ed/ (in-kahr´ser-at?ed) imprisoned; constricted; subjected to incarceration.

in·car·cer·at·ed
adj.
Confined or trapped, as a hernia.
 brought an action against a sheriff, in his official capacity, asserting claims for deliberate indifference to the detainee's medical needs in violation of [section] 1983, negligent training and supervision of jail employees, and vicarious liability for the employees' negligence. The district court excluded the representative's expert witness testimony, precluded reference to other suicides at the facility, and granted judgment as a matter of law Judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) is a motion made by a party, during trial, claiming the opposing party has insufficient evidence to reasonably support its case. JMOL is similar to summary judgment, which is a motion made before trial.  for the sheriff. The representative appealed. The appeals court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. The appeals court held that the district court acted within its discretion in excluding evidence of other suicides at the jail. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish that the detainee's suicide was foreseeable to the sheriff and therefore any deficiencies in the sheriff's training or supervision did not rise to the level of deliberate indifference. But the court held that evidence was sufficient to support a jury verdict on the plaintiff's claim that the sheriff was vicariously liable under state law for employees' alleged negligence. The court noted that the detainee made two written requests to see a psychiatrist, one on each of the two days immediately preceding his suicide, and that the detainee stated in one request that he was "mentally sick" and asked to see the psychiatrist "as soon as possible." Three deputies observed the detainee as nervous and anxious, and one specifically observed the detainee apparently having an anxiety attack and complaining of chest pains. (Monroe County Detention Center, Florida)
COPYRIGHT 2005 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:respondeat superior, prisoner suicide case
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U5FL
Date:May 1, 2005
Words:284
Previous Article:Brewster v. Nassau County.(Brief Article)
Next Article:Estate of Moreland v. Dieter.(use of force)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
[0] U.S. Appeals Court: MEDICAL CARE.(Brief Article)
Standards.(Brief Article)
Cook Ex Rel. Tessier v. Sheriff of Monroe County.(prisoner suicide case)(Brief Article)
Estate of Sisk v. Manzanares.(FAILURE TO PROTECT)(deliberate indifference to the prisoner's medical needs, violation of civil rights)(Brief Article)
Matos Ex Rel. Matos v. O'Sullivan.(FAILURE TO PROTECT)(eliberate indifference to the prisoner's risk of suicide)(Brief Article)
Coleman Ex Rel. Coleman v. Parkman.(prisoner suicide)(Brief Article)
Wever v. Lincoln County, Nebraska.(FAILURE TO PROTECT)(Brief Article)
Layman Ex Rel. Layman v. Alexander.(MEDICAL CARE)(Brief Article)
Layman Ex Rel. Layman v. Alexander.(PRETRIAL DETENTION)(Brief Article)
Cooper v. Office of Sheriff of Will County.(medical care)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles