Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,607,059 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Contract Law Made Simple Why Consequential Damages Are Dangerous and How to Avoid the Danger


For the sale of goods, the Uniform Commercial Code defines consequential damages as follows:
"Consequential damages resulting from the seller''s breach include

(a) any loss resulting from general or particular requirements and needs of which the seller at the time of contracting had reason to know and which could not reasonably be prevented by cover or otherwise; and

(b) injury to person or property proximately resulting from any breach of warranty."

Keep in mind that paying consequential damages (for example, paying your losses for closing your factory for a month because the seller was late delivering critical machinery) might very well put the seller out of business. That''s why courts are very careful about awarding consequential damages because if they weren''t, people would be very hesitant to enter into contracts with each other because of the huge liability involved.

There are inherent limitations on consequential damages:

(i) The seller must have had reason to know of the "requirements and needs" ? for example, that you need a grinding machine by June 8th or you''ll have to close down your factory. He doesn''t have to actually know, but only have reason to know.

(ii) The seller must have had reason to know at the time of contracting ? so if you make a contract and later tell the seller "You gotta get me the grinding machine by June 8th or I''ll have to close down my factory", you won''t be entitled to consequential damages if he doesn''t (note that you may well be entitled to expectation damages if he breaches the contract, but they''re likely to be a lot less than consequential damages would be).

(iii) The loss must not have been reasonably avoidable ? if the seller told you he couldn''t get the grinding machine to you on time, and you could have bought another, somewhat more expensive one by June 8 but failed to do so, the seller won''t be responsible for your closure of your factory because you failed to mitigate your damages ? in other words, you didn''t do everything you could to minimize your losses. The seller may very well be responsible for the extra money you paid for the more expensive grinding machine.

A later article will discuss clause (b) of the Uniform Commercial Code section cited above.

As a practical matter, though, when writing a sales contract it is always a good idea for a seller to add a disclaimer (in all caps) stating that he is not responsible for any consequential damages.

Courts will honor these clauses in most cases.

DISCLAIMER: The foregoing is intended for reference only and not as legal advice.

Real Estate Law in Plain English explains real estate law without the legalese.

Copyright (c) 2007 Free Online Library
This article can be reproduced subject to these terms. Syndicate this article. More free articles for syndication

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Bob Miles
Publication:Law community
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Dec 13, 2007
Words:479
Previous Article:Limited Liability Company -- Perfect Setup for Small Businesses
Next Article:Efficient Breach ? when You Should Breach Your Contract, and Why the Law Is Designed to Encourage Certain Kinds of Breach



Related Articles
LiveDeal, Inc. Announces Fiscal 2007 Financial Results.
Grandview products' growth is Zetmeir's personal commitment: Grandview Products has achieved significant growth in productivity while maintaining...
Ron Paul's Online Supporters Unite and Rally on Ronspeople.com in Post-Tea Party Success.
Chef's Outfit
Advancements in Technology Ramp Mobility Scooters into the Fast Lane
Why Choosing Landau Uniforms and Scrubs Just Makes Sense

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles