Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,607,059 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Construction tax move is blasted; PROPOSAL: Boss says crackdown on self-employed status is 'absurd'.


Byline: Jenny Waddington

A COVENTRY businessman has branded attempts by the Government to drive 350,000 construction workers from selfemployed to employed status to raise millions in tax revenue as "absurd".

Clive Benfield, chairman of the property firm KB Benfield Group Benfield Group Limited is a reinsurance and risk intermediary based in London, England. It has been listed on the London Stock Exchange since June 2003 and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. , claims the proposed changes will hamper the recovery of the UK's beleaguered be·lea·guer  
tr.v. be·lea·guered, be·lea·guer·ing, be·lea·guers
1. To harass; beset: We are beleaguered by problems.

2. To surround with troops; besiege.
 construction indust r y.

Mr Benfield said: "The attempt by HMRC HMRC Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (UK)
HMRC Health Management Research Center (University of Michigan)
HMRC Helicopter Multi-Role Computer
HMRC Hierarchical Maximal Ratio Combining
 to drive 350,000 workers from self-employed to employed status to raise pounds 350 million per annum Per annum

Yearly.
 in tax revenue is rather absurd when the recession has already caused perhaps 200,000 people to leave the industry.

"The proposals will be another body blow to an industry already suffering badly and likely to see rising unemployment. These proposals should be dropped immediately."

A planned crackdown on the Construction Industry Scheme will mean around 350,000 bricklayers, plumbers, carpenters and plasterers working as sub-contractors will effectively lose their selfemployed status in the eyes of the taxman. While the moves are intended to catch out those who it is believed falsely claim to be selfemployed to reduce their tax liability, experts believe the Government has failed to realise the chaos the new rules would create.

Mr Benfield added: "Bogus selfemployment in the construction industry has been the subject of discussion for as long as I can remember.

However, the systems for taxing workers has been tightened over the years and the Construction Industry Scheme is generally operating satisfactorily.

"The industry needs to employ self-employed people for specialist trades and where they may only be required on site occasionally. This is where agency employment comes into its own, as it would be impossible for a worker to constantly change from direct employment with one employer to the next several times in the same week."
COPYRIGHT 2009 Coventry Newpapers
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2009 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Coventry Evening Telegraph (England)
Date:Sep 11, 2009
Words:295
Previous Article:Back to school for truckers.
Next Article:Inspired celebration.
Topics:



Related Articles
Builders face tax status crackdown.
Tax warning to builders; BUSINESS TODAY.
Blast rocks central Yangon.
Blast rocks central Yangon.
Wales: A FARCICAL WASTE OF TIME.
Apprentices under threat.
Crackdown on bogus self employed; CONSTRUCTING EXCELLENCE.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles