Constant supervision of play unreasonable.
In June this year, the High Court of Australia decided that an
eight-year-old girl injured in the playground had failed to make a case
of negligence against her school. In their judgment, the majority of
judges stated that it was unreasonable to have a system in which
children are observed during particular activities for every single
moment of time: 'It is damaging to teacher-pupil relationships by
removing even the slightest element of trust; it is likely to retard the
development of responsibility in children, and it is likely to call for
a great increase in the number of supervising teachers and in the costs
of providing them' (Sydney Morning Herald, 16/6/05, p.8).
COPYRIGHT 2005 Australian Clearing House for Youth Studies
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
|
Reader Opinion