Confidential records: to share or not to share?Can foreign companies use U.S. courts to get information about American companies not available under the rules of foreign boards? American companies that conduct business overseas can be investigated at any time by agencies in other countries, reported the National Association of Manufacturers, but those agencies often have more limited rules for information gathering than what is allowed in U.S. courts. So if and/or when U.S. companies can be ordered to release confidential records to foreign bodies is far from clear. The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to tackle the issue this year when it hears arguments in the case Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices Inc. The high court recently stepped into a dispute between the two high-tech competitors, agreeing to clarify when U.S. companies can be required to release confidential records to foreign regulators. Intel Corp. is fighting a California appeals court ruling that may force it to release documents to the European Commission European Commission, branch of the governing body of the European Union (EU) invested with executive and some legislative powers. Located in Brussels, Belgium, it was founded in 1967 when the three treaty organizations comprising what was then the European Community , a regulatory board that enforces European Union European Union (EU), name given since the ratification (Nov., 1993) of the Treaty of European Union, or Maastricht Treaty, to the European Community antitrust law antitrust law Any law restricting business practices that are considered unfair or monopolistic. Among U.S. laws, the best known is the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, which declared illegal “every contract, combination…or conspiracy in restraint of trade or . The commission has conducted a preliminary investigation of Intel, based on an antitrust complaint by rival Advanced Micro Devices Inc. The competitor contends that Intel abused its position as the world's leading computer-chip maker to keep other companies from winning market share in Europe. In 2001, Advanced Micro Devices asked a federal judge in California to help them get documents from Intel to give to the European Commission. The judge refused to help in the company's request for documents, which were part of another court case and kept private. But the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco San Francisco (săn frănsĭs`kō), city (1990 pop. 723,959), coextensive with San Francisco co., W Calif., on the tip of a peninsula between the Pacific Ocean and San Francisco Bay, which are connected by the strait known as the Golden said the court had the discretion to order the transfer of records. Seth Waxman, Intel's attorney, said in court filings that the decision allows any foreign company to get information from "its closest commercial rivals simply by asking a foreign enforcement agency to investigate them." Advanced Micro Devices lawyer Patrick Lynch Patrick Lynch can refer to:
Business groups including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is the world's largest not-for-profit federation of businesses, representing more than 3 million businesses and organizations in the United States. As of 2003, the chamber was comprised of 3000 state and local chambers and 830 business associations. and the National Association of Manufacturers are backing Intel's appeal, arguing that the appeals court decision gives foreign companies an opportunity to seek highly sensitive Adj. 1. highly sensitive - readily affected by various agents; "a highly sensitive explosive is easily exploded by a shock"; "a sensitive colloid is readily coagulated" information about policies and strategies of U.S. competitors. According to the Washington Post, the Washington Post, The Morning daily newspaper published in Washington, D.C., the dominant paper in the U.S. capital and one of the nation's leading newspapers. Established in 1877 as a Democratic Party organ, it changed orientation and ownership several times and faced Bush administration has also asked the Supreme Court to review the law that allows federal courts to help people obtain testimony or information for use in foreign or international tribunals. A government lawyer reportedly said the administration does not believe Intel should have to turn over its documents. |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion