Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,558,467 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Concepcion v. Morton.


U.S. Appeals Court

PLRA PLRA Partido Liberal Radical Autentico (Paraguay)
PLRA Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995
 -- Prison Litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute.

When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation.
 Reform Act

EXHAUSTION

Concepcion v. Morton, 306 F.3d 1347 (3rd Cir. 2002). Prisoners brought an action alleging that corrections officials used excessive force in two separate incidents. The district court denied summary judgment for the defendants and they appealed. The appeals court reversed, finding that the exhaustion requirement in the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) applied to the grievance procedure A term used in Labor Law to describe an orderly, established way of dealing with problems between employers and employees.

Through the grievance procedure system, workers' complaints are usually communicated through their union to management for consideration by the employer.
 described in the inmate handbook, even though it had not been formally adopted by the state administrative agency An official governmental body empowered with the authority to direct and supervise the implementation of particular legislative acts. In addition to agency, such governmental bodies may be called commissions, corporations (e.g.  and even though the effectiveness of the handbook's grievance procedure may have been unclear. (New Jersey State Prison)
COPYRIGHT 2003 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:corrections officials used excessive force
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U2NJ
Date:Aug 1, 2003
Words:104
Previous Article:Mayweathers v. Terhune.(violation of rights to free exercise of religion and equal protection)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Davis v. Milwaukee County.(prisoner alleges violation of his right of access to the courts )
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. Appeals Court: RESTRAINTS SEGREGATION.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
U.S. District Court: EXCESSIVE FORCE RESTRAINTS.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
Use of force.(Brief Article)
Services- prisoner.(Brief Article)
Evicci v. Baker.(ACCESS TO COURTS)(Brief Article)
Gailor v. Armstrong.(FAILURE TO PROTECT)(Brief Article)
Gailor v. Armstrong.(excessive force kills prisoner)(Brief Article)
Evicci v. Baker.(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Combs v. Wilkinson.(SAFETY AND SECURITY)(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Atkins v. County of Orange.(HYGIENE-PRISONER PERSONAL)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles