Completing the Record.WRP WRP Wetland Reserve Program WRP Workforce Recruitment Program WRP Workers Revolutionary Party WRP Windows Resource Protection (Microsoft Windows Vista) WRP Wetlands Restoration Program WRP Work Restriction Protection Asia Pacific, formerly Wembley Rubber Products, issued a response to our article in the May issue (page 8), giving an update on the FDA FDA abbr. Food and Drug Administration FDA, n.pr See Food and Drug Administration. FDA, n.pr the abbreviation for the Food and Drug Administration. inspection of its facility in March 1997. A fax from Vice President-QA/RA Y.W. Chow states that after Wembley got a warning letter from FDA on July 29, 1997, "there were substantial communications" between the firm and the agency "with the objective of resolving the issues at hand." He said FDA reinspected the company in November 1997. The agency responded in December that the citations in the 483 were "adequately corrected and that WRP was operating in substantial compliance with GMP GMP (guanosine monophosphate): see guanine. requirements." He said WRP products made after Sept. 12, 1997, would be removed from automatic detention via import alert No. 8904. Inspection Monitor welcomes any firm to provide us with updates on inspections. In the case of foreign audits, it is sometimes difficult due to time differences and language barriers to obtain comments on our articles. We thank Wembley for bringing this news to our attention. Management committed to lowering the microbial microbial pertaining to or emanating from a microbe. microbial digestion the breakdown of organic material, especially feedstuffs, by microbial organisms. limit, the EIR EIR n. popular acronym for environmental impact report, required by many states as part of the application to a county or city for approval of a land development or project. (See: environmental impact report) stated. * Rework re·work tr.v. re·worked, re·work·ing, re·works 1. To work over again; revise. 2. To subject to a repeated or new process. n. procedures. SOPs for visual inspection had no instructions for handling vials in case they were dropped. * Lab records. Lab test data sheets lacked the expected percent variance between duplicate results of protein analysis. * Repeat testing. SOPs for the in-process testing lab did not explain when testing should be re-peated. Despite the recurrent validation problems, there is no record of a second warning letter. Swiss Red Cross Zentrallaboratorium, Bern, Switzerland, 8/5-8/97, Doc. 108660M, $5 plus retrieval. |
|
||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion