Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,607,059 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Competition crux of port's declining grain shipments.


A number of variables have made it difficult for officials to pinpoint the reason why the Thunder Bay Thunder Bay, city (1991 pop. 113,946), SW Ont., Canada, on Thunder Bay inlet of Lake Superior. The city was created in 1970 by the amalgamation of the twin cities of Fort William and Port Arthur and two adjoining townships.  Port Authority's shipment of grain cargo has been declining over the years.

Market shifts, internal and external port competition, location, prairie drought and technological developments in rail have taken chunks out of the Thunder Bay port's market share.

"This is an issue for all Canadian ports. The seaway has so many competitive loads like rail, and now other ports, ... there are all kinds of competing forces," says Tim V. Heney, director of terminal operations The reception, processing, and staging of passengers; thereceipt, transit, storage, and marshalling of cargo; the loadingand unloading of modes of transport conveyances; and themanifesting and forwarding of cargo and passengers todestination. See also operation; terminal.  at the Thunder Bay Port Authority.

At one time, prior to the 1960s, the Keefer Terminal, a facility in the hub of the Thunder Bay port, was the only game in town with the means to handle up to one million tons of general cargo Cargo that is susceptible for loading in general, nonspecialized stowage areas or standard shipping containers; e.g., boxes, barrels, bales, crates, packages, bundles, and pallets.  per year, Heney adds. But in the last 10 years, and more specifically the last three, there has been a decline in the shipment of grains, which has been the port's primary commodity.

The highest grain totals to come out of the Thunder Bay port amounted to 17,679, 719 million tonnes in 1983. A decade later it plummeted to 8,157,168 million tonnes, and Heney says 2003 figures will not fall that much short of last years' even though there has been a 30 per cent rise in wheat production this year.

Today, a majority of the Canadian crop goes to Asia, and it is technically more efficient to go through the Vancouver port.

The seaway has faced higher tolls and shippers are held ransom ransom, price of redemption demanded by the captor of a person, vessel, or city. In ancient times cities frequently paid ransom to prevent their plundering by captors. The custom of ransoming was formerly sanctioned by law.  to higher artificial costs, Heney says. Seaway tolls are very expensive serviced have weighed down the cost of transporting goods through the ports.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

In contrast, the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area.  does not charge for seaway fees and most Canadian ports are within a few hundred miles of U.S. border ports, Heney explains. As well, he adds that Canadian government officials believe the seaway system and ports should be self-sufficient. Moreover, they suggest it should be able to generate revenue.

"Our facilities (buildings and port) here have to pay property taxes. In the United States the ports charge property taxes," Heney adds. "They are heavily subsidized sub·si·dize  
tr.v. sub·si·dized, sub·si·diz·ing, sub·si·diz·es
1. To assist or support with a subsidy.

2. To secure the assistance of by granting a subsidy.
 and we have to be self sufficient and we do not receive any funding."

But there is one port that has received funding. The Port of Churchill The Port of Churchill in Churchill, Manitoba, Canada is a port on the Arctic Ocean. It was once owned by the Government of Canada but was sold to the American company OmniTRAX to run privately.  located on the West Coast of Hudson Bay Hudson Bay, inland sea of North America, c.475,000 sq mi (1,230,000 sq km), c.850 mi (1,370 km) long and c.650 mi (1,050 km) wide, E central Canada. Hudson Bay and James Bay (its southern extension) and all their islands border Nunavut Territory, Manitoba, Ontario,  to date has received approximately $52 million in Canadian federal funds Federal Funds

Funds deposited to regional Federal Reserve Banks by commercial banks, including funds in excess of reserve requirements.

Notes:
These non-interest bearing deposits are lent out at the Fed funds rate to other banks unable to meet overnight reserve
, says Tom Henley spokesman for OmniTRAX, the American company that bought the port in 1997.

Not only has the federal government thrown money behind the northern Arctic port, the Canadian Wheat Board The Canadian Wheat Board (known at times as the Canada Wheat Board or by the acronym CWB) was established by the Parliament of Canada in 1935 as a producer marketing system for wheat and barley. It is headquartered in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. , a department that controls the shipment of grain, is the port's best customer, since they want to obtain the cheapest price for the farmer. Henley suggests that prairie farmers can save approximately $20 per ton on freight by shipping from Churchill instead of other transporting destinations.

Henley describes OmniTRAX as a privately operated company without federal funding.

"That figure ($52 million) however, was money the government had not put into the port during the last few years (when) it owned the port," Henley says.

Henley says the Canadian contribution of approximately $2.2 million in subsidies this past spring pales in comparison to the subsidies the Canadian ports receive from the government. But Heney says he is confused by Henley's statement. To his knowledge he knows of no financial contribution to the Thunder Bay port.

In the past three years and particularly this year, there is a heavy push to ship all they can through the northern port and that has cut approximately 12 per cent of the total grain shipment out of the Thunder Bay Port, Heney explains.

The Port of Churchill will close nearer to October or the first weeks of November. Henley could not disclose information on the projected estimates of cargo or how many tonnes the port has taken in thus far. Nor could he provide rate charge breakdown for shipments, including rail.

www.portauthority.thunderbay.on.ca

BY KELLY LOUISEIZE

Northern Ontario Business Northern Ontario Business is a Canadian magazine, which publishes monthly in Greater Sudbury, Ontario. The magazine covers business news and issues in Northern Ontario.  
COPYRIGHT 2003 Laurentian Business Publishing, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Transportation ReportThunder Bay, Ontario
Author:Louiseize, Kelly.
Publication:Northern Ontario Business
Geographic Code:1CONT
Date:Oct 1, 2003
Words:686
Previous Article:North Bay Hydro Distribution Limited requires an operations engineer.
Next Article:Northern Ontario is "bear" country!
Topics:



Related Articles
Port of Thunder Bay in wait-and-see year, grain sale to Soviets still not finalized.
Port feeling effects of reduced sales of grain.
Grain prices and sales tumble.
Shipment rates reduced at Thunder Bay Port.
The Superior way. (Thunder Bay Port Corp. Profile).
Northern ports await federal security dollars: increasing cost of security could see port user fees increase.
Sea port could support cheap, efficient shipping.
Study looks at potential of waterfront.
Growing Thunder Bay's port in the 21st Century.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles