Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,482,383 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Company can set aside property transfer under recent court decision.


The law firm Hahn & Hessen LLP announced that it has won a contentious fraudulent conveyance
Fraudulent Conveyance
The illegal transfer of property to another party in order to defer, hinder or defraud creditors.

Notes:
In order to be found guilty of fraudulent conveyance, it must be proven that the accused's intention for transferring the property was to put it out of reach of a known creditor.
See also: Conveyance, Creditor, Forensic Accounting
 action on behalf of its client Insilco Corp. The decision, rendered after a trial in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, will enable Insilco to set aside the transfer of a five story building at 591 Park Avenue.

The case arose out of a $15 million note given to Insilco by defendant Star Services, Inc. of Delaware, a company organized by Peter DeGeorge. When the note was about to come due, Star conveyed the Park Avenue property to PRD PRD - Democratic Renewal Party
PRD - Democratic Renovation Party (Cape Verde)
PRD - Democratic Revolutionary Party (Mexico)
PRD - Parti de la Réforme et du Développement (French: Reform and Development Party, Morocco)
PRD - Parti Radical-Democratique Suisse (Radical Free Democratic Party Switzerland)
PRD - Partido de la Revolución Democrática (Party of the Democratic Revolution)
PRD - Partido Revolucionario Dominicano (Republica Dominicana)
 Holdings Inc., another DeGeorge company.

At the time of the transfer, the Park Avenue Property was subject to a mortgage, initially held by Westpac and subsequently assigned to Peter DeGeorge's brother. PRD took the Park Avenue Property free and clear, and Star had no assets to pay Insilco. Although Insilco obtained summary judgment against Star for payment of the note in 1999, for over $21 million, the judgment remains totally. unsatisfied to date.

In this case, Insilco proved at trial that Star was insolvent at the time of the transfer, that the transfer was less than an arm's length transaction, made in bad faith, and that the consideration for the transfer was grossly inadequate.

Insilco also proved that the transfer was made with actual fraudulent intent. Based on these and other factors, the court found the transfer of the Park Avenue Property was both an actual and constructive fraud. As a result, the transfer will be set aside and subject to Insilco's claim.

The court reached the correct conclusion," said John P. McCahey, a litigation partner at Hahn & Hessen LLP, and counsel to Insilco in this case. "This was clearly a case where the defendant had transferred property for the purpose of avoiding its financial obligations. We are pleased with the result."
COPYRIGHT 2002 Hagedorn Publication
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Real Estate Weekly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Dec 4, 2002
Words:309
Previous Article:Expo Park among finalists for redeveloping New Jersey site.
Next Article:Four industry members named Rockefeller Fellows.(real estate and construction industry)
Topics:



Related Articles
Gains tax update; Stanhope decision reversed. (U.S. Court of Appeals finds sale of Stanhope Hotel still subject to New York State Real Property...
How savvy is your contractor? (evaluation of cleaning and maintenance contractors)
Pitfalls abound in foreclosure sale chaos. (includes case studies of real estate foreclosures)
Transfer taxes apply to cash poor too. (last in series of articles summarizing federal, New York State and New York City tax policies in cases of...
Lease ruling favors owners. (Holy Properties Ltd. vs. Kenneth Cole Productions)
MTA STANCE DECRIED.(News)
Ontario judges order return of funding to Community Living St. Catherines.
Wine ruling a setback for consumers.(Brief Article)
Michigan sales tax does not apply to property sold incidental to a service.
Cuno argued before U.S. Supreme Court.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles