Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,815,112 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Comments on proposed pay increase for government employees, November 16, 1989.


Comments on Proposed Pay Increase for Government Employees

November 16, 1989

Yesterday, a bipartisan proposal to address the serious issue of government pay levels was made public. Although much attention has been devoted to the effect of the proposal on Congressional and Judicial salaries, its most dramatic and needed effect would be to increase the salaries of qualified government employees in the Senior Executive Service (SES). Tax Executive Institute believes that increasing salaries of SES employees is a necessary step in maintaining a competent, experienced, and professional civil service. We urge Congress to enact such increases.

Tax Executives Institute (TEI 1. (communications) TEI - Terminal Endpoint Identifier.
2. (text, project) TEI - Text Encoding Initiative.
) is the principal association of corporate tax executives in the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area.  and Canada. The Institute's members are employed by 2,000 of the leading corporations in North America North America, third largest continent (1990 est. pop. 365,000,000), c.9,400,000 sq mi (24,346,000 sq km), the northern of the two continents of the Western Hemisphere.  and represent a cross-section of the business community. TEI and its members deal with National Office and field representatives of the Internal Revenue Service on an almost daily basis, and we are dedicated to maintaining a tax system that works--one that is fair and administrable and with which taxpayers can comply. An essential ingredient to a viable tax system is a dedicated, qualified government workforce.

There can be no real debate that the pay levels of SES and other government employees are significantly lower than their counterparts in the private sector, with the disparities and inequities being more pronounced in some regions of the country than in others. In our view, the continuing pay differential has made it increasingly difficult for the IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws.  (and other government agencies) to attract and retain qualified employees, with the detrimental det·ri·men·tal  
adj.
Causing damage or harm; injurious.



detri·men
 effect being most pronounced on talented middle managers: many have been forced to flee the government for higher-paying positions elsewhere. With no disrespect to the dedicated professionals now in government service, we believe it is essential to face up the blunt truth that Government--like all employers--gets what it pays for. If not adequately addressed, this situation could lead to a demonstrable de·mon·stra·ble  
adj.
1. Capable of being demonstrated or proved: demonstrable truths.

2. Obvious or apparent: demonstrable lies.
 diminution Taking away; reduction; lessening; incompleteness.

The term diminution is used in law to signify that a record submitted by an inferior court to a superior court for review is not complete or not fully certified.
 in the quality of government services.

TEI generally supports efforts to "decouple" the question of Congressional compensation from pay determinations affecting employees of the Judicial and Executive Branches. We believe that the linkage linkage

In mechanical engineering, a system of solid, usually metallic, links (bars) connected to two or more other links by pin joints (hinges), sliding joints, or ball-and-socket joints to form a closed chain or a series of closed chains.
 that exists today has contributed to the inequities in the current pay structure. Thus, we support periodic, separately enacted pay increases for SES and other Executive Branch employees. We recognize, however, that such separate legislation is not feasible during this Session of Congress. We therefore recommend enactment of the bipartisan proposal now before Congress.
COPYRIGHT 1990 Tax Executives Institute, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1990, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Burk, William M.
Publication:Tax Executive
Date:Jan 1, 1990
Words:414
Previous Article:Comments on AICPA financial management proposal, November 22, 1989.
Next Article:Debt or equity? New pathways - another dead end or the yellow brick road?
Topics:



Related Articles
Comments on proposed regulations under Section 125 relating to cafeteria plans. (filed with IRS by Tax Executives Institute on September 21, 1989)
Creditability of Canada's proposed large corporations tax in foreign jurisdictions.
Comments on pending Canadian income tax issues, December 20, 1989.
Review of 1989-1990 consumption tax activity.
Business reacts to FASB's proposal for nonpension retirement benefits.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles