Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,694,555 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Comments on T.D. 8257 and INTL-304-89: interest allocation - transition rules, March 16, 1990.


Comments on T.D. 8257 and INTL-304-89: Interest Allocation - Transition Rules

On March 16, 1990, Tax Executives Institute filed comments with the Internal Revenue Service on the temporary and proposed regulations relating to relating to relate prepconcernant

relating to relate prepbezüglich +gen, mit Bezug auf +acc 
 the transition rules for the allocation and apportionment The process by which legislative seats are distributed among units entitled to representation; determination of the number of representatives that a state, county, or other subdivision may send to a legislative body. The U.S.  of interest expense under section 864(e) of the Internal Revenue Code The Internal Revenue Code is the body of law that codifies all federal tax laws, including income, estate, gift, excise, alcohol, tobacco, and employment taxes. These laws constitute title 26 of the U.S. Code (26 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq. . The Institute's comments, which were prepared under the aegis of the International Tax Committee, are reprinted below.

On August 1, 1989, the Internal Revenue Service issued temporary (T.D. 8257) and proposed (INTL-304-89) regulations concerning the transition rules for the allocation and apportionment of interest expense under section 864(e) of the Internal revenue Code.

The 1989 temporary regulations represent a revision of proposed regulations that were originally issued by the IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws.  on September 1, 1987 (INTL-935-86). See 1987-2 C.B. 43. Because the 1989 regulations are generally effective for taxable years Taxable year

The 12-month period an individual uses to report income for income tax purposes. For most individuals, their tax year is the calendar year.
 beginning after December 31, 1986, taxpayers that followed the 1987 proposed regulations can find themselves facing an increase in their prior years' tax liability. Thus, the regulations retroactively ret·ro·ac·tive  
adj.
Influencing or applying to a period prior to enactment: a retroactive pay increase.



[French rétroactif, from Latin
 penalize pe·nal·ize  
tr.v. pe·nal·ized, pe·nal·iz·ing, pe·nal·iz·es
1. To subject to a penalty, especially for infringement of a law or official regulation. See Synonyms at punish.

2.
 those taxpayers that relied in good faith on the 1987 proposed regulations. TEI 1. (communications) TEI - Terminal Endpoint Identifier.
2. (text, project) TEI - Text Encoding Initiative.
 submits that such a result is wrong and recommends that the 1989 regulations be applied on a prospective-only basis.

Discussion

Temp. Reg. [Sub-section] 1.861-13T provides transitional relief from the expense allocation rules of section 864(e) (which require taxpayers to allocate interest expense on a consolidated, rather than a separate-company, basis). The regulation also provides transitional relief from the consolidated approach to interest allocation for taxpayers that experienced net increases in total indebtedness during certain time periods. The relief is phased in over a four- and five-year period, depending upon the time period in which the net increase in indebtedness occurred. The provision is generally applicable for taxable years beginning after 1986.

The temporary regulations require taxpayers to use an average monthly debt level in computing the percentage of interest expense that is subject to the pre-1987 allocation rules. This is in contrast to the transition rule set forth in the initial proposed regulations, which instructed taxpayers to use a year-end debt level. See Prop. Reg. [Sub-section] 1.861-11(e)(1)(iv) (issued September 1, 1987). TEI submits that the retroactive Having reference to things that happened in the past, prior to the occurrence of the act in question.

A retroactive or retrospective law is one that takes away or impairs vested rights acquired under existing laws, creates new obligations, imposes new duties, or attaches a
 change in the operative rule - which can affect the level of transitional debt and, hence, a taxpayer's liability - is improper.

Stated simply, taxpayers should not be penalized pe·nal·ize  
tr.v. pe·nal·ized, pe·nal·iz·ing, pe·nal·iz·es
1. To subject to a penalty, especially for infringement of a law or official regulation. See Synonyms at punish.

2.
 for relying on the prior regulations, especially where the choice of month-end or year-end debt levels is not dictated by either the statute or the committee reports. Retroactively requiring the use of monthly debt levels will force taxpayers to recompute the amount of 1987 and 1988 interest expense subject to the post-1986 allocation rules, in some cases necessitating the filing of amended returns Amended Return

A return filed in order to make corrections to a tax return from a previous year. It can be used to correct errors and claim a more advantageous filing.

Notes:
An amended return is filed using Form 1040X.
. Taxpayers that in good faith relied upon the prior regulations should not now be required to bear the cost and burden of recomputing their 1987 and 1988 tax liabilities.

TEI believes that the change from the use of year-end to month-end debt levels is an appropriate circumstance for the exercise of the authority granted under section 7805(b) of the Code. The temporary regulations should be amended to require the use of average month-end debt levels on a prospective-only basis.

Conclusion

Tax Executives Institute appreciates this opportunity to present our views on the proposed and temporary regulations relating to the transition rules under section 864(e) of the Code. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Bernard J. Jerlstrom, chair of TEI's International Tax Committee, at (216) 943-4200 (ext. 2163) or the Institute's professional staff (Timothy J. McCormally or Mary L. Fahey) at (202) 638-5601.
COPYRIGHT 1990 Tax Executives Institute, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1990, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Tax Executive
Date:Mar 1, 1990
Words:608
Previous Article:Comments on economic performance and the accrual of state and local property taxes, February 27, 1990.
Next Article:Comments on foreign sales corporations, March 2, 1990.
Topics:



Related Articles
Allocating interest and other expenses under Section 864(e).
Notice 89-91: allocation of charitable contributions under Section 864(e).
Comments on proposed regulations on the allocation and apportionment of charitable contributions: August 2, 1991. (Tax Executives Institute)
Corporate separations under sec. 355.
Responding to the new subsidiary investment and earnings and profits consolidated return regulations.
Accounting for book-tax differences of property contributed to a partnership. (part 1)
Allocation and apportionment of charitable contributions under section 861.
At-risk final regs. on "disqualifying interests".
New rules on FTC allocations.
Current developments.(partnerships)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles