Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,506,428 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Combs v. Wilkinson.


U.S. Appeals Court

DISTURBANCE

USE OF FORCE

Combs v. Wilkinson, 315 F.3d 548 (6th Cir. 2002). Death row inmates sued several state corrections supervisors and officers under [section] 1983, alleging that they used excessive force in quelling a disturbance in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The district court granted the defendants' motions for summary judgment and dismissal, and the inmates appealed. The appeals court affirmed in part, and reversed and remanded in part. The appeals court held that an individual officer's use of mace Mace, chemical spray
Mace, chemical spray device used by police in riot control. Mace is ordinary tear gas (chloroacetophenone, or CN) in a volatile solvent contained in a spray can. It causes severe lacrimation and temporary blindness.
 was not malicious or sadistic sa·dism  
n.
1. The deriving of sexual gratification or the tendency to derive sexual gratification from inflicting pain or emotional abuse on others.

2. The deriving of pleasure, or the tendency to derive pleasure, from cruelty.
. The court found that summary judgment was precluded by fact questions as to whether the commander of a special response team adequately briefed the team members, and failed to control the use of chemical agents in the extraction of inmates. The court held that the commander was not liable under [section] 1983 for failing to admonish team members when he overheard them discussing particular inmates that they wanted to "beat," absent any showing that the commander encouraged or directly participated in the use of excessive force. The court found that the inmates were not entitled en·ti·tle  
tr.v. en·ti·tled, en·ti·tling, en·ti·tles
1. To give a name or title to.

2. To furnish with a right or claim to something:
 to an injunction requiring corrections officers The examples and perspective in this article or section may not represent a worldwide view of the subject.
Please [ improve this article] or discuss the issue on the talk page.
 to wear name tags or other identification and to videotape videotape

Magnetic tape used to record visual images and sound, or the recording itself. There are two types of videotape recorders, the transverse (or quad) and the helical.
 cell extractions, even though their failure to do so was a violation of state corrections policies and regulations. (Mansfield Corr'l Institution, Ohio)
COPYRIGHT 2003 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:SAFETY AND SECURITY; violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U3OH
Date:May 1, 2003
Words:224
Previous Article:Seehausen v. Van Buren.(RULES & REGULATIONS-PRISONER)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Jordan Ex Rel. Johnson v. Taylor.(SAFETY AND SECURITY)(strip searches on prison visitor)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. Appeals Court: RACIAL DISCRIMINATION.(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: FAMILY DENIAL OF VISITS.(Brief Article)
[0] U.S. Appeals Court: LEGAL MAIL.(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: DISCIPLINE.(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: WORK.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: DISCIPLINE.(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: DISCIPLINE REMOVAL FROM JOB.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
Wever v. Lincoln County, Nebraska.(FAILURE TO PROTECT)(Brief Article)
Wever v. Lincoln County, Nebraska.(LIABILITY)(Brief Article)
Davis v. Hall.(due process of law)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles