Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,680,088 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Colton v. Ashcroft.


U.S. District Court

INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Colton v. Ashcroft, 299 F.Supp.2d 681 (E.D.Ky. 2004). A federal prisoner filed a petition for habeas corpus relief alleging that the federal Bureau of Prison's new regulation, which would delay his release to a halfway house until only ten percent of his sentence remained, violated the notice and comment provisions of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA (All Points Addressable) Refers to an array (bitmapped screen, matrix, etc.) in which all bits or cells can be individually manipulated.

APA - Application Portability Architecture
). The district court granted the prisoner's motion for a preliminary injunction. The court held that the Prison Litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute.

When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation.
 Reform Act's (PLRA PLRA Partido Liberal Radical Autentico (Paraguay)
PLRA Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995
) exhaustion requirements did not apply to a habeas petition. The court noted that the public interest would be served by the grant of an injunction and that the prisoner would be irreparably harmed in the absence of an injunction. The court ordered the prisoner to be immediately transferred to a halfway house without regard to the new regulation. (FMC-Lexington, Kentucky, Federal Bureau of Prisons Noun 1. Federal Bureau of Prisons - the law enforcement agency of the Justice Department that operates a nationwide system of prisons and detention facilities to incarcerate inmates sentenced to imprisonment for federal crimes
BoP
)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:LIABILITY
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Nov 1, 2004
Words:151
Previous Article:Brown v. Mitchell.(LIABILITY)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Cooper v. Office of Sheriff of Will County.(LIABILITY)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
State lawyers press defense of suicide law.(Health)(Federal court: Both sides file arguments on Ashcroft's attempt to block the Oregon statute.)
Assisted suicide ruling expected by late April.(Courts)(Court: A judge will rule whether the U.S. government can stop Oregon's law.)
Gun rights guaranteed?(Editorials)(AG reverses longtime Second Amendment policy)(Editorial)
Second thoughts. (Ashcroft's 'Reasonable Restrictions').(John Ashcroft, General attorney; United States)(Brief Article)
An ideologue at Justice.(Editorials)(Ashcroft persists in trying to undo assisted suicide)(Editorial)
John Ashcroft: making a federal case out of sin.(Up front: news and opinion from independent minds)
Report belies Ashcroft Probe cites credible claims of rights violations.(Editorials)(Editorial)
Colton v. Ashcroft.(petition for habeas corpus relief)(Brief Article)
Colton v. Ashcroft.(HABEAS CORPUS)(violation of Administrative Procedure Act)(Brief Article)
Oregon suicide law comes to high court.(Courts)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles