Printer Friendly

Colonoscopy screening would avert cancer.

Of all malignancies, colon cancer seems the most avoidable. By inserting a flexible scope into a person's colon via the rectum, a physician can detect precancerous growths called polyps. A device attached to the scope can snip them off--all during the same outpatient visit. But the procedure, called colonoscopy, is expensive and uncomfortable. So, many people avoid it.

Colorectal cancer, meanwhile, kills more than 50,000 people every year in the United States. Among malignancies, only lung cancer kills more. Two studies now bolster the case for more-frequent colonoscopy screening.

Colonoscopy screening that would test people over 50 once a decade could cut colorectal cancer deaths by half, researchers from Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., reported last month in New York at the 65th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology.

Another team finds that colonoscopy once per decade would be as cost-effective in the long run as less expensive, less invasive colorectal screening tests that must be administered more frequently. The report of that finding by Amnon Sonnenberg and his colleagues at the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque appears in the Oct. 17 ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE.

The two statistical analyses compared colonoscopy for people over age 50 with a combination of laboratory examination of stool samples (see p. 311) and a procedure called sigmoidoscopy, which reveals the lower third of the colon.

A stool examination costs about $33, a sigmoidoscopy runs roughly $250, and a colonoscopy can be priced anywhere from $700 to $1,000. Insurance companies and Medicare have only recently begun paying for these tests, and only in certain cases, says Sonnenberg. To avoid colon cancer, "the down payment for colonoscopy is larger," he says.

The studies complement earlier reports showing colonoscopy reveals up to twice as many polyps as sigmoidoscopy.

A polyp takes about 20 years on average to become cancerous, says A. Lindsay Frazier of Harvard Medical School in Boston. A single colonoscopy at age 55 could catch a third of all polyps before they become malignant, she and her colleagues estimate in a report in the Oct. 18 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION.

"Everyone over 50 should be screened," Frazier says, either by colonoscopy or a combination of the other tests. As of 1997, less than a third of people in the United States over age 50 had had a sigmoidoscopy in the preceding 5 years.

Whether these reports ultimately will lead to routine colonoscopy screening may depend more on economic issues than medical ones. "The question is," says Sonnenberg, "are we willing to invest resources in the prevention of colorectal cancer?"

--N.S.
COPYRIGHT 2000 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2000, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:research confirms the value of colonoscopy screening
Author:N.S.
Publication:Science News
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Nov 11, 2000
Words:446
Previous Article:Pile-o'-polymers breaks up on command.
Next Article:Mutation linked to sinus infections.
Topics:


Related Articles
Selected Ongoing Clinical Trials [*].
CT scan works as well as colonoscopy.
Screening preferences for colorectal cancer: a patient demographic study.
Do gastroenterologists notify polyp patients that family members should have screening?
Silenced gene may foretell colon cancer.
Colorectal cancer screening: today and tomorrow.
CME Questions: colorectal cancer screening: today and tomorrow.
Patient's page.
The screen team: less unpleasant colon exams might catch more cancers.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters