Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,595,259 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Cohen Milstein Announces Court Denies Summary Judgment: Human Rights Case Against Exxon Mobil Will Go to Trial.


WASHINGTON -- The United States District Court for the District of Columbia The United States District Court for the District of Columbia is the United States District Court that hears cases originating in the District of Columbia over which federal courts have original jurisdiction.  has denied Exxon Mobil Corporation's motion for summary judgment motion for summary judgment n. a written request for a judgment in the moving party's favor before a lawsuit goes to trial and based on recorded (testimony outside court) affidavits (or declarations under penalty of perjury), depositions, admissions of fact, answers  in Doe DOE - Distributed Object Environment: a distributed object-oriented application framework from SunSoft.  v. Exxon Mobil Corp., removing the last procedural hurdle HURDLE, Eng. law. A species of sledge, used to draw traitors to execution.  before trial in a groundbreaking case establishing corporate responsibility for international human rights abuses.

The District Court ruled in favor of upon the side of; favorable to; for the advantage of.

See also: favor
 the plaintiffs, eleven Indonesian civilians who were the alleged victims of rape, murder, and torture, at the hands of the military security personnel protecting Exxon Mobil's large natural gas facilities in Aceh, Indonesia. The defendant, Exxon Mobil, is the world's largest publicly traded international oil and gas company and has recently set records for earning the largest U.S. quarterly profits in history.

Plaintiffs presented evidence that Exxon Mobil and its Indonesian subsidiary are liable for killings and torture committed by military security forces protecting the company premises. The Court ruled that plaintiffs have provided sufficient evidence to proceed to trial on all of their claims.

Significantly, the Court found that Exxon Mobil could be responsible for the violent acts committed by the security forces because the company retained them, paid them, and could have controlled them. The Court also found that Exxon Mobil could be liable for negligently neg·li·gent  
adj.
1. Characterized by or inclined to neglect, especially habitually.

2. Characterized by careless ease or informality; casual.

3. Law Guilty of negligence.
 hiring a security force with a reputation for committing violent human rights abuses.

Having exhausted its procedures to avoid trial, Exxon Mobil will now have to defend itself before a jury. The District Court has not yet set a date for the trial, which will take place in Washington, D.C.

Plaintiffs are represented a legal team including Michael D. Hausfeld and Agnieszka Fryszman, firm partners and members of the international human rights legal team of Cohen cohen
 or kohen

(Hebrew: “priest”) Jewish priest descended from Zadok (a descendant of Aaron), priest at the First Temple of Jerusalem. The biblical priesthood was hereditary and male.
, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll P.L.L.C. (Washington, DC). A copy of the District Court opinion and other relevant information about the case is available at www.cmht.com.
COPYRIGHT 2008 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Aug 27, 2008
Words:307
Previous Article:NEXT Financial Group, Inc. Wins 7th "Broker-dealer of the Year" Award in Its 9 Year History.
Next Article:Waltman Returns to Phoenix Investment Partners To Lead Product Management and Development.
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. corporations can be held liable for human rights abuses abroad, Ninth Circuit rules.
Does hospital's sovereign immunity cover its CEO?
Allowing interlocutory appeals from orders denying summary judgment.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles