Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,544,810 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Closed-end fund tender offers escape adverse tax consequences.


Many closed-end regulated investment fund companies reserve the fight to tender for their stock (that is, to buy back shares at a set price) when management believes it is undervalued by the market. These tender offers typically are made at net asset value as of the close of business on the day they end.

The question from a tax viewpoint is whether such a buyback
Buyback
The buying back of outstanding shares (repurchase) by a company in order to reduce the number of shares on the market. Companies will buyback shares either to increase the value of shares still available (reducing supply), or to eliminate any threats by shareholders who may be looking for a controlling stake.

Notes:
A buyback is a method for company to invest in itself since they can't own themselves.
 is part of a "periodic redemption plan." If it is, the tendering shareholders will realize dividend income equal to the full buyback proceeds. The buyback will not qualify for sale treatment because the tendering shareholders do not incur a meaningful reduction in proportionate interest (the shareholder has the power to recover lost interest by electing not to participate in later buybacks).

More significant, the nontendering shareholders are deemed to receive a "constructive" dividend reflecting the value of their increased proportionate interest in the corporation.

A recent ruling indicates these arrangements will generally not be construed as periodic redemption plans, so no shareholder will be deemed to receive constructive dividends. To avoid periodic redemption plan status a corporation must not be required to redeem its stock and, at the time of a buyback, may have no plan or commitment to make further offers.

Moreover, periodic redemption plan classification will not be found even though the corporation reserves the right to make additional offers in the future.

Observation: Closed-end funds will have the ability to make tender offers without adverse tax consequences-so long as each offer is not required and there is no plan or commitment to make subsequent tender offers.
COPYRIGHT 1993 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1993, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Abrams, William
Publication:Journal of Accountancy
Article Type:Brief Article
Date:Jan 1, 1993
Words:264
Previous Article:Identifying personal service corporations. (Brief Article)
Next Article:Final regulations on dual consolidated loss. (Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Tax consequences of solution transactions. (First part of four series article)
Now what? Collateral consequences of transfer pricing adjustments.
Avoid the employment tax delinquency trap.
Where AAA and its critics have disagreed.(Business)
LAWMAKER RAILS AGAINST BUDGET CUTS.(News)
Contingent attorney's fees.(Court Decisions)
Gabelli Funds Issues Research Report on Managed Distribution Policies for Closed-End Funds.
PA Fund Management Announces Conference Call To Provide Nicholas-Applegate Closed-End Funds Investment Update.
Realistic but uninspiring.(Editorials)(Governor's budget faces political, financial facts)(Editorial)
The Korea Fund, Inc. Announces Results of Its Second Quarter Measurement Period.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles