Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,582,462 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

CleanFlicks v. Kate Winslet's Breasts.


Maybe Hollywood is stupid, as Nick Gillespie Nick Gillespie has been the editor-in-chief of Reason magazine since 2000. He has written articles or been a commentator for many media outlets. Gillespie is known for frequently appearing in his trademark leather jacket. He has two sons, Jack and Neal.[1].  says in "CleanFlicks v. Kate Winslet's Breasts" (October), to underserve un·der·serve  
tr.v. un·der·served, un·der·serv·ing, un·der·serves
To supply with insufficient services, especially social and health services.
 the religious market for wholesome whole·some  
adj. whole·som·er, whole·som·est
1. Conducive to sound health or well-being; salutary: simple, wholesome food; a wholesome climate.

2.
 family entertainment. But a company that creates a secondary revenue stream on modified source material is still stealing.

It's true that each consumer "edits" artistic content through a personal filter that includes life experience, beliefs, preferences, etc. It's also true that copying cassettes, burning CDs, and skipping over commercials and dumb sitcom jokes constitute personalization Custom tailoring information to the individual. On the Web, personalization means returning a page that has been customized for the user, taking into consideration that person's habits and preferences.  of the consumer experience. But there's no money exchanged, and the "filterer" does not occupy the same plane as the "visionary creator," without whom there would be nothing to filter.

I'm sure the producers and creators would be fine with the old-fashioned method: With ears plugged and eyes closed, viewers can shout "la la la" until the scary parts are over. But if CleanFlicks wants to make commercial edits to a Hollywood blockbuster block·bust·er  
n.
1. Something, such as a film or book, that sustains widespread popularity and achieves enormous sales.

2. A high-explosive bomb used for demolition purposes.

3.
, it should create and finance one of its own.

Julie Welke

Ferndale, MI
COPYRIGHT 2007 Reason Foundation
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Letters
Author:Welke, Julie
Publication:Reason
Article Type:Letter to the editor
Date:Jan 1, 2007
Words:163
Previous Article:The real mommy wars.(Letters)(Letter to the editor)
Next Article:The longneck Tail.(Letters)(Letter to the editor)



Related Articles
WINSOME AND WHOLLY WINSLETT.(L.A. Life)
METHOD TO WINSLET'S MADNESS : PUTTING HERSELF THROUGH EMOTIONAL WRINGER IN ONE HYSTERICAL MOVIE ROLE AFTER ANOTHER, `JUDE' STAR FINDS REAL LIFE A...
DIRECTORS SUED OVER VIDEOS' EDITING, CONTENT FIRM CUTS OUT SEX, VIOLENCE.(Business)
THE BUZZ HANGING CURVES.(U)
FINDING KATE WINSLET 'NEVERLAND' PROVES ACTRESS IS AN INSPIRATION, IN MORE WAYS THAN ONE.(U)
MOM'S THE WORD WINSLET TAPS INTO PARENTAL ANGST.(U)
CleanFlicks v. Kate Winslet's breasts: how Hollywood won a legal battle while losing a cultural war.
MATERNAL INSTINCT KATE WINSLET DISCUSSES THE MAKING OF A GOOD (OR BAD) MOTHER.(U)
TINSELTOWN SPYWITNESS.(U)
Little Children // New Line.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles