Class Action suit filed against America Online, Inc. and its officers, directors and accountants alleging misrepresentations, false financial statements and insider trading.NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 24, 1997--A class action has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia is one of two United States district courts serving the Commonwealth of Virginia. History During the 1960s, Judge Albert V. Bryan Jr. , Alexandria Division, on behalf of purchasers of America Online See AOL. , Inc.("AOL (A division of Time Warner, Inc., New York, NY, www.aol.com) The world's largest online information service with access to the Internet, e-mail, chat rooms and a variety of databases and services. ") common stock during the period August 10, 1995 to October 29, 1996. The complaint, as detailed below, alleges that AOL and certain of its officers, directors and AOL's outside public accountants violated the federal securities laws. AOL provides on-line services to personal computer users, in competition with other on-line service providers and with direct Internet access See how to access the Internet. and service providers. During AOL's 1996 fiscal year ("F96"), ended June 30, 1996, AOL reported strong growth in net income and earnings per share ("EPS (Encapsulated PostScript) A PostScript file format used to transfer a graphic image between applications and platforms. EPS files contain PostScript code as well as an optional preview image in TIFF, WMF, PICT or EPSI, the latter being an ASCII-only format. ") totaling $29.8 million or $.28 per share with shareholders' equity Shareholders' Equity A firms' total assets minus its total liabilities. Equivalently, it is share capital plus retained earnings minus treasury shares. Shareholders' equity is the amount by which a company is financed through common and preferred shares. increasing to $512 million, based on AOL's largest single asset -- "Deferred Subscriber Acquisition Costs" -- of $314 million, resulting from AOL's vastly increasing marketing expenditures to try to attract subscribers to its system. AOL's interim F96 financial results were reviewed by Ernst & Young ("E&Y") and represented by AOL as fairly presenting its financial condition and results of operations in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles The standard accounting rules, regulations, and procedures used by companies in maintaining their financial records. Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) provide companies and accountants with a consistent set of guidelines that cover both broad accounting ("GAAP GAAP See: Generally Accepted Accounting Principles GAAP See generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). "), as were its F96 results which were certified by E&Y as being fairly presented in conformity with GAAP, after an audit by E&Y in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards Generally Accepted Auditing Standards, or GAAS, are ten auditing standards, developed by the AICPA, consisting of general standards, standards of field work, and standards of reporting, along with interpretations. ("GAAS See gallium arsenide. "). AOL and E&Y justified AOL's deferral of hundreds of millions of subscriber acquisition costs (basically direct response advertising and marketing expenditures) and their amortization over a 24-month period on the ground that the average AOL subscriber stayed with AOL for over 40 months and had a lifetime subscription value of over $700. In addition, AOL represented that its new direct Internet access service -- Global Network Navigator Global Network Navigator - (GNN) A collection of free services provided by O'Reilly & Associates. The Whole Internet Catalog describes the most useful Net resources and services with live links to those resources. The GNN Business Pages list companies on the Internet. ("GNN GNN - Global Network Navigator ") -- and its Booklink WebBrowser was very successful and attracting large numbers of subscribers -- thus enabling AOL to effectively compete in the Internet access market. As a result of its success, positive momentum and subscriber growth resulting from its increasing marketing expenditures, AOL forecast increased F97 EPS of $1.00+ and that AOL would reach 10 million subscribers by June 1997, and AOL's stock soared to an all-time high of $71 per share in May 1996. However, during June-Oct. 1996, AOL's stock declined sharply, as AOL revealed that despite its greatly increased marketing expenditures it was suffering from slowing subscriber growth and increased subscriber cancellations, such that it could not forecast future subscriber retention rates, i.e., subscriber life. Thus, AOL had to reduce its marketing expenditures and concentrate on trying to increase subscriber retention. Then, on Oct. 29, 1996, just a few weeks after AOL had issued its F96 financial statements and E&Y had certified its assets, earnings and shareholders' equity, as well as the appropriateness of AOL's accounting practices, AOL revealed that it was taking huge write-offs of $460 million, including: (i) a $385 million write-off of all previously deferred or (capitalized) subscriber acquisition costs, and would end its practice of not expensing such costs; and (ii) a $75 million "restructuring" write- off which, inter alia [Latin, Among other things.] A phrase used in Pleading to designate that a particular statute set out therein is only a part of the statute that is relevant to the facts of the lawsuit and not the entire statute. , would completely eliminate AOL's investment in GNN and its WebBrowser, which had failed as an Internet access product, resulting in the firing of over 300 employees. Thus, AOL instantly eliminated in its entirety the largest single asset on its balance sheet, reduced its shareholders' equity by 80% and wiped out by five times over the total pre-tax net income it had ever reported. It is now clear that AOL had never earned any profits and, in fact, had been incurring huge operating losses in prior years rather than the profits it had claimed, AOL will not reach 10 million subscribers by June 1997 and instead of the profitable growth forecast by and for it in F97, AOL will suffer huge losses. During mid-Oct. 1996, AOL stock collapsed to as low as $22-3/8 per share -- 70% below its Class Period and all-time high of $71. However, before the truth about AOL's huge losses, improper accounting practices, failed Internet access product and inability to reach the 10 million subscriber mark by June 1997 were revealed, AOL and the 18 insiders named as defendants took advantage of the artificial inflation in AOL's stock their false and misleading statements had caused to sell off 4.9 million and 2.1 million shares of AOL stock, respectively, at prices as high as $55-3/8 per share. This enabled AOL to obtain $139 million in badly needed new capital and the 18 insiders to pocket over $95 million in insider trading profits. AOL's co-founder and Chairman Emeritus James V James V, king of Scotland James V, 1512–42, king of Scotland (1513–42), son and successor of James IV. His mother, Margaret Tudor, held the regency until her marriage in 1514 to Archibald Douglas, 6th earl of Angus, when she lost it to John . Kimsey sold 82% of his AOL stock -- 651,000 shares at as high as $55-3/8 per share pocketing $24.5 million. AOL's co-founder, Chairman and CEO (1) (Chief Executive Officer) The highest individual in command of an organization. Typically the president of the company, the CEO reports to the Chairman of the Board. Stephen Case sold 76% of his AOL stock -- 575,000 shares at as high as $55 per share pocketing $29.1 million. AOL's Chief Financial Officer, Lennert Leader, sold 66% of his AOL stock -- 210,800 shares at as high as $54 per share, pocketing $10 million. Collectively, the 18 AOL insiders named as defendants unloaded 72% of their AOL holdings during the Class Period. Plaintiffs seek to recover damages on behalf of all purchasers of AOL common stock during the Class Period (the "Class"). They are represented by several law firms This list of the world's largest law firms by revenue is taken from The Lawyer and The American Lawyer and is ordered by 2006 revenue:[1]
Milberg Weiss has been actively engaged in commercial litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute. When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation. , emphasizing securities and antitrust class actions, for more than 20 years. The firm has offices in New York New York, state, United States New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of , San Diego, San Francisco and Los Angeles and is active in major litigation pending in federal and state courts throughout the United States. The firm's reputation for excellence has been recognized on repeated occasions by courts which have appointed the firm to major positions in complex multi- district or consolidated litigations. Milberg Weiss has taken a lead role in numerous important actions on behalf of defrauded investors, and has been responsible for a number of outstanding recoveries which, in the aggregate, total approximately $2 billion. For additional information about Milberg Weiss, see the firm's website at http://www.milberg.com. Morris and Morris, located in Wilmington, Delaware, has taken a principal role in successfully litigating numerous complex securities class actions on behalf of shareholders in federal and state courts throughout the United States, resulting in hundreds of millions of dollars in recoveries for investors. Securities fraud, antitrust and derivative actions are the primary focus of Morris and Morris' practice, and members of Morris and Morris have been actively litigating representative actions for as long as forty years. Recognizing the ability, experience and reputation of Morris and Morris, courts have frequently appointed Morris and Morris to serve as lead or co-lead counsel for plaintiffs in major class and derivative actions. For more information about Morris and Morris and its practice, please write Morris and Morris, 1105 N. Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, requesting a copy of the Morris and Morris firm resume, or fax your request to (302) 426-0406. If you are a member of the Class described above, you may, no later than 60 days from today, move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff of the Class, if you so choose. In order to serve as lead plaintiff, however, you must meet certain legal requirements. If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact plaintiffs' counsel, Keith M. Fleischman or Samuel H. Rudman of Milberg Weiss at 800/922-0187 or Karen L. Morris or Abraham Rappaport of Morris and Morris at 800/296-0410. CONTACT: Keith M. Fleischman or Samuel H. Rudman Milberg Weiss at 800/922-0187 or Karen L. Morris or Abraham Rappaport Morris and Morris at 800/296-0410 |
|
||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion