Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Williams Companies, Inc./Williams Communications Group; Scott + Scott, LLC Files Complaint on Behalf of Investors.
COLCHESTER, Conn. -- Scott + Scott, LLC (Logical Link Control) See "LANs" under data link protocol.
LLC - Logical Link Control (email@example.com), a Connecticut-based law firm with offices also outside of Philadelphia announced today that it has filed a class action lawsuit class action lawsuit
A lawsuit in which one party or a limited number of parties sue on behalf of a larger group to which the parties belong. For example, investors may bring a class action lawsuit against a brokerage firm that has actively promoted a tax on January 29, 2002, on behalf of purchasers of the common stock of Williams Companies The Williams Companies, Inc. (NYSE: WMB) is an energy company based in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Its core business is natural gas exploration, production, processing, and transportation, with additional petroleum and electricity generation assets. , Inc. and/or Williams Communications Group, Inc. between July 24, 2000 and January 29, 2002, inclusive. A copy of the complaint filed in this action is available from the Court. The action is pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma The United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma is the Federal district court whose jurisdiction comprises the following counties: Craig, Creek, Delaware, Mayes, Nowata, Osage, Ottawa, Pawnee, Rogers, Tulsa, and Washington. It is based in Tulsa. , located at 333 West Fourth Street, Tulsa, Oklahoma Tulsa is the second-largest city in the state of Oklahoma and 45th-largest in the United States. With an estimated population of 382,872 in 2006, it is the principal municipality of the Tulsa Metropolitan Statistical Area, a region of 897,752 residents projected to 74103, against defendants WMB WMB Waste Management Board
WMB Write Me Back
WMB Wheaton Municipal Band (Wheaton, IL)
WMB Waukegan Municipal Band (Waukegan, IL)
WMB Websphere Message Broker , WCG WCG World Cyber Games
WCG Worldwide Church of God
WCG World Community Grid
WCG Wellington Caving Group (caving club in New Zealand)
WCG Washington Calligraphers Guild
WCG West Coast Grocery , Keith E. Bailey, Howard E. Janzen and Scott E. Schubert.
If you would like more information about this particular lawsuit, please contact Neil Rothstein, Esq., (firstname.lastname@example.org) or David R. Scott, Esq., (800)404-7770 (email@example.com); you may also visit our website at www.scott-scott.com . If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff you must move the Court no later than April 1, 2002. Any purchaser as described herein may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member.
The Complaint alleges that defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market between July 24, 2000 and January 29, 2002, thereby artificially inflating the price of WMB common stock and WCG common stock. Specifically, the complaint alleges that WMB and WCG issued a series of statements concerning their businesses, financial results and operations which failed to disclose (i) that the spin-off of WCG from WMB was not in the best interests of both WMB and WCG shareholders as the primary motivation for the spin-off of WCG was to allow WMB to shore up its balance sheet so that it could then issue more stock and/or debt to acquire companies using its common stock as currency and protect its debt rating; (ii) that WCG was operating at levels well below company-sponsored expectations, such that revenue projections were overstated o·ver·state
tr.v. o·ver·stat·ed, o·ver·stat·ing, o·ver·states
To state in exaggerated terms. See Synonyms at exaggerate.
o , and costs and expenses were understated, and also such that, in an effort to control costs, defendants would soon have to take actions which would have a further adverse impact on WCG's profitability; (iii) that approximately $2 billion of WCG debt that was guaranteed for payment by WMB around the time of the spin-off was improperly footnoted by WMB as a mere contingent obligation of WMB, which was materially false and misleading because the declining financial condition of WCG made it increasingly certain that WMB would be forced to pay on such guaranties, for which it did not adequately reserve; (iv) that WCG's assets were permanently impaired and had to be written-off and that WCG avoided taking such write-offs on its own books through the series of financial machinations described in the complaint; (v) that WMB was carrying on its financial statements receivables from WCG that were impaired, uncollectible and should have been written-off in whole or in substantial part. Rather than writing off these impaired assets, which amounted to tens of millions of dollars, WMB agreed to extend up to $100 million of WCG's receivables with an outstanding balance due on March 31, 2001, to March 15, 2002; and (vi) that the sale and leaseback of WCG's office properties in or about September of 2001 was a non-arm's-length transaction at an inflated value for the properties whose motive and intent was to funnel monies to WCG and avoid forcing WMB to perform its guaranties and thereby adversely affect its results and debt ratings.
On 01/29/02, as alleged in the complaint, WMB shocked the market by announcing that it would be delaying the release of its 2001 earnings "pending an internal assessment of William's contingent obligations to Williams Communications." According to the press release, WMB "expects to be able to estimate the financial effect, if any, regarding its ultimate obligation related to WCG's $1.4 billion debt and network lease agreement covering assets that cost $750 million." In response to WMB's shocking announcement, as alleged in the complaint, the price of WMB common stock, which was already substantially eroded from its prior year's high, declined sharply, falling from approximately $24 per share to as low as $18.70 per share and the already depressed WCG common stock declined to as low as $1.30 per share.
Scott + Scott, LLC is a Connecticut based law firm engaged in the representation of funds, foundations, endowments, institutions, pension funds, individuals and other entities throughout the world in securities, antitrust and other complex class and non-class action litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute.
When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation. . The firm was founded upon its ongoing dedication to client satisfaction and communication. The firm's attorneys litigate in both state and federal courts throughout the nation. The firm has been appointed "lead counsel" on cases nationwide and it presently represents the Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. in the securities class action involving the Enron Corporation.
If you would like to obtain more information about this case and would like to discuss the matter with an attorney. Please contact: David R. Scott or Neil Rothstein at 800/404-7770.
MAKE YOUR OPINION COUNT - Click Here
Contact: David R. Scott or Neil Rothstein, both of Scott + Scott, LLC, +1-800-404-7770