Printer Friendly

Civil discourse.

Civil: adhering to the norms of polite social intercourse; not deficient in common courtesy


Discourse: communication of thought by words; talk; conversation

We hear a lot these days about the poor quality of debate and dialogue in this country, especially as we move through a presidential election year. Complaints abound about the extent of negativity and lack of respect for those with differing viewpoints. And, of course, we see it daily on television as proponents of opposing points of view shout at each other, listening only to themselves and not to each other, and competing to see who can yell the loudest.

This growing incivility in the nation--this lack of civil discourse--endangers our democracy. And it sadly goes beyond the boundaries of political campaigns and the daily debates we see on television. Incivility has begun to permeate society in general. The League has always counted on citizens to regulate themselves in their discourse and to show respect for those who hold differing opinions. Unfortunately, such self-regulation is declining and disintegrating.

The League of Women Voters has always stood for honest debate and civil discourse. Indeed, we pride ourselves on being an organization within which one can engage in a rational and respectful discussion about an issue with those of opposing viewpoints. That is one of our treasured values.

The League's high standard for discourse has long been a model in our communities. And so, in this election year, let us each rededicate ourselves to encouraging the highest standards of civility by sharing and promoting our values at every opportunity. Lack of respect for others and their opinions has no place in our nation. Fair debate and civility do. Civil discourse is essential to the resolution of complex problems and the promotion of effective democracy.
 Democracy is a means of living together despite our differences.
 Democratic deliberation is an alternative to physical violence. It is
 predicated on the assumption that it's possible to disagree agreeably,
 that it's better to laugh than cry, that one can vigorously contest
 the positions of one's adversary without questioning his or her
 personal integrity or motivation, and that parties to a debate are
 entitled to the presumption that their views are legitimate if not

--Thomas Mann, Forum on "Civil Discourse and American Politics: Reality and Responsibility," sponsored by the Wood-stock Theological Center, May 1997.


LWVUS President
COPYRIGHT 2004 League of Women Voters
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion




Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Out Front
Author:Maxwell, Kay J.
Publication:National Voter
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jun 1, 2004
Previous Article:Hill Bulletin.
Next Article:Greetings from M Street!

Related Articles
Public speech and private chats.
Dorothy Auchter. Dictionary of Literary and Dramatic Censorship in Tudor and Stuart England.
Civility, 'Oregon style'.
Implications Of Hizbullah's Rise.
Democracy in Latin America, 1760-1900: Volume I, Civic Selfhood and Public Life in Mexico and Peru.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2015 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters