Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,488,626 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Citing 1909 law, N.C. judge blocks 2 executions until state approves role of doctors


Citing a century-old law passed to keep the state from spending too much on its first electric chair, a judge put two executions on hold Thursday as North Carolina struggles with the role doctors should play in carrying out the death penalty.

The ruling by Superior Court Judge Donald Stephens delays the executions of Marcus Reymond Robinson, 33, who had been scheduled to die at 2 a.m. Friday, and James Edward Thomas, 51, set to die next week.

But the ruling further complicates the debate over whether the state can carry out executions without the assistance of an attending physician. State law requires a doctor's presence at executions, but the North Carolina Medical Board decided last week that any participation by a physician violated medical ethics.

The state decided a nurse and medical technician _ instead of a doctor _ would monitor condemned inmates' vital signs as they die by lethal injection. A doctor would now only observe the execution and later sign a death certificate.

But Stephens said such a change in the state's process for imposing a death sentence requires, under a law passed in 1909, the approval of North Carolina's Council of State _ the governor and the nine other statewide office holders.

"This is a critical aspect of the protocol in North Carolina, that a physician participate," said Thomas' attorney, Robert Zaytoun. "A physician can't simply be a fly on the wall."

The 1909 law was originally written to ensure that corrections officials didn't spent more than $1,000 on a new electric chair, state attorney Tom Pitman said.

The next meeting of the Council of State is set for Feb. 6. Renee Hoffman, a spokeswoman for Gov. Mike Easley, declined to say whether Easley would call an unscheduled meeting to approve the new death penalty procedure.

Copyright 2007 AP Features
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright (c) Mochila, Inc.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:ESTES THOMPSON
Publication:AP Features
Date:Jan 25, 2007
Words:300
Previous Article:U.S. ambassador praises former Khmer Rouge photographer for apologizing
Next Article:Lawyers appeal for condemned inmate who claims brain damage



Related Articles
Executions on hold in some states
N.C. judge blocks 2 executions
Judge delays 3rd execution in 2 days
Anesthesiologists Advised on Executions
NC Moves to Limit MD Role in Executions
Judge blocks 2 executions until state approves doctors' new role
Inmate seeking stay of execution from U.S. Supreme Court
North Carolina judge delays 3rd execution in 2 days, citing 1909 law
Executions in many places are on hold because of ethical conflict for doctors
Judge tells North Carolina to reconsider its execution protocol, says officials erred

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles