Churches Are Exempt From Calif. Preservation Law.Religious organizations are free from California's historic preservation Historic preservation is the act of maintaining and repairing existing historic materials and the retention of a property's form as it has evolved over time. When considering the United States Department of Interior's interpretation: "Preservation calls for the existing form, law and may raze raze also rase tr.v. razed also rased, raz·ing also ras·ing, raz·es also ras·es 1. To level to the ground; demolish. See Synonyms at ruin. 2. To scrape or shave off. 3. or modify houses of worship at will, the state Supreme Court has ruled. The state high court ruled 4-3 Dec. 21 that a 1994 California law California Law consists of 29 codes, covering various subject areas, the State Constitution and Statutes. See also
In passing the law, the state "simply stepped out of the way of the religious property owner," Justice Marvin Baxter wrote for the majority. But dissenting Justice Stanley Mosk Stanley Mosk (September 12, 1912–June 19, 2001) was an associate justice of the California Supreme Court for 37 years (1964-2001), and holds the record for the longest-serving justice on that court. argued that the measure infringes on church-state separation by giving religious groups a powerful benefit that other organizations do not enjoy. Mosk asserted that the ruling would give religious leaders the right to knock down historic structures "for the purpose of erecting an office building simply for financial advantage." State legislators passed the law to help Roman Catholic Church Roman Catholic Church, Christian church headed by the pope, the bishop of Rome (see papacy and Peter, Saint). Its commonest title in official use is Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. leaders in San Francisco and Los Angeles who wanted to close a number of old churches with dwindling dwin·dle v. dwin·dled, dwin·dling, dwin·dles v.intr. To become gradually less until little remains. v.tr. To cause to dwindle. See Synonyms at decrease. congregations. Some parishioners grew angry over the proposed closings and threatened to sue under historic preservation laws to keep the churches open. A state judge declared the law unconstitutional in 1996, but his ruling was overturned on appeal. The state supreme court ruling upholds that opinion. (East Bay Asian Development Corporation v. State of California) |
|
||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion