Christology and Patriarchy.

To the Editors:

In her article "The Risks of Repeating Ourselves: Reading Feminist/Womanist Figures of Jesus" (Summer 1998), Karen Trimble Alliaume noted that "feminists used two strategies, abandonment and unmasking, in resisting the efforts of orthodox christological foundations." This observation tells us that women theologians have been trapped into framing christology solely as a reaction to and within the perimeters set by the Patriarchy - the overarching centrality of Jesus's maleness as King, Son, Lord, and representative priest.

May I suggest a variation on Rosemary Ruether's approach? For me, Jesus is the image of - the prefiguration of - the highest manifestation of humanness: the unlimited capacity for all-inclusive love, His death on the cross the ultimate act of altruism.

Jesus's command to love our neighbor as ourselves tells us to value our neighbor's needs as (i.e., equally) we value our own needs. He admits this is difficult for the powerful and wealthy, who need the sense of importance their power and wealth give them. Through parables and example, Jesus demonstrated the way of love as giving and receiving so as to free them from their concerns for self - from illness, injury, pain, oppression, guilt, resentments, fears, family, possessions - so that their loving could be unlimited. He defined our "neighbor" as all others - the rich, the poor, the sick, the well, the weak, the strong, young and old, men and women, saints and sinners, those who have hurt us and those we have hurt, the less-than-human (lepers), the hated (Samaritans), and the feared (enemies).

All-inclusive love has no body identity, no gender, no racial, ethnic, class, or sectarian identity. Although difficult to describe in concrete form, if we think of it as a potential in ourselves and in all we meet, we can accept our responsibility for nurturing that potential by loving as Jesus loved. Thus envisioned, it can save both women and men of all races and stations.

Jesus's maleness, therefore, is not central to the redemptive mystery. It is a product of time and place more than anything else. The fully human embodiment of the divine image of love in which all humans are created had to be either male or female; given the cultural context of his time and the Old Testament background, I can think of several reasons why Jesus was male. In his time - and indeed in ours today - women were not likely tp be taken seriously as the long-awaited Savior. (The relatively modern pejorative "hysterical female" seems the most likely reaction.) Besides, as the holders of power and wealth in both the secular and religious communities, men had the greater need for Jesus's lessons of equal valuing concern for all others and Jesus was a credible role model with whom they could identify. This is not to say that women, too, do not need a credible, fully human representative of divine love with whom to identify. They do. I suspect women in Jesus's time recognized and identified with his lovingness, but such a personal response to Jesus can be difficult to sustain today.

I have a quibble with Ms. Alliaume's parenthetical remark, "after all, he cried out on his cross and God did not answer." That is the standard interpretation, a very human one, but I suggest another. Jesus fully expected to be with the Father. Immediately after he cried out in despair, he gave up his life. God did answer him, ending his suffering and fulfilling Jesus's expectations. By doing so, God proved that he had not abandoned Jesus. Only our human fear of death made it seem that he had.

MARILYN M. KRAMER Wausaw, Wisc.

U.S. Postal Service STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP, MANAGEMENT AND CIRCULATION (required by 39 U.S.C. 3685). 1. Title of Publication, CROSS CURRENTS. 2. Publication no., 0011-1953. 3. Date of Filing, September 9, 1998. 4. Frequency of issue, quarterly. 5. Number of issues published annually, 4. 6. Annual subscription price, $30. 7. Complete Mailing Address of Known Office of Publication, College of New Rochelle, New Rochelle, NY 10805-2339. 8. Complete Mailing Address of the Headquarters of General Business Offices of the Publishers, same. 9. Names and Complete Mailing Address of Publisher, Editor, and Managing Editor: Publisher, Association for Religion and Intellectual Life, College of New Rochelle, New Rochelle, NY 10805-2339; Co-Editors: Kenneth Arnold, 275 W. 96th St., New York, NY 10025; Joseph Cunneen, 103 Van Houten Fields, West Nyack, NY 10994; Managing Editor: Shelley Schiff, 50 Pintard Ave., New Rochelle, NY 10805. 10. Owner: Association for Religion and Intellectual Life, College of New Rochelle, New Rochelle, NY 10805-2339; President: The Rev. Joseph C. Williamson, Murray-Dodge Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544; Vice-Presidents: Hasia R. Diner, 7 E. 12th St., 9th Fl., New York, NY 10003, and Mark R. Schwehn, Valparaiso University, Valparaiso, IN 46386; Secretary: Beverly Coyle, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY 12601; Treasurer: John B. Caron, 8 Laurel Lane, Greenwich, CT, 06830-3821; 11. Known Bondholders, Mortgagees, and other Security Holders Drawing or Holding 1 Percent or More of Total Amount of Bonds, Mortgages, or other Securities: None. 12. For completion by Non-Profit Organization Authorized to Mail at Special Rates: The purpose, function and non-profit status of this organization and the exempt status for Federal income tax purposes has not changed during preceding twelve months. 13. Publication Name: Cross Currents. 14. Issue Date for Circulation Data Below. 15 a. Total No. Copies (net press run): average no. copies each issue during preceding 12 months: 5140; actual no. copies of single published nearest to filing date, 5000. b. Paid and/or Requested Circulation: (1) Sales through dealers and carriers, street vendors and counter sales: 736, 672. (2) Mail subscriptions: 3757, 3830. c. Total Paid and/or Requested Circulation: 4493, 4502. d. Free distribution by Mail: 210, 193. e. Free distribution outside the mail, 0, 0. f. Total Free Distribution: 210, 193. g. Total Distribution: 4703, 4695. h. Copies Not Distributed: (1) Office use, left over, unaccounted, spoiled after printing: 437, 305. (2) Return from news agents: None. i. Total: 5140, 5000. Percent Paid and/or Requested Circulation: 91%, 95%. 16. This Statement of Ownership will be printed in the Fall issue of this publication. 17. Signature and Title of Managing Editor: Shelley Schiff. Date: September 9, 1998. I certify that all information furnished on this form is true and complete.