Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,607,059 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Chimicles & Tikellis LLP Announce Approval of Settlement in Re Phoenix Leasing Limited Partnership Litigation.


Business Editors

PHILADELPHIA--(BUSINESS WIRE)--March 1, 2002

Chimicles & Tikellis LLP LLP - Lower Layer Protocol  of Haverford, PA announces the approval of the settlement of In re Phoenix Leasing Limited Partnership Litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute.

When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation.
, a class action filed against Phoenix American, Inc., of San Mateo, California San Mateo is a city in San Mateo County, California, in the San Francisco Bay Area. It is one of the larger suburbs on the San Francisco Peninsula, located between Burlingame to the north, Foster City to the East, and Belmont to the south.  and its subsidiaries, Phoenix Leasing Incorporated; Phoenix Leasing Associates II, L.P.; Phoenix Leasing Associates II, Inc. and Phoenix Securities, Inc.

The Consolidated Complaint asserted claims of fraud, misrepresentation misrepresentation

In law, any false or misleading expression of fact, usually with the intent to deceive or defraud. It most commonly occurs in insurance and real-estate contracts. False advertising may also constitute misrepresentation.
 and breach of fiduciary in connection with Phoenix Leasing Cash Distribution Funds I through V, limited partnerships organized and operated by the Defendants under California law California Law consists of 29 codes, covering various subject areas, the State Constitution and Statutes. See also
  • Statute
  • Bill (proposed law)
  • California State Legislature
External links
  • http://www.leginfo.ca.
 to purchase computer and other equipment for lease to third parties. The Class comprises approximately 40,000 persons located nationwide who invested more than $449.5 million in the Partnerships and who are estimated to have lost $31.5 million of their capital.

The case was settled shortly before a scheduled trial in Third Quarter 2001. The settlement fund has a current value of $11,700,000, with an additional $10 million to be recovered from the insurance policy covering the Defendants that was underwritten by Reliance Insurance Company, which is now in liquidation The collection of assets belonging to a debtor to be applied to the discharge of his or her outstanding debts.

A type of proceeding pursuant to federal Bankruptcy
. The Settlement Fund comprises payments made by Defendants' primary and first excess insurance carriers, which paid in their full policy limits, and a $500,000 payment by Defendants. Additionally, Defendants assigned to the Class all of their rights and entitlements under the Reliance policy, and Defendants consented to the Court's entry of judgment against them so that the Class's rights to collect proceeds under the Reliance policy are triggered. Class Counsel will now pursue the interests of the Class to collect the proceeds under the Reliance policy.

Notice of the settlement was sent to the Claims in November 2001. Not a single objection was made to the settlement. On February 19, 2002, following a hearing on the fairness of the settlement, the Honorable M. Lynn Duryee of the Superior Court of California for Marin County signed the final order approving the settlement and the plan of allocation. Judge Duryee also awarded in full the requested amount of attorneys' fees and litigation expenses. The Judge also approved incentive awards to the eight named plaintiffs who had been deposed and otherwise involved in discovery. Co-Lead Counsel Nicholas E. Chimicles of Chimicles & Tikellis LLP and Joel H. Bernstein of Goodkind Labaton Rudoff & Sucharow LLP are pleased with the settlement and believe it is an excellent outcome for the named plaintiffs and the Class.

Co-Lead Counsel have extensive experience in securities class action litigation and litigation specifically dealing with limited partnerships as a form of investment and as a form of business organization. Collectively, Co-Lead Counsel have recovered hundreds of millions of dollars on behalf of limited partnership investors in federal and state courts throughout the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area. . In the course of the last ten years Co-Lead Counsel, Chimicles & Tikellis LLP and Goodkind, Labaton, Rudoff & Sucharow LLP, have been involved in the development of case law regarding the protection of investors in public limited partnerships. Co-Lead Counsel have represented investor classes in landmark cases including In re Prudential Securities Inc. Limited Partnerships Litigation, and In re Paine Webber Paine Webber and Company was an American stock brokerage firm that was acquired by the Swiss bank UBS AG in 2000. The company was founded in 1880 in Boston, Massachusetts, by William Alfred Paine and Wallace G. Webber.  Inc. Limited Partnerships Litigation.

The parties had vigorously litigated this Action since it was filed in 1997. A memorandum of understanding A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) is a legal document describing a bilateral or multilateral agreement between parties. It expresses a convergence of will between the parties, indicating an intended common line of action and may not imply a legal commitment.  was reached in July 2002, following four court-ordered mediation sessions. The settlement was signed in October 2002.

Defendants were represented by David M. Balabanian and Mary T. Huser of McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, LLP of San Francisco, California “San Francisco” redirects here. For other uses, see San Francisco (disambiguation).

The City and County of San Francisco (EN IPA: [sænfrənˈsɪskoʊ] 
.
COPYRIGHT 2002 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Mar 1, 2002
Words:582
Previous Article:PerkinElmer Reorganizes Optoelectronics Unit; Lowers 2002 Guidance.
Next Article:Corporate Profile for Pioneer Natural Resources, dated March 1, 2002.
Topics:



Related Articles
Phoenix settles $47.5M in outstanding debt.
EX-AGENT VEXED OVER ALLSTATE'S MASS FIRINGS.
MORE RESIDENTS SEEKING DAMAGES FROM LOCKHEED.
Class action lawsuit reform fails to pass.
Broad Street development signs two new leases.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles