Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,799,441 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Childers v. Maloney.


U.S. District Court

WORK

TRANSFER

LIBERTY INTEREST

Childers v. Maloney, 247 F.Supp.2d 32 (D.Mass. 2003). A state prisoner one in confinement, or under arrest, for a political offense.

See also: State
 sued prison officials alleging violation of his due process rights during a prison disciplinary hearing. The district court dismissed the action. The court held that the prisoner's liberty interests were not infringed upon by his loss of visitation VISITATION. The act of examining into the affairs of a corporation.
     2. The power of visitation is applicable only to ecclesiastical and eleemosynary corporations. 1 Bl. Com. 480; 2 Kid on Corp. 174.
 for six weeks, placement in isolation, and transfer to another prison as discipline for violation of prison regulations. The court found that the prisoner did not have a liberty interest, under state law, in his position as "Minority Co-Camp Chairman." The court noted that the statute authorizing the corrections commissioner to establish work programs in prisons did not indicate any limitations on the commissioner's discretion to suspend or revoke To annul or make void by recalling or taking back; to cancel, rescind, repeal, or reverse.


revoke v. to annul or cancel an act, particularly a statement, document, or promise, as if it no longer existed.
 the prisoner's position. (Old Colony Correctional Center, Massachusetts Massachusetts (măsəch`sĭts), most populous of the New England states of the NE United States. )
COPYRIGHT 2003 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:prisoner sues prison officials for violating his due process rights
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U1MA
Date:Aug 1, 2003
Words:137
Previous Article:Davis v. Milwaukee County.(prison discipline)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Serrano v. Francis.(DISCIPLINE)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. District Court: EXERCISE RETALIATION.(Brief Article)
U.S. District Court: RESTRAINTS.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
Liability.
Rules and regulations- prisoner.
Espinoza v. Peterson.(DISCIPLINE)(Brief Article)
Espinoza v. Peterson.(HABEAS CORPUS)(violation of due process of law)(Brief Article)
Sira v. Morton.(violation of due process of law)(Brief Article)
Vance v. Barrett.(prisoners sues prison officials for violating their constitutional rights)(Brief Article)
Vance v. Barrett.(violation of due process of law)(Brief Article)
Phelps v. Tucker.(civil rights action )(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles