Chevalier.
Using a sample of firms that undertook diversifying mergers between
1980 and 1995, Chevalier examines the investment behavior of these firms
prior to their mergers. She shows that the investment patterns
attributed in the literature to "cross-subsidization between
divisions" are apparent in the pairs of merging firms prior to
their mergers. Thus some of the cross-subsidization results in the
literature may be attributable to selection bias. Chevalier also
examines stock market responses to the announcement of diversifying
acquisitions. The market believes that these acquisitions will create
value. The event response to the merger is largely independent of
measures of the extent to which the merger is diversifying, she finds.
COPYRIGHT 2000 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2000 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
|
Reader Opinion