Printer Friendly
The Free Library
23,396,934 articles and books

Chemical composition of selected forages and spices and the effect of these spices on in vitro rumen degradability of some forages.


Ruminant animals are mainly dependent on forages as these are essential to maintain their health and production at various stages of their development and growth. In developed countries, sufficient grazing land is available so ruminants can get adequate amount of green grasses during grazing seasons and when it is not possible in other season they are supplied with silage and other high quality conserved forages. Conversely, green forages are not abundantly available in some developing countries, so ruminants are mainly supplied with low quality forages (LQF) like cereal straws. The longevity and production are adversely affected when ruminants are reared with poor quality forage. To get more production from these ruminants it is necessary to enhance the utilization of these LQF. It may be possible to increase the nutritive value of these low quality forages through either biological or chemical procedures (Chaudhry, 1998). During the last five decades many studies were done to improve the quality of these forages by using different biochemical treatments. But improving the quality of forages by using these treatments was not always successful. Supplementation is another tool to improve the quality of LQF by adding nutrients that otherwise are low in these forages (Khandaker et al., 1998; Muetzel et al., 2003; Chaudhry, 2008). Supplements increase the utilization of LQF, but the requirement for these supplements is more than their availability in many developing countries (Devendra and Sevilla, 2002).

Spices which have long been safely used for human consumption could be tested as alternative supplements to enhance forage utilization and reduce nutrient wastage from ruminant livestock. Recently several researchers have used some plant extracts to manipulate rumen fermentation (Cardozo et al., 2004; Busquet et al., 2005; Patra et al., 2006a). But obtaining these extracts from plants will be costly as the extraction process will require expensive instruments and the farmers from developing countries will not be able to afford such technology. Besides, only a small quantity of these plants will be available as extracts and the rest of such plants will be unused and wasted. Furthermore, the whole spices may contain some other useful components that can differ from their small amounts of extracts and these also can have more desirable impacts on degradability and fermentation. Therefore, it is necessary to chemically analyze these spices before testing their potential use as supplements for LQF consuming ruminants to enhance forage degradability. Therefore, this study evaluated four different spices alongside three LQF for their chemical components in order to examine the suitability of different levels of these spices on the in vitro rumen degradability of LQF at different incubation times.


Experimental work plan

A series of laboratory experiments were conducted to characterize selected spices and LQF for their chemical composition and then the effect of these spices on in vitro rumen degradability of LQF. Different methods were used to determine chemical compositions of three forages; rice straw (Oryza sativa), wheat straw (Triticum Sp) and rye grass hay (Lolium perenne) and four spices; turmeric (Curcuma longa), cinnamon (Cinnamomum cassia), cumin (Cuminum cyminum) and clove (Syzygium aromaticum). A 3x4x4 factorial arrangement in duplicate for each incubation time of 20 h, 40 h and 60 h was used to assess the degradability of three forages with four spices at four levels of 0, 10, 30 and 90 mg/g forage DM. Further details are given in the following sections:

Collection of forages and spices : Representative samples of rice straw (Variety, IR50) were collected from Bangladesh, whereas those of wheat straw (Variety, Einstein), and ryegrass hay were collected from the Newcastle University's Farm. Spice samples (cinnamon, cumin, clove and turmeric) of Indian origin were collected from the local market of Newcastle upon Tyne. The samples of forages and spices were dried at 60[degrees]C in an oven and ground through a 1 mm sieve by using a grinder (Christy mill, Christy and Norris Ltd, Suffolk, United Kingdom).

Chemical composition of forages and spices : All chemicals and reagents used in this study were obtained either from Fischer Scientific UK or VWR unless otherwise stated for the determination of different chemical components as described in the following sections.

Proximate and cell wall composition

All samples of forage and spices were analyzed in triplicate for DM, ash and ether extract (EE) by using methods of AOAC (1990). All these samples were analyzed for EE with the help of soxhlet apparatus. Nitrogen (N) contents of these samples were determined by using Leco (model FP-428, Leco corporation St. Joseph. MI, USA) N determinator (Sweeney and Rexroad, 1987) where the samples were combusted by the Dumas method to obtain N values. The N contents were multiplied with 6.25 to determine the CP. Acid detergent fibre (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL) and neutral detergent fibre (NDF) of different forages and spices were determined by the methods of Van Soest (1991) and Goering and Van Soest (1970) without sodium sulphite and Dekalin.

Total soluble sugars

Total soluble sugars (SS) were determined according to the method of Hall and Haczkaylo (1963) by mixing 1 g ground sample with 40 ml 80% ethanol while sonicating the mixture for 1 h in a conical flask. The contents were then filtered where the residue was used for starch determination and the supernatant was used for SS determination after evaporating the ethanol by using a vacuum evaporator. The evaporated aqueous solution was carefully transferred to a 100 ml volumetric flask and made up to volume with water. Diluted solution of 1 ml was taken in a test tube to which 4 ml anthrone reagent (2% in concentrated [H.sub.2]S[O.sub.4]) was added and the contents mixed thoroughly. The intensity of the colour developed due to the presence of sugar was measured at 620 nm in a spectrophotometer (Biochrom Libra, S12). A standard curve was prepared from the known concentrations of pure glucose and SS in these samples and their relevant concentrations were calculated with reference to the standard curve.

Starch, oligosaccharides and non cellulose carbohydrates

The starch and oligosaccharides (SO) analysis was performed according to the method of Kent-Jones and Amos (1967). The residue of an alcohol washed sample was refluxed for 2.5 h with 100 ml/L HCl solution. It was cooled and neutralized with 5 N NaOH solution. The hydrolyzed sample was then titrated against the standardized freshly made Fehling's solution to determine the reducing sugar contents (Lewis and Lane, 1931). It comprised of equal parts of the two solutions; Fehling's solution A (6.928% CuS[O.sub.4].5[H.sub.2]O in distilled water) and Fehling's Solution B (34.6% Rochelle salt and 12% NaOH in distilled water). During refluxing the residue, some other carbohydrates were also converted to monosaccharides. To correct it, the values for reducing sugars were converted into starch contents by multiplying with the factor 0.9 (Kent-Jones and Amos, 1967). Non cellulose carbohydrates (NCC) were calculated by adding the value of SS and SO.

Total phenolics

The Folin-Ciocalteu method (Singleton and Rossi, 1965) with some modification was used to determine total phenolics (TP). Extracts for the TP determination were prepared by suspending 0.125 g samples in 6.25 ml of 75% aqueous acetone in test tubes. The contents of the test tubes were mixed at 5 minutes (min) intervals for 2 h and 20 min using a vortex mixer (Whirlimix, Fison Limited). Aliquots (1 ml) of each extract were mixed with 5 ml Folin-Ciocalteu reagent in 100 ml volumetric flasks that contained 70 ml of deionised water. After waiting for up to 8 min 15 ml of [Na.sub.2]C[O.sub.3] solution (20%) were added. The volumetric flasks were then made up to volume with deionised water. After standing for 2 h at room temperature, the absorbance was read at a wavelength of 760 nm in the visible range of the spectrum using a UV/VIS-spectrophotometer (Biochrom Libra, S12). The estimation of TP in extracts was carried out in duplicate for all samples. Gallic acid was used as a standard and the results obtained were expressed as mg gallic acid equivalent per g of sample DM.

Condensed tannins

Total condensed tannins (CT) were determined according to the method reported by Osman (2004) with some modifications. Extracts for the determination of CT were prepared by suspending 0.125 g samples in 6.25 ml of acidified methanol (1% HCl in methanol) in test tubes for 24 h. The contents of the test tubes were vortex mixed at 5 min and centrifuged for 6 min at 3,000 rpm. After centrifugation, extracts were assayed for CT. Vannilin HCl reagent was freshly prepared by mixing equal volumes of 8% HCl in methanol with 2% vanillin in methanol. One ml of supernatant was mixed with 5 ml of vanillin HCl reagent. The absorbance was read at 500 nm after 20 min of incubation at room temperature. Catechin was used as a standard and the results obtained were expressed as mg catechin equivalent per g of sample DM.

Total saponins

Total saponins (SP) were determined by the method of Hiai et al. (1976) as described by Makkar et al. (2007) with some modifications. Each sample of 0.5 g was vortex mixed in 10 ml of 80% aqueous methanol in separate test tubes for 4 h. The mixtures were kept at room temperature for 15 h after which the contents of the test tubes were centrifuged for 10 min at 3,000 rpm. The supernatant were collected in 25 ml volumetric flasks. The residue was washed three times, with 5 ml 800 ml/L aqueous methanol followed by vortex mixing. The supernatants were collected in the above volumetric flasks and made up to a volume of 25 ml with 80% aqueous methanol. In a test tube an aliquot (0.25 ml) was taken and 0.25 ml vanillin reagent (8% vanillin in ethanol) and 2.5 ml of 72% aqueous [H.sub.2]S[O.sub.4] were added. The contents in the tube were heated by placing these in a water bath at 60[degrees]C for 10 min. The tubes were cooled in ice for 4 min and then kept at room temperature (<20[degrees]C). The intensity of the colour developed due to the presence of SP was measured as optical density in a spectrophotometer (Biochrom Libra, S12) at 544 nm. Diosgenin was used as a standard and the results obtained were expressed as mg diosgenin equivalent per g of sample DM.

Macro and micro mineral contents

About 1 g dried and ground sample was placed into a Kjeldahl tube and 20 ml pure HN[O.sub.3] were added. The sample was digested in Kjeldahl digestion chamber at 100[degrees]C and the digested sample was diluted to the original volume of 20 ml with water. The samples were filtered through Whatman filter papers no 541 and the concentrations of selected minerals were determined with inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) with Unicam 701 ICP-OES. The machine was calibrated over the relevant concentrations using individually certified standards obtained from Sigma Aldrich, UK.

In vitro degradability trial

Collection of rumen fluid from fistulated sheep : Rumen fluid (RF) was obtained from two fistulated sheep (Lleyn breed) with mean live-weight of 81 kg just before their morning feeding. These sheep were managed under the Animal and Scientific Procedures Act 1986 of the UK. These sheep were consuming fixed amounts (1,200 g/d) of a diet comprising 65% chopped hay and 35% concentrate to fulfill their maintenance requirement (AFRC, 1993). The concentrate consisted of (% DM) soybean meal (20), maize gluten feed (15), rolled barley (27.5), sugar beet pulp (25), soy pass (2.5), molasses (7.5) and vitamin and mineral supplement (2.5). The RF was transported in insulated flasks under anaerobic conditions to the laboratory. The RF was strained through four layers of a cheese cloth into pre-warmed flasks under C[O.sub.2] before its mixing with the pre-warmed phosphate-bicarbonate (McDougall, 1948) buffer at 1:4 ratio to prepare the inoculum. The flasks were then screw capped and kept at 39[degrees]C in a water bath until used.

In vitro incubations, chemical analysis and calculations : Samples of about 0.4 g dried ground forage were separately weighed into test tubes, dried and ground spices were added according to the experimental work plan in the tubes to which 40 ml of the inoculum were added under C[O.sub.2]. The tubes were sealed with rubber stoppers containing pressure release valves and incubated at 39[degrees]C for the pre-determined times. After each time the tubes were submerged in ice to stop fermentation. The liquids and residues were separated by centrifuging the tubes at 3,000 rpm for 10 min. Residues were washed with distilled water and first dried at 60[degrees]C for 48 h and then ignited at 600[degrees]C for 5 h to determine their DM and OM contents respectively. These DM and OM values were then used to estimate in vitro DM (IVD) and OM (IVOMD) degradability of each treatment combination by using the following equation where A is either DM or OM:

IVD or IVOMD (g/kg) = [(g Sample A-g Residue A)/g Sample A] x 1,000

Statistical analyses

The data for the chemical composition were analyzed by using the analysis of variance in General Linear Model of Minitab to compare different materials within each group of forages and spices for each chemical component at p<0.05. Individual means of chemical components within each group of feeds were compared by using the Tukey's t-test at p<0.05. Standard errors were also calculated where needed to show variation within and between different feed sample groups for the means of different components at p<0.05. The data of IVD and IVOMD were also analyzed by using General Linear Model of Minitab in a 3 x 4 x 4 factorial arrangement. The main effects of three forages, four spices and four levels and their interactions on each of the IVD and IVOMD were considered for each incubation time. The means of each treatment factor and combination were tested for significance at p<0.05 by using the Tukey's test. The data were further analyzed by using the Pearson's Correlation in Minitab to study possible relationships as determined by 'r' between different chemical components and in vitro degradability of various forages of this study. However, only the satisfactory (p<0.05) correlation coefficients are presented in this paper.


Chemical compositions of forages and spices

Mean proximate and fibre contents of different forages and spices are given in Table 1. Significant differences (p<0.03) were observed between forages for CP, ash, NDF and ADF where hay contained more CP but less ADF than other two forages (p<0.002). In contrast hay contained less NDF than wheat straw but more than rice straw (p<0.03). Among forages, rice straw had more CP and less NDF, ADF and ADL than wheat straw but more ash than wheat straw and hay. These forages did not differ significantly for EE (p>0.05). The spices also differed significantly (p<0.003) for all chemical components. Maximum CP and EE were found in cumin (p<0.002) which contained more than double the amount of CP than other spices. Clove contained the highest and cinnamon contained the lowest amount of ash (p<0.001). Cumin contained the highest NDF whereas cinnamon contained the highest ADL (p<0.001) but turmeric contained the lowest ADF and second lowest NDF compared to the other spices (p<0.003).

Table 2 shows significant differences between different forages and spices for TP, CT, SS, SO and NCC (p<0.03). The forages differed significantly (p<0.001) but not spices (p>0.05) for SP. Among forages hay contained the highest and wheat straw the lowest TP, SS and NCC (p<0.05). In spices, TP was highest in clove and lowest in cumin (p<0.001) whereas CT and SP were highest in cinnamon and SS, SO and NCC were highest in turmeric (p<0.001). Cumin contained the second highest whereas cinnamon the lowest SS but cumin contained the lowest SO and NCC contents than other spices.

Different forages and spices varied significantly (p<0.001) for most minerals (Table 3). Within forages, hay contained the highest Ca, PHOS, Cu, Co and Zn whereas rice straw contained the highest Na, K, Mg and Mn and wheat straw contained the lowest amounts of most minerals. Within spices, cumin contained the highest amounts of PHOS, Se and Zn whereas cinnamon contained the lowest amounts of most minerals except Ca which compared well with clove (p>0.05) and Mn which was much greater than turmeric and cumin (p<0.001). Clove contained the highest Ca, Mn and Mg and turmeric was highest for K and Cu.

Effects of spice supplementation on IVD and IVOMD of forages

The main effects of forage type, spice type and spice levels and most of their 2 and 3 way interactions were significant for IVD and IVOMD at each incubation time (p<0.001) as shown in Table 4 and 5, respectively. IVD and IVOMD were greater for longer incubation times which were not statistically compared in this study. IVD and IVOMD were highest for hay and lowest for wheat straw at all the incubation times (p<0.001) with all spices. IVD and IVOMD were greater at 10 mg/g forage DM than other spice levels. Cinnamon, clove and turmeric were more effective for 10 mg/g level but cumin was more effective at higher spice levels, hence suggesting spice x level interactions at different incubation times (Tables 4 and 5). At 20 and 60 h, IVD was highest for turmeric whereas at 40 h IVD was highest for cumin (p<0.001). IVOMD was highest for turmeric and cumin at 20 h, for cumin and cinnamon at 40 h and for turmeric at 60 h (Table 5).

At 20 h incubation, the maximum IVD of hay, rice straw and wheat straw were in the presence of turmeric, cumin and clove respectively. At 40 h the maximum IVD of hay and rice straw were found in cumin and maximum IVD of wheat straw was found in cinnamon with a significant forage x spice interaction (p<0.001). The IVD and IVOMD values changed with the spice type and spice level but the extent of changes depended on the forage type specially at 40 and 60 h of in vitro rumen incubations with a significant 3 way interaction (p<0.01; Tables 3 and 4).

Relationships between forage IVD and saponins, condensed tannins, total phenolics, CP and soluble sugars of forage and supplement

Forage IVD were negatively correlated with SP, CT and TP when each forage IVD was separately correlated with these components (Figures 1-8). However, this correlation did not exist when the mean IVD being averaged over all forages were correlated with these components. At 20 h all the forage showed negative correlation (r) between IVD of forage and SP and the r values (RS = -0.297; WS = -0.390; Hay = -0.505) were significant (p<0.03) for wheat straw and hay. At 40 h the r values were not significant but at 60 h negative correlation between IVD of forage and SP was observed where the r values (RS = -0.434; WS = -0.364; Hay = -0.397) were significant (p<0.05) for all forages. Like SP, CT also had negative correlation with IVD of forages at 20 h. The r values (RS = -0.517; WS = -0.412; Hay = -0.569) were significant (p<0.02) for all forages at 20 h. The correlations between CT and IVD of forages were negative at 40 h for rice straw and hay but not statistically significant. At 60 h the r values (RS = -0.523; WS = -0.504; Hay = -0.461) were negative and significant (p<0.05) for all forages. The correlations between TP and IVD of forages were also negative but not statistically significant; however the r values were significant for rice straw at 60 h and for hay at 20 h (p<0.04).








The CP and SS had positive correlations with IVD of forages. When all the three forages were considered together in the presence of spices then significantly (p<0.001) positive correlation was observed between total CP and SS content and IVD of forages. The correlation, r, values between total CP and IVD of forages were 0.538, 0.648 and 0.521 at 20, 40 and 60 h respectively and correlation values between SS and IVD of forages were 0.678, 0.702 and 0.7 at 20, 40 and 60 h respectively. If the individual forage is considered then the correlation between total CP and IVD of wheat straw and hay were significant (p<0.04) at 40 h and the r values were 0.481 and 0.371, respectively. The correlation between SS and IVD of forages were significantly (p<0.02) positive for rice straw at 20 h and for hay at 20 and 60 h and the r values were 0.410, 0.501 and 0.489, respectively.

Relationships between forage IVD and mineral contents of forage and supplement

Some minerals like calcium (Ca), phosphorus (PHOS) and copper (Cu) showed positive correlation with IVD of forages. When all the three forages were considered together in the presence of spices then significantly (p<0.001) positive correlation was observed between the above mentioned minerals and IVD of forages. The correlation between PHOS and IVD of forages were significantly (p<0.03) positive for rice straw and hay at 20 and 60 h. The correlation values between PHOS and IVD of rice straw were 0.439 and 0.4 at 20 and 60 h respectively and the correlation values between PHOS and IVD of hay were 0.528 and 0.397 at 20 and 60 h respectively. Ca showed significantly (p<0.001) positive correlation with IVD of wheat straw at 40 h. The correlation between Cu and IVD of forages were not significant for individual forages.



Chemical composition of the forages

The aim of the present study was to characterize the forages and spices and then test the effect of different levels of these spices on the in vitro degradability of these forages. The ash, CP, EE, NDF and ADF of rice and wheat straw of this study were similar to the finding of other researchers (Jackson, 1977; Khandaker et al., 1998; Chaudhry, 1998; Pan and Sano, 2005). The higher ash content of rice straw than all other forages or spices might have been partly due to the higher amount of silica (Jackson, 1977; Van Soest, 2006) and other minerals.

Phenolic compounds, tannins and SP are known as antinutritional factors due to their detrimental effects on ruminant nutrition (Makkar, 2003; Patra, 2007). High level of tannins in diet (6-12% DM) may depress digestive efficiency and animal productivity (Patra, 2007). But recently it was reported that low amount of tannins and SP had some positive effect on ruminant nutrition (Min et al., 2003; Muetzel et al., 2003). Low level of CT (2-4.5% DM) improved efficiency of N use and increased daily weight gain in lambs consuming temperate forages (Min et al., 2003). The low CT and SP contents (<1% DM) of LQF might be of less interference for rumen fermentation. Due to very low amount of tannins wheat straw is used as a tannin free component in ruminant nutrition research (Canbolat et al., 2007). In the present study TP and SP contents of hay were higher than the other two forages and CT content was higher than wheat straw but these values were within the acceptable range for its use as ruminant feed.

Higher amount of certain minerals increased the nutritive value of hay because these minerals are essential for ruminants for their normal functioning but these minerals are normally deficit in low quality forages. Positive correlation between the forage IVD and Ca, PHOS and Cu showed that these minerals were necessary to increase the forage degradability. Rice straw being an exceptional forage containing high levels of most minerals could be under utilized as ruminant feed due to its deficiency in some vital minerals like PHOS and Cu as reported by McDonald et al. (2002) and other researchers (Jackson, 1977). If animal feed is low in phosphorus, the animal cannot use energy properly which results in an energy deficient animal (Ammerman and Goodrich, 1983). Adding Cu to the diet of ruminants increased rumen microbial activity and enhanced forage digestion (Harris et al., 2003). So, PHOS and Cu supplementation should be able to increase the degradability of rice straw in ruminants. Wheat straw was low in most of the minerals which was also reported by Makled (1974). In the absence of other supplements, grass hay may be able to slightly compensate for the mineral deficiency of cereal straws if it is offered to the ruminants that are consuming cereal straws. From the chemical composition it can be assumed that among these three forages the nutritive value was highest for hay and lowest for wheat straw.

Chemical composition of the spices

It appears that the spices have the potential to be used as supplements due to their relatively higher CP, EE and SS than forages being observed in this study. Several researchers (Ali et al., 1992; Khanum et al., 2001) also found higher amount of EE, CP and SS in cumin. Although cinnamon and turmeric contained lower amounts of CP and EE than other spices these values were comparable to those of other researchers (Khanum et al., 2001; Braga et al., 2003) for similar spices but these values were higher than the experimental forages. Indeed, the large amounts of SS and SO in turmeric of this study compared well with the values of Braga et al. (2003). The higher CP and EE of clove than cinnamon and turmeric were also comparable to the previous report (Khanum et al., 2001). Due to the better nutrient composition compared with these forages, appropriate amounts of spices could be used as supplements to improve the utilization of these forages by ruminants.

The higher amounts of TP, CT and SP in cinnamon, clove and turmeric of this paper were comparable to the values reported by other researchers (Bamdad et al., 2006; Jayaprakasha et al., 2005; Singh et al., 2004; Variyar et al., 1998) who also found higher amount of TP in clove, cinnamon and turmeric. The greater amounts of TP in cinnamon and clove may also have contributed to their high ADL contents (Table 1).

Here spices being rich in many of these minerals could be used as another source to compensate for the deficits of relevant minerals in these forages. The mineral compositions of these spices were comparable to the result of other researchers (Ozkutlu et al., 2007; Ozcan and Akbulut, 2008). If combined with forages cumin containing highest amount of Zn, PHOS and Se and higher amount of Ca, Mg, Cu and Co would increase the utilization of low quality forages in ruminants. Higher amount of Ca, K and Mn in clove and higher Cu and PHOS in turmeric than low quality forages might also be helpful to increase the utilization of low quality forages in ruminants. However, extremely high amount of Mn (NRC, 1996) in clove and cinnamon deserves careful attention if these two spices to be used as supplements for low quality forages in order to avoid any potential detrimental effect of these high Mn containing spices on forage utilization.

Effect of spices on forage degradability

The better nutrient composition of hay might have helped increase the IVD and IVOMD of hay especially in the presence of spices than other two forages. Conversely the lower IVD and IVOMD of wheat straw with or without spices might be due to its lower CP, SS and minerals and higher fibre contents (Tables 1, 2 and 3). Wheat straw showed positive response with spices at 40 h only. The response of spices on forages was greater at 40 h than 20 h where IVD and IVOMD of all forages were higher in the presence of spices than the absence of spices. This longer duration of 40 h might have given the anaerobic microbes in the rumen fluid the opportunity to adapt better to provide more favourable in vitro fermentation conditions (Cardozo et al., 2004).

The antimicrobial effect of TP, CT and SP of clove and cinnamon might have reduced the IVD and IVOMD of forages in the presence of higher level of these spices as higher CT, SP and TP showed negative correlations with IVD of forages. Patra (2007) reported that, high level of tannins in diet (60-120 g/kg DM) might depress digestive efficiency. SP can kill or damage protozoa (Hu et al., 2005), which have some important role in fibre digestion (Mould and 0rskov, 1983). As cinnamon was highest in SP and CT contents its higher level might caused decreases in IVD and IVOMD of forages at all incubation times. Busquet et al. (2005) reported that cinnamaldehyde, an active compound of cinnamon, decreased fibre digestibility in a dual flow continuous culture.

Higher level of clove containing high amount TP might have reduced the forage IVD and IVOMD at high level as TP had negative correlation with IVD of some forages. Clove was lower in CP and EE than cumin but higher than cinnamon and SS was lower than turmeric and cumin but higher than cinnamon (Tables 1 and 2), which might have affected the forage IVD. Patra et al. (2006b) observed that methanol and ethanol extracts of clove depressed IVD of wheat straw based forage. They also observed lower protozoa counts in the presence of clove extract. Clove was extremely high in Mn and Ca contents but lower in PHOS, Cu and Zn contents (Table 3) which are necessary for proper microbial growth and many enzymatic reactions both in ruminants and microbes (McDonald et al., 2002) and low amount of these minerals in cloves might have reduced IVD of forages in the presence of clove.

The higher amount of CP, EE and SS and important minerals like Ca, PHOS, Cu, Co, Mn and Zn of cumin (Tables 1 , 2 and 3), that were deficit in low quality forages, might have increased the IVD and IVOMD of forages. These higher mineral contents might have compensated for the mineral deficiency in low quality forages which in combination with higher CP might have increased IVD and IVOMD as Ca, PHOS and Cu showed positive correlations with the IVD of forages.

The high amount of SS of turmeric might have increased the IVD and IVOMD initially at 20 h, but when the sugars were utilized by the microbes IVD was leveled off at 40 h while its SO contents could have been degraded into glucose which helped increase IVD and IVOMD again at 60 h. Higher Cu content of turmeric (Table 3) also might have increased the forage degradability at longer time. Higher amount of CT and SP of turmeric (Table 2) might have reduced the IVD and IVOMD of forages in the presence of high level; on the other hand lower TP, CT containing cumin increased IVD and IVOMD of forages at higher spice level.

For optimizing rumen microbial yield through better utilization of high CP containing forage, additional SS are needed as a supplement (Hoover and Stokes, 1991; Bach et al., 2005). This argument was supported by the results of this study where higher CP containing forage, hay, showed better performance in the presence of turmeric at 20 h as this spice had higher SS and SO. IVD of hay also showed significantly positive correlation with SS. On the other hand, as rice straw was lower in CP content it performed better in the presence of higher CP containing cumin at both 20 and 40 h.

It appears that SS might be beneficial in improving the IVD and IVOMD during shorter incubations as SS had positive correlation with the forage IVD at 20 h, whereas starch and CP would be more effective in improving the IVD over longer incubation times as CP showed positive correlation with IVD of forages at 40 h. Higher CT, SP and TP had a negative effect on forage degradability as these three components showed negative correlation with IVD of forages. The study suggested that the spices containing reasonable amounts of minerals such as Ca, PHOS, Cu, Co and Zn can play an important role in the forage degradation by the ruminant animals.


It appears that the spices being moderate to high nutrient containing materials have the potential for their use as supplements for forages. As these spices also contained low to high amounts of phenolics, tannins, saponins and essential minerals their use in ruminant diets may help modify the rumen fermentation and so the utilization of low quality forages in ruminants. This study showed that spices can manipulate rumen degradation but the extent of their effect varied with the spice type and level, incubation time and also forage types. Among the spices turmeric and cumin showed more effect on the IVD and IVOMD of the forages. While higher amounts of total phenolics, condensed tannins, saponins and manganese in clove and cinnamon did not show positive effect on the in vitro rumen degradability of forages, their careful use in ruminant diets may help modify the rumen fermentation process in order to modify forage utilization and reduce the nutrient wastage by the ruminants. Further studies are looking at the effect of different levels of these spices on forage fermentation profiles and total gas and methane production in ruminants.


Mr. Khan is grateful to receive UK's ORS award and funding from the Perry Foundation and Sylhet Agricultural University, Bangladesh.


AFRC. 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon OX10 8DE, UK. 175.

Ali, S. M. K., M. A. Malek, K. Jahan and Q. Salamtullah. 1992. Deshio Khaddodrobber pushtiman (Nutritive value of indigenous food). 4th ed. Nutrition and Food Sci. Institute, Dhaka University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Ammerman, C. B. and R. D. Goodrich. 1983. Advances in mineral nutrition in ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 57(Suppl. 2):519-533.

AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.

Bach, A., S. Calsamiglia and M. D. Stern. 2005. Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. J. Dairy Sci. 88(e Suppl 1):E9-21.

Bamdad, F., M. Kadivar and J. Keramat. 2006. Evaluation of phenolic content and antioxidant activity of Iranian caraway in comparison with clove and BHT using model systems and vegetable oil. Intl. J. Food Sci. Technol. 41(Suppl. 1):20-27.

Braga, M. E., P. F. Leal, J. E. Carvalho and M. A. Meireles. 2003. Comparison of yield, composition, and antioxidant activity of turmeric (Curcuma longa) extracts obtained using various techniques. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51(22):6604-6611.

Busquet, M., S. Calsamiglia, A. Ferret, P. W. Cardozo and C. Kamel. 2005. Effects of cinnamaldehyde and garlic oil on rumen microbial fermentation in a dual flow continuous culture. J. Dairy Sci. 88(7):2508-2516.

Canbolat, O., C. O. Ozkan and A. Kamalak. 2007. Effects of NaOH treatment on condensed tannin contents and gas production kinetics of tree leaves (Special issue: Nutrition technologies in animal feed science and technology). Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 138(2):189-194.

Cardozo, P. W., S. Calsamiglia, A. Ferret and C. Kamel. 2004. Effects of natural plant extracts on ruminal protein degradation and fermentation profiles in continuous culture. J. Anim. Sci. 82(11):3230-3236.

Chaudhry, A. S. 1998. Chemical and biological procedures to upgrade cereal straws for ruminants. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 68(5):319-331.

Chaudhry, A. S. 2008. Slaughtered cattle as a source of rumen fluid to evaluate supplements for in vitro degradation of grass nuts and barley straw. Open Vet. Sci. J. 2:16-22.

Devendra, C. and C. C. Sevilla. 2002. Availability and use of feed resources in crop-animal systems in Asia. Agric. Syst. 71(1-2):59-73.

Goering, H. K. and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fibre analysis. In: Agriculture Hand book. US Department of Agriculture.

Hall, W. C. and J. Haczkaylo. 1963. Folin -Wu- Method for determination of glucose. In: Methods and procedures for plant biochemical research. The exchange stores, College Station, Texas.

Harris, B., A. L. Adams and H. H. Van Horn. 2003. Mineral needs of dairy cattle. Animal Science Department, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Florida, USA.

Hiai, S., H. Oura and T. Nakajima. 1976. Color reaction of some sapogenins and saponins with vanillin and sulphuric acid. Plant Med. 29:116-122.

Hoover, W. H. and S. R. Stokes. 1991. Balancing carbohydrates and protein for optimum rumen microbial yield. J. Dairy Sci. 74(10):3630-3644.

Hu, W., J. Liu, J. Ye, Y. Wu and Y. Guo. 2005. Effect of tea saponin on rumen fermentation in vitro. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 120(3/4):333-339.

Jackson, M. G. 1977. Rice straw as livestock feed. Wild Anim. Rev. 23:25-29.

Jayaprakasha, G. K., L. Jagan, R. Mohan and K. K. Sakariah. 2005. Chemistry and biological activities of C. longa. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 16(12):533-548.

Kent-Jones, D. W. and A. J. Amos. 1967. Modern cereal chemistry. 6th ed. The Northern Publishing Co. Ltd. Liverpool England.

Khandaker, Z. H., H. Steingass and W. Drochner. 1998. Supplementation of wheat straw with sesbania on voluntary intake, digestibility and ruminal fermentation in sheep. Small Rumin. Res. 28(1):23-29.

Khanum, F., K. R. Sudarshanakrishna, A. D. Semwal and K. R. Vishwanathan. 2001. Proximate composition and mineral contents of spices. Indian J. Nutr. Diet. 38(3):93-97.

Lewis, E. and J. H. Lane. 1931. The determination of small proportions of invert sugar in raw sugars. J. Soc. Chem. Ind. 50:85T-96T.

Makkar, H. P. S. 2003. Effects and fate of tannins in ruminant animals, adaptation to tannins, and strategies to overcome detrimental effects of feeding tannin-rich feeds (Special issue. Advanced research on the nutrition of sheep and goats, with special reference to pasture and rangeland use). Small Rumin. Res. 49:241-256.

Makkar, H. P. S., P. Siddhuraju and K. Becker. 2007. Plant secondary metabolites. Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ, USA.

Makled, M. N. 1974. Mineral composition of some common feedstuffs. Alex. J. Agric. Res. 22(1):23-28.

McDonald, P., R. A. Edwards, J. F. Greenhalgh and C. A. Morgan. 2002. Animal nutrition. Longman Group Limited Harlow.

McDougall, E. I. 1948. Studies on ruminant saliva. I. The composition and output of sheep's saliva. Biochem. J. 43:99-109.

Min, B. R., T. N. Barry, G. T. Attwood and W. C. McNabb. 2003. The effect of condensed tannins on the nutrition and health of ruminants fed fresh temperate forages: a review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 106(1-4):3-19.

Mould, F. L. and E. R. Orskov. 1983. Manipulation of rumen fluid pH and its influence on cellulolysis in sacco, dry matter degradation and the rumen microflora of sheep offered either hay or concentrate. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 10(1):1-14.

Muetzel, S., E. M. Hoffmann and K. Becker. 2003. Supplementation of barley straw with Sesbania pachycarpa leaves in vitro: effects on fermentation variables and rumen microbial population structure quantified by ribosomal RNA-targeted probes. Br. J. Nutr. 89(4):445-453.

NRC. 1996. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle. 7th ed. National Academic Press, Washington, DC.

Osman, M. A. 2004. Changes in sorghum enzyme inhibitors, phytic acid, tannins and in vitro protein digestibility occurring during Khamir (local bread) fermentation. Food Chem. 88(1):129-134.

Ozcan, M. M. and M. Akbulut. 2008. Estimation of minerals, nitrate and nitrite contents of medicinal and aromatic plants used as spices, condiments and herbal tea. Food Chem. 106(2):852-858.

Ozkutlu, F., S. M. Kara and N. Sekeroglu. 2007. Determination of mineral and trace elements in some spices cultivated in Turkey. Acta Hortic. 756:321-327.

Pan, X. and Y. Sano. 2005. Fractionation of wheat straw by atmospheric acetic acid process. Bioresour. Technol. 96(11):1256-1263.

Patra, A. K. 2007. Nutritional management in organic livestock farming for improved ruminant health and production--an overview. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 19(3):41.

Patra, A. K., D. N. Kamra and N. Agarwal. 2006a. Effect of plant extracts on in vitro methanogenesis, enzyme activities and fermentation of feed in rumen liquor of buffaloes. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 128(3-4):276-291.

Patra, A. K., D. N. Kamra and N. Agarwal. 2006b. Effect of spices on rumen fermentation, methanogenesis and protozoa counts in in vitro gas production test. Int. Congr. Ser. 1293:176-179.

Singh, U. P., D. P. Singh, S. Maurya, M. Ruchi, S. Mandavi, R. S. Dubey and R. B. Singh. 2004. Investigation on the phenolics of some spices having pharmacotherapeutic properties. J. Herb. Pharmacother. 4(4):27-42.

Singleton, V. L. and J. A. Rossi. 1965. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 16(3):144-158.

Sweeney, R. A. and P. R. Rexroad. 1987. Comparison of LECO FP-228 "nitrogen determinator" with AOAC copper catalyst Kjeldahl method for crude protein. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 70(6):1028-1030.

Van Soest, P. J. 2006. Rice straw, the role of silica and treatments to improve quality. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 130(3/4):137-171.

Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74(10):3583-3597.

Variyar, P. S., C. Bandyopadhyay and P. Thomas. 1998. Effect of gamma-irradiation on the phenolic acids of some Indian spices. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 33(6):533-537.

Mohammad Mehedi Hasan Khan * and Abdul Shakoor Chaudhry

School of Agriculture Food and Rural Development, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

* Corresponding Author: Mohammad Mehedi Hasan Khan. Tel: +447533939367, Fax: +441912226720, E-mail:

Received August 22, 2009; Accepted December 23, 2009
Table 1. Proximate composition (% DM, unless stated otherwise)
and fibre content (% DM) of different forages and spices

Feed groups   Feed types            DM %     Ash       CP       EE

Forages       Rice straw (RS)      95.1     16.1      4.08     1.21
              Wheat straw (WS)     93.9      5.9      2.32     1.56
              Ryegrass hay (HAY)   95.4      6.8      6.64     1.40
              SEM                   0.24     2.03     0.74     0.007
              p<                    0.03     0.002    0.002    0.2
Spices        Cinnamon (CIN)       95.1      4.28     7.4      3.4
              Clove (CLO)          92.3      8.50    10.2      7.3
              Turmeric (TUR)       95.2      6.94     8.6      2.6
              Cumin (CUM)          96.4      8.00    22.3     14.6
              SEM                   0.58     0.62     2.41     1.79
              p<                    0.002    0.001    0.001    0.002

Feed groups   Feed types            NDF      ADF      ADL

Forages       Rice straw (RS)      67.6     48.1     15.3
              Wheat straw (WS)     79.0     52.2     16.0
              Ryegrass hay (HAY)   74.7     41.3     15.6
              SEM                   2.21     2.79     0.626
              p<                    0.03     0.02     0.93
Spices        Cinnamon (CIN)       43.2     53.7     30.7
              Clove (CLO)          28.0     25.6     18.5
              Turmeric (TUR)       38.1     19.9      6.9
              Cumin (CUM)          55.2     24.1     12.1
              SEM                   3.76     5.06     3.41
              p<                    0.001    0.001    0.003

SEM = Standard error mean within groups.

Table 2. Mean (mg/g DM) total phenolics (TP), tannins (CT),
saponins (SP), soluble sugars (SS), starch and oligosaccharides (SO)
and non cellulose carbohydrates (NCC) of different forages and spices

                             TP        CT       SP
Feed groups   Feed types     GE        CE       DE

Forages       RS             4.6      9.2      3.3
              WS             3.3      4.5      4.3
              HAY            6.3      8.0      8.3
              SEM            0.561    0.888    0.982
              p<             0.002    0.001    0.001
Spices        CIN           73       53       62
              CLO          168       27       47
              TUR           22       39       38
              CUM           18       10       44
              SEM           22.6      4.39    18.09
              p<             0.001    0.03     0.3

Feed groups   Feed types     SS        SO      NCC

Forages       RS            34.7     455      489.7
              WS            18.7     164      182.7
              HAY          161.5     352      513.5
              SEM            2.87      5.53     6.90
              p<             0.002     0.02     0.02
Spices        CIN           25.5     169      194.5
              CLO           53.0     103      156.0
              TUR           67.9     542      609.9
              CUM           65.4      80      145.4
              SEM            6.33     70.6     73.1
              p<             0.001     0.001    0.001

GE = Gallic acid equivalent; CE = Catechin equivalent;
DE = Diosgenin equivalent.

Table 3. Mean mineral components (mg/kg DM) of different forages
and spices

Feed groups   Feed types      Ca           K           Mg

Forages          RS        2,588       13,308       2,071
                 WS        1,602        2,332         368
                 Hay       3,354        9,279         993
                 SEM         254        1,603         249
                 p<            0.001        0.001       0.001
Spices           CIN       9,630        3,758         735
                 CLO       9,999       16,403       2,794
                 TUR       1,539       24,126       2,418
                 CUM       8,303       14,180       2,700
                 SEM         688        1,463         168
                 p<            0.001        0.001       0.001

Feed groups   Feed types      Na           P        Cu      Co

Forages           RS       3,057         861       1.81    1.023
                  WS         230         225       0.94    0.516
                 Hay       1,215       1,313       7.33    1.167
                 SEM         414         158       1.00    0.102
                  p<           0.001       0.001   0.001   0.001
Spices           CIN         360         442       2.93    2.111
                 CLO       2,700       1,135       4.08    1.967
                 TUR         788       2,309       8.24    0.684
                 CUM       2,296       3,969       5.50    1.778
                 SEM         198         269       0.40    0.120
                  p<           0.001       0.001   0.001   0.001

Feed groups   Feed types     Mn       Se      Zn

Forages          RS        142.8     4.46   24.5
                 WS         14.3     3.22   11.4
                 Hay        69.9     4.72   29.2
                 SEM        18.6     0.96    2.7
                 p<          0.001   0.84    0.001
Spices           CIN       196       3.56   18.2
                 CLO       612       6.65   17.7
                 TUR        22       1.94   11.1
                 CUM        50       9.20   50.4
                 SEM        47       0.81    3.1
                 p<          0.001   0.5     0.001

Table 4. IVD (g/kg) for different forages with different levels
(mg/g) of spices at 3 incubation hours (means with SEM and
significance for main effects and interactions)

                                  20 h

Spices   Forages            Level of spices

                          0    10    30    90

CIN      RS              215   220   193   145
         WS              229   166   159   138
         Hay             290   329   235   135
CLO      RS              215   244   213   245
         WS              229   203   207   196
         Hay             290   311   270   287
CUM      RS              215   254   276   265
         WS              229   178   192   199
         Hay             290   291   326   317
TUR      RS              215   286   257   210
         WS              229   190   181   219
         Hay             290   351   293   341

SEM and significance           SEM = 6.28
  for main effects             F; p<0.001
  and interactions             S; p<0.001
                               L; p<0.003
                               FxS; p<0.4
                               FxL; p<0.005
                               SxL; p<0.001
                               FxSxL; p<0.3

                                  40 h

Spices   Forages            Level of spices

                          0    10    30    90

CIN      RS              239   330   305   246
         WS              241   293   256   283
         Hay             320   424   449   328
CLO      RS              239   287   280   249
         WS              241   269   237   271
         Hay             320   439   413   332
CUM      RS              239   307   266   270
         WS              241   253   261   303
         Hay             320   360   457   460
TUR      RS              239   291   263   238
         WS              241   220   223   216
         Hay             320   322   246   292

SEM and significance           SEM = 6.85
  for main effects             F; p<0.001
  and interactions             S; p<0.001
                               L; p<0.001
                               FxS; p<0.001
                               FxL; p<0.001
                               SxL; p<0.001
                               FxSxL; p<0.001

                                  60 h

Spices   Forages            Level of spices

                          0    10    30    90

CIN      RS              462   467   415   364
         WS              422   317   298   289
         Hay             562   439   524   396
CLO      RS              462   404   440   439
         WS              422   395   413   391
         Hay             562   523   568   560
CUM      RS              462   444   462   463
         WS              422   415   410   415
         Hay             562   550   546   513
TUR      RS              462   482   441   480
         WS              422   446   412   391
         Hay             562   581   520   585

SEM and significance           SEM = 7.53
  for main effects             F; p<0.001
  and interactions             S; p<0.001
                               L; p<0.001
                               FxS; p<0.001
                               FxL; p<0.06
                               SxL; p<0.001
                               FxSxL; p<0.001

F = Forage; S = Spices; L = Level of spices.

Table 5. IVOMD (g/kg) for different forages with different spices
at different levels (mg/g) and for 3 incubation hours

                                  20 h

Spices   Forages            Level of spices

                          0    10    30    90

CIN      RS              157   150   119    79
         WS              161   100   101   113
         Hay             217   218   182   109
CLO      RS              157   172   137   181
         WS              161   136   156   169
         Hay             217   246   209   222
CUM      RS              157   206   211   175
         WS              161   115   184   139
         Hay             217   272   253   251
TUR      RS              157   208   190   145
         WS              161   125   132   176
         Hay             217   290   274   262

SEM and significance           SEM = 5.60
  for main effects             F; p<0.001
  and interactions             S; p<0.001
                               L; p<0.3
                               FxS; p<0.3
                               FxL; p<0.002
                               SxL; p<0.006
                               FxSxL; p<0.8

                                  40 h

Spices   Forages            Level of spices

                          0    10    30    90

CIN      RS              181   303   272   232
         WS              207   271   231   246
         Hay             303   378   447   324
CLO      RS              181   258   236   178
         WS              207   255   191   248
         Hay             303   441   410   331
CUM      RS              181   303   245   245
         WS              207   213   230   285
         Hay             303   355   424   412
TUR      RS              181   262   233   182
         WS              207   192   205   190
         Hay             303   278   238   259

SEM and significance           SEM = 7.86
  for main effects             F; p<0.001
  and interactions             S; p<0.001
                               L; p<0.001
                               FxS; p<0.001
                               FxL; p<0.001
                               SxL; p<0.001
                               FxSxL; p<0.004

                                  60 h

Spices   Forages            Level of spices

                          0    10    30    90

CIN      RS              404   412   366   284
         WS              382   275   257   273
         Hay             522   421   491   353
CLO      RS              404   333   377   385
         WS              382   355   371   343
         Hay             522   475   499   518
CUM      RS              404   394   414   410
         WS              382   381   367   393
         Hay             522   490   482   477
TUR      RS              404   465   395   428
         WS              382   403   397   368
         Hay             522   531   427   514

SEM and significance           SEM = 6.80
  for main effects             F; p<0.001
  and interactions             S; p<0.001
                               L; p<0.001
                               FxS; p<0.002
                               FxL; p<0.2
                               SxL; p<0.001
                               FxSxL; p<0.001
COPYRIGHT 2010 Asian - Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2010 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion




Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Khan, Mohammad Mehedi Hasan; Chaudhry, Abdul Shakoor
Publication:Asian - Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:9BANG
Date:Jul 1, 2010
Previous Article:Effects of addition of electrolyte and ascorbic acid in feed during heat stress in buffaloes.
Next Article:Improvement of fermentation quality of rice straw silage by application of a bacterial inoculant and glucose.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters