Chemical analysis of World Trade Center fine particulate matter for use in toxicologic assessment. (World Trade Center: mini-monograph).

The catastrophic destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) on 11 September 2001 caused the release of high levels of airborne pollutants into the local environment. To assess the toxicity of fine particulate matter [particulate matter with a mass median aerodynamic diameter < 2.5 [micro]m (P[M.sub.2.5])], which may adversely affect the health of workers and residents in the area, we collected fallen dust samples on 12 and 13 September 2001 from sites within a half-mile of Ground Zero. Samples of WTC dust were sieved, aerosolized, and size-separated, and the P[M.sub.2.5] fraction was isolated on filters. Here we report the chemical and physical properties of P[M.sub.2.5] derived from these samples and compare them with P[M.sub.2.5] fractions of three reference materials that range in toxicity from relatively inert to acutely toxic (Mt. St. Helens PM; Washington, DC, ambient air PM; and residual oil fly ash). X-ray diffraction of very coarse sieved WTC PM (< 53 [micro]m) identified calcium sulfate (gypsum) and calcium carbonate (calcite) as major components. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed that calcium-sulfur and calcium-carbon particles were also present in the WTC P[M.sub.2.5] fraction. Analysis of WTC P[M.sub.2.5] using X-ray fluorescence, neutron activation analysis, and inductively coupled plasma spectrometry showed high levels of calcium (range, 22-33%) and sulfur (37-43% as sulfate) and much lower levels of transition metals and other elements. Aqueous extracts of WTC P[M.sub.2.5] were basic (pH range, 8.9-10.0) and had no evidence of significant bacterial contamination. Levels of carbon were relatively low, suggesting that combustion-derived particles did not form a significant fraction of these samples recovered in the immediate aftermath of the destruction of the towers. Because gypsum and calcite are known to cause irritation of the mucus membranes of the eyes and respiratory tract, inhalation of high doses of WTC P[M.sub.2.5] could potentially cause toxic respiratory effects. Key words: carbon analysis, ICP-AES, ICP-MS, inhalation toxicology, neutron activation analysis, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, X-ray fluorescence. Environ Health Perspect 111:972-980 (2003). doi: 10.1289/ehp.5930 available via http://dx.doi.org/[Online 20 November 2002]

**********

The attack on the World Trade Center (WTC) in New York City on 11 September 2001, in addition to causing the immediate and tragic loss of thousands of lives, resulted in the release of significant quantities of pollutants into the environment of the surrounding neighborhoods, including particulate matter (PM), asbestos, metals, and organic compounds [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) 2002b]. Dust infiltrated indoors into homes and apartments, in many cases up to several inches in depth. Fires at the WTC site continued for several months before finally being extinguished, and recovery and reconstruction efforts contributed to emissions of fine [particulate matter with a mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) < 2.5 [micro]m; P[M.sub.2.5]], coarse (> 2.5 and < 10 [micro]m; P[M.sub.2.5-10]), and larger (> 10 [micro]m) PM fractions. As people have returned to their residences and businesses, potential exposure issues are associated with redispersal of residual dust.

Recent studies have assessed the chemical and physical properties of bulk samples of WTC PM. The dust particles from the WTC site appear to be quite alkaline in nature, probably because of partial dissolution of concrete, gypsum, and glass fiber particles [U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 2002]. Lioy and co-workers (2002) found that bulk settled--dust samples of WTC PM were composed of particles of cement, carbon, cellulose, and several fiber types including mineral wool, fiberglass, cellulose, and asbestos. These authors also found significant concentrations of phthalate esters, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and other hydrocarbons (Offenberg et al. 2003). However, a detailed analysis of the P[M.sub.2.5] fraction of WTC dust has not been previously reported.

Exposure to ambient air PM has been associated with both acute and chronic adverse health effects, especially in sensitive populations (Dockery et al. 1993). Both fine and coarse particles are readily inhaled into the human respiratory tract. Reviews of current literature suggest that fine particles are more strongly implicated in cardiovascular effects than coarse particles, while both impact respiratory end points (U.S. EPA 2002c). Fine particles are typically formed from gases or from combustion processes, whereas coarse particles are produced by mechanical breakdown of crustal material. However, the P[M.sub.2.5] size range may also include a significant fraction of coarse particles that are broken down into smaller particles by strong mechanical forces (U.S. EPA 2002d). The unique situation of the WTC disaster may have generated a significant amount of crustal (building) material-derived particles in the P[M.sub.2.5] size range. Although P[M.sub.2.5-10] may have adverse health effects, quantities of WTC PM samples in this size range were limited (see "Size fractionation of bulk samples" in "Materials and Methods"). In addition, P[M.sub.2.5] is very relevant toxicologically, as it is associated with epidemiologic findings of adverse health effects in humans (Dockery et al. 1993). Consequently, our objective in this article was to describe the collection, size fractionation, and chemical analysis of samples of WTC P[M.sub.2.5] for use in toxicologic studies. To determine whether respirable WTC P[M.sub.2.5] is more or less toxic than typical ambient air P[M.sub.2.5], we compared the toxicity of WTC P[M.sub.2.5] with well-characterized reference P[M.sub.2.5] samples in a companion article (Gavett et al. 2003).

In this study we collected samples of settled dust from several sites in the immediate vicinity (< 0.5 miles) of Ground Zero on 12 and 13 September 2001. Samples were separated into fine, coarse, and larger fractions that could be studied for toxicologic effects. We thoroughly characterized the WTC P[M.sub.2.5] samples using a number of chemical and physical techniques to compare the composition of these samples with other well-studied P[M.sub.2.5] reference samples. Solid samples of WTC and reference P[M.sub.2.5] were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), carbon fraction analysis, and neutron activation analysis (NAA). Analyses were also carried out on water-extracted or 1 M hydrochloric acid-extracted suspensions of WTC and reference P[M.sub.2.5], including pH, endotoxin, and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES). The analytical results will contribute to the understanding of the composition and possible mechanisms of toxicity of P[M.sub.2.5] derived from the destruction of the WTC.

Detailed experimental findings of these studies are available in a U.S. EPA report (2002a).

Materials and Methods

Collection of World Trade Center PM samples. Using a paper scoop, we sampled several outdoor locations as well as one indoor location, all of which appeared undisturbed since the collapse of the towers, as judged by the presence of a smooth uniform layer of dust and the absence of indicators of recent human activity. All samples were collected within a half-mile of Ground Zero and labeled with numbers (1-13) on 12 September 2001, and letters (A-F) on 13 September 2001. After examination of the available inventory of samples, we selected seven locations (8, 11, 13, B, C, E, and F) to assess toxicity of samples from different geographical locations as well as overall toxicity of a pooled sample from these locations (Figure 1). The locations were selected to represent a distribution surrounding Ground Zero, with more collection sites in the east reflecting the direction of the predominant winds during the collapse of the WTC towers and surrounding buildings.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

Size fractionation of bulk samples. Bulk samples of the seven dust samples described above were sieved with a 53-[micro]m diameter mesh screen (USA Standard Testing Sieves; Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) on a shaker (Portable Sieve Shaker; Tyler Industrial Products, Mentor, OH). We processed the sieved material (P[M.sub.53]) in an apparatus designed to isolate different PM fractions (Figure 2). The P[M.sub.53] fraction was aerosolized through a 10-[micro]m aerodynamic diameter cut Wedding inlet (Anderson Instrument Co., Fultonville, NY) to remove particles in the 10-53 [micro]m range and isolate the P[M.sub.10] fraction. The P[M.sub.10] fraction was then passed through a 2.5-[micro]m cut cyclone (BGI, Inc., Waltham, MA) to remove the coarse fraction. The P[M.sub.2.5] fraction was collected on Teflon filters (Zefluor Supported PTFE, 2-[micro]m pore size, 47-mm diameter; Pall Gelman Sciences, Port Washington, NY). Ten to 40 filters were used in the size fractionation of each WTC sample. Roughly half the sample was in the P[M.sub.53]-sieved fraction. About 80-89% of the P[M.sub.53] fraction was in the 10- to 53-[micro]m size range, which is too large to use in respiratory toxicology studies, as deposition of particles > 5 [micro]m is minimal in small laboratory animals (Raabe et al. 1988). The amount of the 2.5- to 10-[micro]m fraction was very small (0.04-1.14% of the P[M.sub.53] fraction, except 3.23% in sample 13) and was therefore not feasible to study. The P[M.sub.2.5] fraction, however, was present in sufficient amounts (2.29-4.06% of P[M.sub.53] fraction) to study for potential respiratory health effects. The sum of the size fraction percentages does not total 100% of the original P[M.sub.53] fraction because of sample loss during fractionation. After overnight desiccation, filter weights were determined using an electrobalance (Model C-30; Thermo Cahn, Madison, WI). A total quantity of about 50 mg from each site, collected on 1-3 filters per site, was used in the study (Table 1). Mechanical scraping did not efficiently remove the P[M.sub.2.5] from the filters, so it was necessary to isolate the P[M.sub.2.5] using an aqueous extraction procedure.

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

Extraction of P[M.sub.2.5] from Teflon filters. Filters containing the P[M.sub.2.5] fraction were extracted using a modification of a method by Biran and co-workers (1996). Filters from each of the seven individual collection sites were extracted into distilled water (Gibco Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) in the ratio of 0.5 mL/mg sample (24.96-27.14 mL water). This volume of water was pipetted into a 100-mL sterile plastic cup containing a 3 mm-thick Teflon ring on the bottom designed to support the filter. Each filter was wetted with 200 [micro]L 70% ethanol on the particle side, placed on top of the ring with the particle side down, and a 6 mm-thick Teflon ring was placed on top of the filter. The cup with the filter was placed on ice and secured to an orbital shaker (Titer Plate Shaker; Lab-Line Instruments, Melrose Park, IL). Samples were shaken at a low speed and sonicated for 30 min at a power setting of 30 (Sonic 300 Dismembrator; Artek Systems Corp., Farmingdale, NY). Ten milliliters was pipetted from each of the seven samples into a single sterilized 150-mL Erlenmeyer flask on ice to make a pooled sample (WTCX). The pH of the pooled and individual site samples was determined immediately after extraction (Model 440; Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY). Sonicated filters were desiccated before reweighing to determine quantity extracted (i.e., removed) from the filters (Table 1). Pooled and individual site samples were frozen at -80[degrees]C and lyophilized for 2 days at -55[degrees]C and 140 mtorr (Virtis Company, Gardiner, NY). Lyophilized samples were stored at 4[degrees]C and subsequently brought to room temperature for chemical or physical analysis, or for use in toxicologic studies in mice (Gavett et al. 2002).

Sample used for inhalation exposure toxicity testing. Because we needed to conduct a nose-only inhalation exposure study to assess upper airway responses of test animals (Gavett et al. 2003), a sufficient quantity of sample was necessary for the exposure system (> 2 g). As there was not enough P[M.sub.2.5] or P[M.sub.2.5-10] sample available to conduct this study, we decided to use a P[M.sub.53] sample (sieved but not further fractionated) that was available in sufficient quantity to run through the inhalation exposure system. The inhalation exposure system uses a 2.5-[micro]m cut cyclone to remove larger particles (Ledbetter et al. 1998), and therefore measurement of the PM concentration in the exposure zone of the chamber represents exposure to P[M.sub.2.5]. A sample of P[M.sub.53] from location no. 3 (Figure 1; WTC3 in Table 1), 0.3 miles east of Ground Zero (in the predominant wind direction), was available in sufficient quantities for the nose-only inhalation exposure study.

Control PM samples. To assess the relative toxicity of WTC P[M.sub.2.5], pooled and individual site samples were compared with three other well-characterized control P[M.sub.2.5] samples. We chose samples representing an urban ambient PM with moderate toxicity, a crustal PM with low toxicity, and an emission source PM with high toxicity (Table 1). National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Standard Reference Material (SRM) 1649a is an urban ambient PM collected in the Washington, DC, area in 1976-1977 over a 12-month period and represents a time-integrated sample (NIST 2001). This material was selected for comparison of toxicity of WTC P[M.sub.2.5] with other typical urban air P[M.sub.2.5] (albeit from an earlier era when leaded gasoline was still in use). This material was collected as a total suspended particulate (TSP) sample with a large amount of coarse PM and larger nonrespirable PM. Consequently, SRM 1649a was size-fractionated and extracted using the procedures described above for comparison with the WTC P[M.sub.2.5] samples.

WTC P[M.sub.2.5] was also compared with a previously size-separated P[M.sub.2.5] fraction of ash from Mt. St. Helens (MSH) in Washington State (Graham et al. 1985). About half of MSH is crystalline in nature, primarily plagioclase, a series of compounds beginning with sodium aluminum silicate (NaAl[Si.sub.3][O.sub.8]) and ending with calcium aluminum silicate (Ca[Al.sub.2][Si.sub.2][O.sub.8]) that show continuous solid solution from albite to anorthite, with CaAl replacing NaSi as the series progresses. The remaining portion is amorphous (glass) and contains minor amounts of cristobalite (3%) and quartz (< 1%). The P[M.sub.2.5] fraction of MSH has low toxicity in rats and mice (Hatch et al. 1984).

Residual oil fly ash (ROFA) is a PM sample with a high content of bioavailable transition metals including vanadium (V), nickel (Ni), and iron (Fe). Numerous studies have demonstrated that these metals are associated with lung injury in both healthy animals and animal models of cardiopulmonary injury (Dreher et al. 1997; Gavett et al. 1999; Kodavanti et al. 1998). For this study, we chose a sample of ROFA (no. 3; Kodavanti et al. 1998) from a boiler system that is toxic, yet not as soluble in water as previous samples of ROFA, and is therefore more comparable to WTC PM samples, which are not extremely water soluble. ROFA sample no. 3 has an MMAD of 2.665 [micro]m, slightly larger than other P[M.sub.2.5] samples used in this study but still acceptable for toxicity testing.

Overview of analytical methods. Analytical chemistry of WTC, SRM 1649a, MSH, and ROFA P[M.sub.2.5] samples entailed measurements of both solid samples and their liquid extracts. Solid (including lyophilized) samples were characterized by SEM/energy dispersive X-ray analysis (SEM/EDX), XRD, NAA, XRF, and carbon fraction analysis of the organic, elemental, and carbonate fractions (OC/EC/CC). Deionized water extracts were characterized by pH, endotoxin, and ion chromatography (IC) analysis. Elemental and sulfate (S[O.sub.4]) content of deionized water and 1 M HCl extracts were measured using ICP-MS and ICP-AES. The two extraction liquids are used to estimate easily bioavailable and total bioavailable metal content, respectively. Although this speciation scheme is a rough approximation of bioavailability for P[M.sub.2.5] samples of complex multielemental composition, it has proven useful in characterizing inhalation toxicology end points for various source and ambient particulates (Costa and Dreher 1997; Kodavanti et al. 1998).

Sufficient quantities of MSH, ROFA, and pooled WTCX samples were available to perform all analyses. Quantities of the individual site WTC samples and SRM 1649a were very limited (Table 1), and analyses were prioritized to yield the greatest information possible. SEM/EDX testing required < 1 mg and was selected for all samples. NAA was chosen as the next most applicable analysis to provide total elemental composition data to support SEM/EDX. We performed OC/EC/CC, ICP-MS, ICP-AES, and IC analyses on remaining samples where possible. XRD and XRF analyses were performed only on the WTC3 sample.

SEM/EDX analysis. SEM/EDX provided physical and chemical characterization of particles and fibers found in the control samples and lyophilized WTC P[M.sub.2.5] samples, and on P[M.sub.2.5] on polycarbonate filters taken during the inhalation exposure study using the WTC3 sample. SEM/EDX was carried out using a Personal SEM (PSEM) (formerly R.J. Lee Instruments, Ltd., now Aspex Instruments, Trafford, PA) as previously described (U.S. EPA 2002e). For lyophilized WTC or control samples, a small amount was applied to an adhesive carbon tab affixed to an aluminum SEM stub. For filter samples, small pieces (< 1 [cm.sup.2]) were affixed to aluminum SEM stubs using a carbonaceous suspension. Because only 15-30 images were examined from each sample, the results should not be interpreted as quantitative or comprehensive (Mamane et al. 2001). Rather, these qualitative results were used primarily to determine consistency with other analytical techniques described below.

X-Ray diffraction analysis. XRD was used to qualitatively determine the presence of any crystalline compounds in the WTC3 sample used in the inhalation exposure study. The P[M.sub.53] sample was side-drifted into an aluminum holder and mounted into the Siemens D-500 diffractometer (Bruker Analytical X-Ray Systems, Madison, WI). The generator, set at 45 kilovolts and 40 milliamperes (mA), generated X-rays from a copper-target X-ray tube. The filament current was 3.46 mA. Intensities were collected by a lithium-drifted silicon detector fitted with a monochromator riding on a goniometer in the coupled [theta]/2[theta] mode, where [theta] = diffraction angle. Peaks were collected in the range 2[theta] = 5 to 85 degrees. Collection software used was Datascan (version 3.2; Materials Data, Inc., Livermore, CA). Evaluation software was MDI Jade 5 using the pattern library Powder Diffraction File (PDF), release 2000 (International Centre for Diffraction Data, Newtown Square, PA).

Neutron activation analysis. NAA was used to determine the total elemental content of lyophilized WTC and control P[M.sub.2.5] samples (NCSU 2002). Samples of these materials (3-7 mg) were packaged in precleaned polyethylene vials in a clean hood, and irradiated as follows. For aluminum (Al), chlorine (C1), copper (Cu), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), sodium (Na), titanium (Ti), and V content, samples were irradiated for 30 sec at [less than or equal to] 900 k[W.sub.th], decayed for 10-30 min, and counted for 5 min. For all other elements, samples were irradiated for 6 hr at [less than or equal to] 900 [kW.sub.th]. For arsenic (As), potassium (K), molybdenum (Mo), and antimony (Sb) content, samples were decayed for 1 week and counted for 15 min each. For Fe, Ni, barium (Ba), calcium (Ca), chromium (Cr), strontium (Sr), and zinc (Zn) content, samples were decayed for 2 weeks and counted for 30 min each. [gamma]-Ray spectra were counted and compared against calibration and quality control standards, and quantitative analyses were performed.

X-Ray fluorescence analysis. Five polycarbonate filters (Isopore 0.8 lam, 47-mm diameter, Millipore Corporation, Bedford, MA) loaded with the WTC3 P[M.sub.2.5] sample, with five lot-matched blank filters, were mounted in liquid-type polyethylene sample cups, placed in a stainless steel sample holder, and analyzed. X-ray intensities were collected with the Philips PW2404 XRF (Philips Analytical, Natick, MA) using the Philips proprietary software SuperQ. Net intensities (peak-background) were analyzed using the standardless software UniQuant 4 (Omega Data Systems, Veldhoven, the Netherlands) after subtraction of the intensities due to the blank filter system. The constituents of the dust were evaluated as oxides.

Carbon fraction analysis. Carbon speciation into OC/EC/CC fractions was performed on control and lyophilized WTC P[M.sub.2.5] samples and on quartz filters taken during the inhalation exposure to WTC3 P[M.sub.2.5]. The thermo-optical method, based upon sequential pyrolytic vaporization and detection of the three carbon fractions, was performed (Sunset Laboratory, Forest Grove, OR) as previously described (Birch and Cary 1996; Sunset 2002).

Endotoxin analysis. One-milliliter aliquots of filter extracts from each individual site sample were analyzed for endotoxin content using the limulus amebocyte lysate gel-clot method (Associates of Cape Cod, Inc., Falmouth, MA). Samples were titered using a 2-fold dilution scheme against control standard endotoxin [CSE; lot no. 85, Escherichia coli O113, 5 endotoxin units (EU)/ng]. Preliminary inhibition tests (positive product controls) were performed on the undiluted samples spiked with CSE equivalent to twice the sensitivity ([lambda]; 0.03 EU/mL). The error of the gel-clot method is [+ or -] one 2-fold dilution.

ICP-MS and ICP-AES. Control P[M.sub.2.5] samples, lyophilized WTC P[M.sub.2.5] samples, and polycarbonate filters taken during the inhalation exposure to WTC3 P[M.sub.2.5] were extracted with deionized water or 1 M HCl and analyzed for their elemental content. Samples (4-6 mg) were extracted with 1.6 mL of either liquid. Polycarbonate filters containing 2-3 mg WTC3 P[M.sub.2.5] were extracted with 13 mL of either liquid. High-speed centrifugation was used to separate the liquid and solids (17,000 x g for 1.6-mL samples; 51,000 x g for 13-mL samples). After dilution, extraction solutions were analyzed quantitatively using ICPMS (ELAN 6000; PerkinElmer Instruments, Shelton, CT) and ICP-AES (Model P40; PerkinElmer Instruments) as previously described (U.S. EPA 2002f, 2002g, respectively). Filter blanks levels for all elements were negligible compared with the levels in the PM samples.

Ion chromatography of deionized water extracts. Deionized water extracts from the ICP sample prep as described above were analyzed quantitatively for anion and cation content using IC (ManTech Environmental, Research Triangle Park, NC). A DX-500 ion chromatograph (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA) was used with an AS14 column (Dionex) for anion analysis in Suppressor-ASRS Ultra-AutoSuppressor Recycle mode, with 3.5 mM [Na.sub.2]C[O.sub.3]/1.0 mM NaHC[O.sub.3] eluent. A CS12 column (Dionex) was used for cation analysis in Suppressor-CSRS II Ultra-AutoSuppressor Recycle mode, with 20 mM methanesulfonic acid eluent.

Results

Analytical chemistry of solid samples. SEM/EDX analysis. Water-extracted and lyophilized WTC P[M.sub.2.5] samples were dominated by large snowflakelike crystals composed of Ca, sulfur (S), and oxygen (O) (Figure 3A). Aggregates of fine particles composed of various combinations of Ca, Mg, Al, S, O, and silicon (Si) were also prominent (Figure 3B). Fibers approximately 1 [micro]m in diameter were found in most of the samples and had a composition similar to the fine particle aggregates (Figure 3C). Metallic particles [mostly Ti and Fe, although Zn, lead (Pb), Ba, and Cu were also found] were found typically as inclusions in the large aggregates of fine particles (Figure 3D).

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

SEM/EDX analysis of the aerosolized P[M.sub.2.5] fraction of WTC3 (not water extracted) showed the same overall chemistry as the extracted and lyophilized WTC PM samples; the majority of particles were composed of Ca, carbon, and O with S (Figure 4A) [or without significant levels of S (Figure 4B)] and some also contained Si. In contrast to the crystals and aggregates of the lyophilized samples described above and shown in Figure 3, the WTC3 particles were small, typically about 1 lam, with rough, irregular features. The different physical form of the Ca-based particles in WTC3 reflects the dry size segregation of the inhalation exposure system. These results suggest that the large crystals and aggregates observed in the lyophilized samples were not originally present in the P[M.sub.2.5] Teflon filters but were formed during the aqueous extraction and lyophilization process.

[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]

Particles with other compositions were found with far less frequency. These included particles composed of Fe, carbon, and Sb-Zn (one example found). One or more possible asbestos fibers (Mg-Si composition) were also found; however, polarized light microscopy rather than SEM/EDX is the preferred method for identifying asbestos in bulk materials. SEM/EDX analysis performed on MSH, SRM 1649a P[M.sub.2.5], and ROFA showed results typically found in previous analyses of these materials (data not shown).

X-Ray diffraction analysis. XRD analysis of WTC3 P[M.sub.53] (before size segregation by the inhalation exposure system) showed a complex pattern containing 25 peaks, indicating the presence of several crystalline materials. The peak area above the background curve was 50.6%. The 49.4% below the curve indicated that WTC3 P[M.sub.53] consisted of about half amorphous materials. Four patterns were identified as being consistent with peaks identified in the dust. Figure 5 shows the XRD spectra of WTC3 P[M.sub.53] and those of the matched compounds. Two compounds were identified as major constituents [calcium sulfate dihydrate (gypsum) and calcium carbonate (calcite)], and two were identified as minor constituents [bassanite (calcium sulfate hemihydrate) and quartz (silicon dioxide); Table 2]. The predominance of Ca-based compounds by XRD supports the major findings of the SEM/EDX analysis of WTC P[M.sub.2.5]--the WTC PM materials are composed predominantly of Ca compounds, some of which are water soluble. The sample of MSH was also analyzed by XRD, and the results were consistent with those previously reported (Graham et al. 1985; data not shown).

[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]

Total elemental analysis by neutron activation analysis and X-ray fluorescence analysis. Both NAA and XRF analyses showed that there were large amounts (range 22-33%) of Ca in the WTC P[M.sub.2.5] samples (Table 3). XRF analysis showed 37.5% S as S[O.sub.4] in the WTC3 P[M.sub.2.5] sample. Together, Ca and S[O.sub.4] account for 64% of the WTC3 P[M.sub.2.5] sample, in good agreement with the SEM/EDX and XRD analyses. For all other elements, NAA and XRF results for the various WTC P[M.sub.2.5] samples show good agreement. This consistency in composition is remarkable, considering the wide area over which the original WTC dust samples were collected (Figure 1). Besides Ca and S[O.sub.4], only Si, Al, Mg, and Fe are present in levels approaching or greater than 1% of total mass. The relative weight-percent ratios of Al, Mg, and Fe are in the range of those found in portland cement, a major component of concrete (McKetta 1978). Of the transition and heavy metals and other toxic elements such as Sb and As, only Zn and Ti are present in levels approaching 0.5% of total mass, whereas all others are present at maximum levels of hundreds of micrograms per gram (parts per million). Within the group of seven WTC P[M.sub.2.5] samples analyzed using NAA, WTCE has the highest content of total metals and toxic elements (e.g., Sb and As); combined levels of these elements were about twice those of the other WTC samples. Comparison of the total metal and toxic elemental content of the WTC P[M.sub.2.5] samples with the control dusts shows the overall metal levels as MSH < WTC < SRM 1649a < ROFA.

Carbon fraction analysis. The WTC P[M.sub.2.5] samples had low total carbon content, in the range of 1.5-8.5% (Table 4), in contrast with control samples such as SRM 1649a (26%) and ROFA (16%). MSH had almost no carbon, as expected from this crustal PM sample. The WTC3 P[M.sub.2.5] sample used in the inhalation study had about 4 times as much carbon as the other two WTC P[M.sub.2.5] samples. This result may be due to differences in the method by which the samples were isolated (physical separation vs. aqueous extraction and lyophilization) or may simply be due to variability in carbon content of samples from different locations. Despite the variation in total carbon content of WTC PM samples, the ratios of the carbon fractions were similar. Carbonate carbon is most likely associated with Ca (as calcite, Table 2) and other alkaline earth metals (e.g., Mg). The level of carbonate carbon is relatively small compared with the overall alkaline earth content, yet levels are high enough to make Ca and/or other alkali earth carbonates the likely source(s) of the high pH values measured (see below). Elemental carbon levels (an indicator of carbon black produced by incomplete combustion during the fires prior to collapse) were low, indicating that the fine fraction of WTC P[M.sub.2.5] was dominated by the presence of pulverized building materials rather than the products of incomplete combustion. Organic carbon levels are relatively high and can be attributed to many sources in the WTC building and to jet fuel (Lioy et al. 2002).

Analytical chemistry of aqueous extracts of samples, pH and endotoxin levels, pH levels of water-extracted WTC P[M.sub.2.5] and control samples are shown in Table 5. The pH of water-extracted WTC P[M.sub.2.5] samples before lyophilization ranged from 8.88 in WTCE to 10.00 in WTC8. The alkaline pH results from the building materials comprising much of the dust, most likely the alkaline earth (Ca, Mg) compounds. Calcium carbonate, identified by XRD, is a major component of cement (McKetta 1978) and other building materials. It is almost insoluble in water (14 [micro]g/mL), yet a saturated solution produces a pH of 9.4 (Weast 1985). For a 2 mg PM/mL ratio, this requires < 7 [micro]g soluble calcium carbonate/mg PM. Such a level is easily attainable in the WTC samples, given the percent ranges of Ca and carbonate carbon measured by elemental and OC/EC/CC analysis. The pH of lyophilized WTC P[M.sub.2.5] reconstituted in unbuffered saline was very close to neutral (pH 7.36), whereas MSH was only slightly acidic (pH 6.61) and ROFA was moderately acidic (pH 3.74). It is not known why the pH of WTC P[M.sub.2.5] should be close to neutral after reconstitution in saline.

Endotoxin levels in WTC P[M.sub.2.5] samples were minimal compared with other urban PM samples such as SRM 1649a, which was also low (Table 5). Several thousand times this level of endotoxin caused an acute neutrophilic response in the lungs of CD-1 mice (Dhingra et al. 2001). The level of endotoxin in the samples used in this study would not be anticipated to contribute directly to any inflammatory response in the lungs.

Extractable elemental/ion analysis by ICP-MS, ICP-AES, and IC. Elemental and ion compositions were consistent within each sample group tested (Table 6). The ICP-AES data for S were treated as S[O.sub.4], as both XRD and XRF showed S was present in this oxidized form. The S[O.sub.4] content of the WTC P[M.sub.2.5] samples ranged from 38 to 44% of total weight, and the WTC3 ICP-AES and XRF results (Table 3) were nearly identical. The ICP-AES data showed that water-soluble Ca accounted for 18-19% of WTC P[M.sub.2.5] samples, which was about 8-15% lower than results from XRF and NAA analyses (Table 3). This may reflect an incomplete extraction in the 1-hr time frame, the relatively mild solutions and conditions used in the extraction method, or the presence of other insoluble forms of Ca in the WTC P[M.sub.2.5] samples. ICP data for the 1 M HCl-soluble extracts of WTC P[M.sub.2.5] showed an additional 1-2 weight percent Ca content relative to the water-soluble extracts. The increase may be attributed to calcite or other water-insoluble Ca salts that are soluble in 1 M HCl.

The same ordering of water-soluble element < 1 M HCl-soluble element < total element content held for all other analytes. Total content measured by NAA/XRF and acidsoluble content measured by ICP agreed within 25% for elements such as Mg and Zn, which exist in compounds more amenable to acid dissolution (Budavari 1996; Weast 1985). Elements such as Al, Fe, and Ti, which are in the form of complex oxides usually in combination with Si, are much less soluble under the acid extraction conditions used in this study and do not agree as well (Budavari 1996; Weast 1985). Water-extractive contents were < 10% of the total content values for nearly all transition and heavy metals. Acid-extractive contents were almost all < 50% of the total content values.

Comparison of the water-soluble transition and heavy metal levels of the WTC samples with the control dusts used in this study shows the overall metal content trend as MSH < WTC < SRM 1649a < ROFA. ROFA has high levels of water-soluble transition metals, including V, Ni, and Fe, which are important in its toxicity (Kodavanti et al. 1998). The 1 M HCl-soluble metal content trend is MSH < WTC < ROFA (not enough SRM 1649a P[M.sub.2.5] sample was available to run this test). Extractable elemental content of the WTC samples more closely resembled the crustal MSH sample than the urban ambient SRM 1649a P[M.sub.2.5] sample.

Discussion

We collected samples of fallen dust at various locations in the immediate vicinity of the WTC site 1 and 2 days after the WTC disaster and analyzed the P[M.sub.2.5] fraction, using several physical and chemical techniques. The XRD analysis showed that the sieved WTC P[M.sub.53] sample consists primarily of Ca-based compounds, specifically calcium sulfate (gypsum) and calcium carbonate (calcite; the main component of limestone). The NAA, XRF, and ICP analyses strongly suggest that these compounds are present in the P[M.sub.2.5] fraction as well. Ca and S[O.sub.4] compose about two-thirds of WTC P[M.sub.2.5] on a weight percent basis. Taken together, the total elemental analysis data account for 79% of the weight of the WTC3 P[M.sub.2.5] sample and indicate that the main components are construction materials such as cement, concrete aggregate, ceiling tiles, and wallboard. The remaining mass fraction is most likely due to moisture content and to O, hydrogen, and nitrogen associated with both the organic and inorganic constituents.

The content of transition and heavy metals and other toxic trace elements in WTC P[M.sub.2.5] samples is low compared with that of combustion-derived ROFA, as expected from crustal-derived building materials. Levels of elements that could be attributed to metal wiring (Cu), plumbing (Fe, Cu, Pb), structural steel (Fe, Mn), and communication and computer equipment (Cu, Fe, Zn, others) are also low. This may be attributed to the relatively small proportion of metal-containing building contents compared with the building itself, or perhaps these materials resisted crumbling and pulverization into the P[M.sub.2.5] fraction. Elemental analysis of water and acid extracts of WTC P[M.sub.2.5] provides speciation information on chemical constituents that are potentially bioavailable after inhalation, or which can be easily released into the environment from rain and washing of streets and buildings. The extractable amounts of metals and toxic elements are low compared with those of the ROFA and ambient air SRM 1649a samples, partly because of the small total amounts present in the original material, and partly because of the limited solubility of most of these elements at the alkaline pH levels (8.9-10.0) of the water extracts (Hoffland 2002; Neubauer et al. 2000).

The results of this study differ in some respects from those of the USGS (2002) and Lioy and co-workers (2002), who performed chemical and physical analyses of whole (not size-separated) WTC PM samples collected within a 3-km radius of the WTC site. The USGS (2002) collected several dust samples on 17 and 18 September that had only limited protection from the rain that fell on 14 September and possibly changed sample composition. The USGS study found Ca in the whole dust approximately in the same proportion (average 18%) that we found in the P[M.sub.2.5] fraction, but S averaged 3% (or 9% as S[O.sub.4]), a level about 4-fold lower than reported here, suggesting that S[O.sub.4] may have been washed away by rain more easily than other species. The USGS also found a notably higher level of Si (average 15% vs. 3% here), probably reflective of a large amount of glass fiber present in very coarse fractions (Lioy et al. 2002; USGS 2002), which do not fragment into P[M.sub.2.5] as easily as gypsum and other building materials. Lioy and co-workers (2002) collected three samples on 16 and 17 September from sheltered locations and found that Ca and S[O.sub.4] in the settled dust were present in the same ratio as in our study. However, the combined levels comprised about 6% of the whole dust, a level about 10-fold lower than that found in the P[M.sub.2.5] fraction in our study.

We conclude that water-soluble Ca-containing compounds were enriched in the WTC P[M.sub.2.5] fraction compared with those in the whole settled dust. Additionally, the WTC P[M.sub.2.5] samples were remarkably homogeneous in their overall elemental content, considering the wide geographic range of sample collection. These results were unexpected, given the complexity of the building material composition and scale of the disaster. However, they are reasonable, considering the prevalent use of gypsum in building materials such as ceiling tiles, wallboard, and cement, and the ease with which these materials can be crumbled into a fine powder, mix, and homogenize.

The likely major acute inhalation hazards of WTC P[M.sub.2.5] based on the results from this study are due to the presence of gypsum, calcite, and cement or concrete dust components. Both gypsum and calcite irritate the mucus membranes of the eyes, nose, throat, and upper airways (Stellman 1998). Calcium carbonate dust causes coughing, sneezing, and nasal irritation (NLM 2002). These symptoms of inhalation exposure are similar to those reported by rescue and cleanup workers in the immediate aftermath of the WTC attack (Kelley 2001). The high content of gypsum and calcite in the WTC P[M.sub.2.5] fraction suggests that potentially toxic effects may also extend into the smaller airways and lung parenchyma.

The physical and chemical characterization of the samples described here contributes to the understanding of biologic responses in the companion article (Gavett et al. 2003), which describes short-term acute respiratory tract toxicology of the WTC P[M.sub.2.5] and control P[M.sub.2.5] samples. Further detailed analyses and toxicity testing of the WTC P[M.sub.2.5] fraction may be necessary to evaluate other components found in the bulk WTC fallout dust, which may be enriched in the smaller inhalable particle sizes, and which have known long-term health consequences. Identified WTC bulk PM components that are known inhalation hazards are asbestos, crystalline silica, and toxic organics such as PAHs, polychlorinated biphenyls, and dioxins (Lioy et al. 2002; Offenberg et al. 2003; USGS 2002). Calcite and gypsum are often contaminated with small amounts of silica, which is the main concern for long-term occupational health hazards (Stellman 1998). Minor amounts of silica were detected in the WTC PM samples (Table 2). The results of this study are also of special interest because of resuspension of the dust during cleanup operations of both the Ground Zero site and building interior surfaces throughout lower Manhattan (Johnson 2002). WTC PM that infiltrated into buildings is most likely of smaller particle sizes and more of an inhalation hazard than that found outdoors.

Table 1. Description of samples used in study.

Sample      Collection
code           date       Location, description

WTC site samples
 WTC8      12 Sept. 2001  Beekman St.: filters #9, #14
                          0.4 miles E of Ground Zero

 WTC11     12 Sept. 2001  55 Church St.: filters #13, #14, #15
                          In front of Millennium Hilton Hotel
                          0.1 miles E of Ground Zero

 WTC13     12 Sept. 2001  Church and Liberty Sts.: filters #4, #5
                          0.1 miles SE of Ground Zero

 WTCB      13 Sept. 2001  Trinity Pl. and Rector St.: filter #4
                          From a car hood and windshield
                          0.25 miles S of Ground Zero

 WTCC      13 Sept. 2001  Winter Garden Park: filters #4, #7
                          From a park bench facing the Hudson River
                          0.2 miles WNW of Ground Zero

 WTCE      13 Sept. 2001  Murray and Greenwich Sts.: filters #5, #6
                          From a window ledge
                          0.25 miles NNE of Ground Zero

 WTCF      13 Sept. 2001  Inside 120 Broadway: filters #2, #12
                          From a marble staircase with no footprints
                          0.25 miles SE of Ground Zero

 WTC3      12 Sept. 2001  23 Park Row: ground sample in front of
                          J&R Electronics (across City Hall Park)
                          0.3 miles E of Ground Zero

Control PM samples
 SRM         1976-1977    SRM 1649a
  1649a                   (urban dust collected in Washington, DC)

 MSH           1980       Mt. St. Helens ash, Washington State, from
                          Graham et al. (1985)

 ROFA          1994       Residual oil fly ash, ROFA sample 3 from
                          Kodavanti et al. (1998)

                                                Extracted
Sample           Size        Total weight      weight (rog)
code           fraction       on filters       % Extracted

WTC site samples
 WTC8        P[M.sub.2.5]      53.316 mg          46.70
                                                  87.6

 WTC11       P[M.sub.2.5]      50.097 mg          29.79
                                                  59.5
 WTC13       P[M.sub.2.5]      51.006 mg          46.29
                                                  90.8

 WTCB        P[M.sub.2.5]      52.969 mg          42.31
                                                  79.9

 WTCC        P[M.sub.2.5]      54.285 mg          47.67
                                                  87.8

 WTCE        P[M.sub.2.5]      49.919 mg          45.13
                                                  90.4

 WTCF        P[M.sub.2.5]      53.600 mg          38.73
                                                  72.3

 WTC3        P[M.sub.<53]      21.521 g       Not extracted;
                                sieved        size-separated
                               material      during exposure
Control PM samples
 SRM         P[M.sub.2.5]    47.984 mg (a)        39.33
  1649a                                           82.0

 MSH         P[M.sub.2.5]     > 10 g (a)     Previously size-
                                                separated

 ROFA           MMAD:          > 2 g (a)       Milled; not
            2.665 [micro]m                      extracted

Abbreviations: E, east; NNE, north-northeast; S, south; SE,
southeast; WNW, west-northwest.

(a) Weight available.

Table 2. XRD analysis of compounds present in
WTC3 sample. (a)

                                                       Relative
ICDD no.      Formula                      Mineral      amount

05-0586       CaC[0.sub.3]                 Calcite      Major
33-0311       CaS[O.sub.4]*2[H.sub.2]0     Gypsum       Major
41-0224       CaS[O.sub.4]*0.5[H.sub.2]0   Bassanite    Minor
46-1045       Si[O.sub.2]                  Quartz       Minor

ICDD, International Centre for Diffraction Data.

(a) Sample was sieved (P[M.sub.53]) but not further size-separated.
Analysis showed about half crystalline materials (50.6%
above background), and the remainder was amorphous.
After smoothing and subtracting background, evaluation
software (Jade 5; Materials Data, Inc.) was used to match
patterns with library available from the Data Diffraction
File (release 2000; International Centre for Diffraction
Data). Relative amounts: major is > 20 weight %; minor is
> weight % but < 20 weight %.

Table 3. Analysis of WTC and control P[M.sub.2.5] samples by XRF
or NAA (micrograms analyte per gram solid sample). (a)

Sample:                   WTC8       WTC11     WTCB      WTCC
Method:                    NAA        NAA       NAA       NAA

Analyte
S[O.sup.-2.sub.4]
Ca                        242,000   226,000   333,000   257,000
Si
Al                         15,400    13,500     7,560    10,600
Mg                          7,040     5,340     2,870     4,540
Fe                          8,360     7,360     3,630     4,480
Cl                          1,940     3,580     1,460     1,570
K
Zn                          2,310     1,960     1,380     1,280
Ti                          2,630     5,730     1,230     1,820
P[O.sup.-3.sub.4]
Na                          2,030     1,700       760     1,250
Mn                            358       295       136       257
Cu                                      428
Ba
Sb                            102      63.0      64.2      59.3
Mo                           48.7      35.7      29.3      19.9
Ni
Cr                            178       196      62.3      78.9
As                            3.5       3.6       2.2       2.9
V                            65.7       280      29.5      72.0
Sr                                      826
Total [micro]g/g          282,466   267,297   352,213   283,030
% Total mass                 28.3      26.7      35.2      28.3

Sample:                   WTCE       WTCF      WTCXb     WTC3c
Method:                    NAA        NAA       NAA      XFIF

Analyte
S[O.sup.-2.sub.4]                                       375,300
Ca                        205,000   243,000   287,000   265,600
Si                                                       30,000
Al                         23,900    16,000     5,810     9,930
Mg                          9,070     5,150     2,900     6,550
Fe                         15,100     6,930     2,730     6,290
Cl                          1,710     2,100     3,310     3,330
K                           4,660               2,890     2,690
Zn                          5,860     2,020       813     1,760
Ti                          4,920     2,640     1,130     1,450
P[O.sup.-3.sub.4]                                           779
Na                          1,520     2,070     1,250       725
Mn                            302       340       107
Cu                            560       484
Ba                           84.7     344.0      97.0
Sb                            308      81.8      49.3
Mo                            125      36.5      23.8
Ni
Cr                            225       131      56.4
As                            6.1       4.0       2.2
V                             158       103      38.3
Sr                          1,100       506       557
Total [micro]g/g          274,609   281,940   308,764   704,404
% Total mass                 27.5      28.2      30.9      70.4

Sample:                 SRM 1649a     MSH      ROFA
Method:                    NAA        NAA       NAA

Analyte
S[O.sup.-2.sub.4]
Ca                                   29,800
Si
Al                         37,600    97,200    27,700
Mg                                    6,900
Fe                         30,500    29,200    30,900
Cl                          2,790     1,680     1,030
K                          15,300     8,880
Zn                          1,330        56     9,760
Ti                          3,550     3,060
P[O.sup.-3.sub.4]
Na                          4,420    38,500    32,400
Mn                            268       770     1,000
Cu                            306
Ba                            958     371.0       762
Sb                           73.1                 681
Mo                                                355
Ni                            252              20,500
Cr                            302      17.9       582
As                            102                82.7
V                             583      75.3    45,400
Sr                            422       646
Total [micro]g/g           98,756   217,157   171,153
% Total mass                  9.9      21.7      17.1

(a) WTC PM2.5 samples were extracted and lyophilized. Analytes are
arranged in order of decreasing content in WTC3 sample (including
liquid extract samples; Table 6) by whatever analysis provided highest
content. S and P measured by XRF were oxidized and assumed to be
S[O.sup.-2.sub.4] and P[O.sup.-3.sub.4], respectively. Sample WTC13
was not analyzed because of insufficient sample quantity. Missing
values were either not determined or below detection limit.

(b) WTCX = pooled sample of WTC8, WTC11, WTC13, WTCB, WTCC, WTCE,
and WTCF.

(c) WTC3 was size-separated to P[M.sub.2.5] using nose-only
inhalation exposure system; average values are shown (n = 5).

Table 4. Carbon fraction analysis of P[M.sub.2.5] samples. (a)

                                         Sample

Carbon fraction    WTC3  WTCX (pooled)  WTCB  MSH   ROFA   SRM 1649a

OC                 6.88      0.93       2.11  0.06  1.31     10.82
FO                 0.31      0.00       0.01  0.07  13.63    15.10
CC                 1.39      0.60       0.35  0.00  1.32     0.00
Total              8.58      1.53       2.47  0.13  16.26    25.92

(a) Carbon fractions were analyzed as described in text. Results are
expressed as percent of total mass of sample.

Table 5. pH and endotoxin levels of P[M.sub.2.5] samples.

                                       Endotoxin (b)
Sample                    pH in                            pH in
code                    water (a)   EU/mL   Inhibition   saline (c)

Extraction water          5.28
WTC8                     10.00       0.50      None
WTC11                     9.16       0.25      None
WTC13                     9.47       0.50      None
WTCB                      9.54       0.25      None
WTCC                      9.32       0.50      None
WTCE                      8.88       0.25      None
WTCF                      9.55       0.50      None
SRM 1649a                 4.20      25         None

Sterile saline                                              6.67
WTCX                      9.35                              7.36
MSH                                                         6.61
ROFA                                                        3.74

(a) pH and endotoxin levels of SRM 1649a and all WTC samples
after water extraction from filters in the ratio of 0.5
mL/mg P[M.sub.2.5].

(b) Endotoxin levels measured as EU/mL water extract. Samples
were tested for inhibition of the endotoxin assay (none was
detected).

(c) pH of samples after resuspension in sterile saline (2 mg/mL;
pooled WTCX extract was lyophilized and resuspended); average of
three to four measurements.

Table 6. Elemental and ion analysis of extracts of WTC and control
P[M.sub.2.5] samples. (a)

Sample:                    WTCB                 WTCX (pooled)
Diluent:               DI [H.sub.2]O    DI [H.sub.2]O       1 M HCl
No. analyses:                1                2                1

Analyte
S[O.sup.-2.sub.4]         432,600          439,100          379,400
 Ca                       183,800          187,500          196,700
 Mg                           354              651            2,258
 Al                           537 *            555 *          1,477
C[l.sup.-]                                   2,699
 Fe                           6.0 *            6.7 *          1,098
 Zn                           4.1             13.4              410
[Na.sup.+]                                   1,139
N[O.sup.-.sub.3]                             6,496
[F.sup.-]                                      799
 Ti                           4.0              5.2             41.6
 Pb                           0.4              0.7             33.4
 Mn                           0.7              1.8             24.0
 Cu                           4.7              6.4             21.8
 Ba                           7.2              8.7             31.0
 Sb                           7.0              9.4             17.4
N[O.sup.-.sub.2]
 Mo                           4.9              1.8              3.2
 Ni                           1.8              4.1              3.1
 Sn                           0.1 *            1.3              3.1
 Cr                           1.2 *            1.4 *
 Cd                           0.3              0.7              1.9
 Be                          -0.1 *            0.3 *            0.2 *
 Co                           0.1 *            0.8              0.9
N[H.sup.+.sub.4]                               0.0
P[O.sup.-3.sub.4]                              0.0
 As                           0.3              1.1             -0.4 *
 TI                           0.1 *            0.5             -1.2 *
 V
Total [micro]g/g          617,300          639,000          581,600
% Total mass                 61.7             63.9             58.2

Sample:                            WTC3                     SRM (b)
Diluent:               DI [H.sub.2]O       1 M HCl      DI [H.sub.2]O
No. analyses:                4                4                1

Analyte
S[O.sup.-2.sub.4]         376,500          344,400           86,720
 Ca                       184,900          218,000           12,650
 Mg                         1,113            5,414            1,141
 Al                         1,346            4,072            1,049
C[l.sup.-]                  2,851                             1,164
 Fe                            150 *          2,450              407
 Zn                           22.7            1,413              504
[Na.sup.+]                  1,290                             2,153
N[O.sup.-.sub.3]              938                             7,390
[F.sup.-]                     406                               466
 Ti                          12.1              181              1.8
 Pb                           2.2              141            1,379
 Mn                           4.5              108             77.2
 Cu                           5.5             76.0             83.6
 Ba                          25.6             75.6             11.2
 Sb                          17.7             43.8              3.5
N[O.sup.-.sub.2]             38.0
 Mo                           1.0             33.7              1.8
 Ni                           2.6             19.7             32.2
 Sn                           0.8             12.1              0.1 *
 Cr                          10.0                               6.1
 Cd                           0.3              7.2             19.9
 Be                           0.0 *            2.7 *            0.1 *
 Co                           0.2 *            1.6              2.1
N[H.sup.+.sub.4]              0.0                            25,355
P[O.sup.-3.sub.4]             0.0                             3,317
 As                           1.3            -10.4 *           13.5
 TI                           0.1 *          -25.5 *            0.3
 V
Total [micro]g/g          569,600          576,500          143,900
% Total mass                 57.0             57.6             14.4

Sample:                              MSH
Diluent:               DI [H.sub.2]O       1 M HCl
No. analyses:                2                1

Analyte
S[O.sup.-2.sub.4]             955              973
 Ca                           352            1,971
 Mg                          37.3            1,250
 Al                          48.4 *          1,260
C[l.sup.-]                  1,103
 Fe                           0.1 *          1,833
 Zn                           0.0 *            3.7
[Na.sup.+]                    721
N[O.sup.-.sub.3]              0.0
[F.sup.-]                     0.0
 Ti                           1.3             17.6
 Pb                           0.0 *            0.5
 Mn                           3.8             38.4
 Cu                           0.6              6.8
 Ba                           0.1 *            5.0
 Sb                           0.0 *            0.0 *
N[O.sup.-.sub.2]              0.0
 Mo                           0.1              0.1
 Ni                           0.0              0.9
 Sn                           0.0 *            0.0 *
 Cr                           0.1 *
 Cd                           0.0              0.0
 Be                           0.0 *            0.0 *
 Co                           0.0 *            0.4 *
N[H.sup.+.sub.4]              0.0
P[O.sup.-3.sub.4]             0.0
 As                           0.1              0.2
 TI                           0.0 *           -0.1 *
 V
Total [micro]g/g            3,223            7,362
% Total mass                  0.3              0.7

Sample:                            ROFA
Diluent:               DI [H.sub.2]O       1 M HCl
No. analyses:                2                1

Analyte
S[O.sup.-2.sub.4]         275,000          242,300
 Ca                        18,590           19,660
 Mg                        24,900           24,660
 Al                         6,740            8,604
C[l.sup.-]                    302
 Fe                           763           19,510
 Zn                         6,556            5,932
[Na.sup.+]                 44,179
N[O.sup.-.sub.3]              0.0
[F.sup.-]                     352
 Ti                           2.6              138
 Pb                          17.9              790
 Mn                           365              459
 Cu                           573              628
 Ba                           3.0             57.5
 Sb                           1.5              146
N[O.sup.-.sub.2]              0.0
 Mo                           0.0 *            339
 Ni                        17,030           16,990
 Sn                           0.0 *           51.0
 Cr                           6.1
 Cd                           8.9             11.9
 Be                           1.4 *            1.7 *
 Co                           495              510
N[H.sup.+.sub.4]              0.0
P[O.sup.-3.sub.4]             0.0
 As                           1.7              106
 TI                           0.0 *           -0.2 *
 V                          1,749           35,690
Total [micro]g/g          397,600          376,700
% Total mass                 39.8             37.7

Abbreviations: Be, beryllium; Cd, cadmium; Co, cobalt; F, flouride;
N[H.sup.+.sub.4], ammonium; N[O.sup.-.sub.2], nitrite; N[O.sup.-.sub.3],
nitrate; Sn, tin; TI, thallium.

(a) Results shown are average values for number of analyses
indicated, expressed as micrograms soluble analyte per gram solid
sample extracted, for deionized (DI) water and 1 M HCI extractions.
Analytes are arranged in order of decreasing content in WTC3 sample
by whatever analysis provided highest content. Analyte concentrations
were determined by ICP-MS, except values shaded in light blue, which
were determined by ICP-AES, and values shaded in dark blue, which were
determined by IC.

(b) SRM 1649a size-classified to P[M.sub.2.5] (see "Materials and
Methods").

* Indicates value below detection limit.

Acknowledgments: The authors thank M. Zhong, M. Blaustein, S-I. Hsu, J. Duff-7, K. Schermerhorn, M. Lippmann, J. Zelikoff, and M. Costa (New York University School of Medicine); J. Vandenberg, T. Hughes, B. Culpepper, I. Gilmour, J. Lehmann, and H. Hilliard (NHEERL, ORD, U.S. EPA); G. Ross (National Caucus for Black and Aging/Senior Environmental Employees Program, Research Triangle Park, NC); D. Williams and W. Ellenson (ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC); R. Cary and D. Smith (Sunset Laboratory, Forest Grove, OR); and S. Lassell (Department of Nuclear Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC) for their excellent assistance.

LCC and MDC were supported by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences center grant ES00260 and U.S. EPA PM center grant R827351.

REFERENCES

Biran R, Tang YZ, Brook JR, Vincent R, Keeler GJ. 1996. Aqueous extraction of airborne particulate matter collected on hi-vol Teflon filters. Int J Environ Anal Chem 63:315-322.

Birch ME, Cary RA. 1996. Elemental carbon-based method for monitoring occupational exposures to particulate diesel exhaust. Aerosol Sci Technol 25:221-241.

Budavari S, ed. 1996. The Merck Index. 12th ed. Whitehouse Station, NJ:Merck & Co., Inc.

Costa DL, Dreher KL. 1997. Bioavailable transition metals in particulate matter mediate cardiopulmonary injury in healthy and compromised animal models. Environ Health Perspect 105(suppl 5):1053-1060.

Dhingra VK, Uusaro A, Holmes CL, Welley KR. 2001. Attenuation of lung inflammation by adrenergic agonists in murine acute lung injury. Anesthesiology 95:947-953.

Dockery DW, Pope CA 3rd, Xu X, Spengler JD, Ware JH, Fay ME, et al. 1993. An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities. N Engl J Med 329:1753-1759.

Dreher KL, Jaskot RH, Lehmann JR, Richards JH, McGee JK, Ghio AJ, et al. 1997. Soluble transition metals mediate residual oil fly ash induced acute lung injury. J Toxicol Environ Health 50:285-305.

Gavett SH, Haykal-Coates N, Highfill JW, Ledbetter AD, Chen LC, Cohen MD, et al. 2003. World Trade Center fine particulate matter causes respiratory tract hyperresponsiveness in mice. Environ Health Perspect 111:981-991 (2003).

Gavett SH, Madison SL, Stevens MA, Costa DL. 1999. Residual oil fly ash amplifies allergic cytokines, airway responsiveness, and inflammation in mice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 160:1897-1904.

Graham JA, Miller FJ, Davies DW, Hiteshew ME, Walsh LC III. 1985. Inhalation studies of Mt. St. Helens volcanic ash in animals. I. Introduction and exposure system. Environ Res 37:61-71.

Hatch GE, Raub JA, Graham JA. 1984. Functional and biochemical indicators of pneumoconiosis in mice: comparison with rats. J Toxicol Environ Health 13:487-497.

Hoffland. 2002. Hydroxide Precipitation of Metals. Conroe, TX:Hoffland Environmental, Inc. Available: http://www. hofflandenv.com/?structure=./contents/tks/3.xml [accessed 28 October 2002].

Johnson K. 2002. As 9/11 cleanup moves inside, residents battle with emotions. New York Times (New York, NY) 1 July:A1.

Kelley T. 2001. At least a quarter of Ground Zero firefighters ill. New York Times (New York, NY) 21 December:A1.

Kodavanti UP, Hauser R, Christiani DC, Meng ZH, McGee J, Ledbetter A, et al. 1998. Pulmonary responses to oil fly ash particles in the rat differ by virtue of their specific soluble metals. Toxicol Sci 43:204-212.

Ledbetter AD, Killough PM, Hudson GF. 1988. A low-sample-consumption dry-particulate aerosol generator for use in nose-only inhalation exposures. Inhal Toxicol 10:239-251.

Lioy PJ, Weisel CP, Millette JR, Eisenreich S, Vallero D, Offenberg J, et al. 2002. Characterization of the dust/smoke aerosol that settled east of the World Trade Center (WTC) in lower Manhattan after the collapse of the WTC 11 September 2001. Environ Health Perspect 110:703-714.

Mamane Y, Willis RD, Conner TL. 2001. Evaluation of computer-controlled scanning electron microscopy applied to an ambient urban aerosol sample. Aerosol Sci Technol 34:97-107.

McKetta JJ, ed. 1978. Cements, Portland. In: Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design, New York:Marcel Dekker, 82-93.

NCSU (North Carolina State University). 2002. Nuclear Reactor Program: Neutron Activation Analysis. Available: http://www.ne.ncsu.edu/NRP/reactor_program.html [accessed 29 October 2002].

Neubauer U, Mowack B, Furrer G, Schulin R. 2000. Heavy metal sorption of clay minerals affected by the siderophore desferroxamine B. Environ Sci Technol 34:2749-2755.

NIST. 2001. Certificate of Analysis: Standard Reference Material 1849a. Gaithersburg, MD:National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1-22.

NLM (National Library of Medicine). 2002. Hazardous Substances Data Bank. Available: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/ [accessed 28 October 2002].

Offenberg JH, Eisenreich SJ, Chen LC, Cohen MB, Chee G, Prophete C, et al. 2003. Persistent organic pollutants in the dusts that settled across lower Manhattan after September 11, 2001. Environ Sci Technol 37:502-508.

Raabe OG, Al-Bayati MA, Teegue SV, Rasolt A. 1988. Regional deposition of inhaled monodisperse coarse and fine aerosol particles in small laboratory animals. In: Inhaled Particles VI (Dodgson J, McCallum RI, Bailey MR, Fisher DR, eds). Oxford, UK:Pergamon Press, 53-63.

Stellman, JM, ed. 1998. Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety, 4th ed. Geneva:International Labour Office.

Sunset. 2002. Sample Analysis Method for Organic and Elemental Carbon Aerosols. Forest Grove, OR:Sunset Laboratory, Inc. Available: http://www.sunlab.com/ SampleAnalysisMethod.html [accessed 28 October 2002].

U.S. Census Bureau. 2002. Cartographic Products. On-Line Mapping Resources. TIGER Mapping Services. Washington, DC:U.S. Census Bureau. Available: http:// tiger.census.gov/cgi-bin/mapbrowse-tbl [accessed 28 October 2002].

U.S. EPA. 2002a. Toxicological Effects of Fine Particulate Matter Derived from the Destruction of the World Trade Center. EPA/600/R-02/028. Cincinnati, OH:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Available: http://www.epa.gov/ nheerl/wtc./WTC report_7b3i.pdf [accessed 2 April 2003].

--. 2002b. EPA Response to September 11: Daily Environmental Monitoring Summary. Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Available: http://www.epa.gov/wtc/data_summary.htm [accessed 28 October 2002].

--. 2002c. Third External Review Draft of Air Quality Criteria for Particulate Matter (April 2002). Vol II. Research Triangle Park, NC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 8-237. Available: http://www.epa.gov/ncea/pdfs/partmatt/ VOL_I_AQCD PM_3rd_Review_Draft.pdf [accessed 28 October 2002].

--. 2002d. Third External Review Draft of Air Quality Criteria for Particulate Matter (April 2002). Vol I. Research Triangle Park, NC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2-15. Available: http://www.epa.gov/ncea/pdfs/partmatt/ [accessed 28 October 2002].

--. 2002e. Guidelines for the Application of SEM/EDX Analytical Techniques to Particulate Matter Samples. EPA/600/R-02/070. Cincinnati, OH:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

--. 2002f. Method 6020a: Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry. EPA SW-B46. Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Available: http:// www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/test/pdfs/6020a.pdf [accessed 28 October 2002].

--. 2002g. Methods for the Determination of Metals in Environmental Samples. Method 200.7: Determination of Metals and Trace Elements by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry. EPA/600/4-91/010. Cincinnati, OH:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Available: enter "600491010" on search of: http://www.epa.gov/cgi-bin/ claritgw? op-NewSearch&template=epa [accessed 28 October 2002].

USGS. 2002. Environmental Studies of the World Trade Center Area after the September 11, 2001 Attack. Open File Report 0FR-01-0429. Denver, CO:U.S. Geological Survey. Available: http://geology.cr.usgs.gov/pub/open-file-reports/ofr-01-0429/ [accessed 28 October 2002].

Weast RC, ed. 1985. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 66th ed. Boca Raton, FL:CRC Press, Inc.

John K. McGee, (1) Lung Chi Chen, (2) Mitchell D. Cohen, (2) Glen R. Chee, (2) Colette M. Prophete/ Najwa Haykal- Coates, (1) Shirley J. Wasson, (3) Teri L. Conner, (4) Daniel L. Costa, (7) and Stephen H. Gavett (1)

(1) National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA; (2) Nelson Institute of Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, Tuxedo, New York, USA; (3) National Risk Management Research Laboratory, and (4) National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA

This article is part of the mini-monograph "World Trade Center Fine Particulate Matter--Chemistry and Toxic Respiratory Effects."

Address correspondence to S.H. Gavett, Pulmonary Toxicology Branch (Mail Code B143-02), U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 USA. Telephone: [phone]. Fax: [phone]. E-mail: [e-mail]

Acknowledgments of personnel and financial support have been placed at the end of this article. This paper has been reviewed and approved for release by NHEERL, U.S. EPA. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the U.S. EPA, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Received 12 August 2002; accepted 18 November 2002.