Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,632,679 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Charitable status for anti-racism. (Non-Profit Sector).


OTTAWA Ottawa, city, Canada
Ottawa (ŏt`əwə), city (1991 pop. 313,987), capital of Canada, SE Ont., at the confluence of the Ottawa and Rideau rivers. Hull, Que.
 -- Canadian Canadian (kənā`dēən), river, 906 mi (1,458 km) long, rising in NE New Mexico. and flowing E across N Texas and central Oklahoma into the Arkansas River in E Oklahoma.  organizations and groups whose goal is to eliminate racism or are "devoted to promoting positive race relations race relations
Noun, pl

the relations between members of two or more races within a single community

race relations nplrelaciones fpl raciales

 within Canada Canada (kăn`ədə), independent nation (2001 pop. 30,007,094), 3,851,787 sq mi (9,976,128 sq km), N North America. Canada occupies all of North America N of the United States (and E of Alaska) except for Greenland and the French islands of " will be able register as charities under a new proposed policy statement issued by the Charities Directorate.

To qualify for charitable status groups working to eliminate racial inequality racial inequality Racial disparity Social medicine, public health
A disparity in opportunity for socioeconomic advancement or access to goods and services based solely on race. See Women and health.
 or working to promote cultural diversity would have to identify their activities under one or both of these categories:

* the advancement of education. or

* "other purposes beneficial to the community"

In the u.s. and the U.K. antiracist sentiment and the promotion of race relations are recognized as charitable purposes.

Though Canadian courts have not given any guidance whether promoting racial equality would qualify as a charitable purpose, the Directorate "intends to view the promotion of racial equality as consistent with existing broadly-based legislation and public policy."

However, if an anti racist group opposes or lobbies for changes in, or the retention of, the law, existing policy or decisions of any level of government, these actions would be considered political activities as defined by-the Tax Act, and not a charitable purpose. But the proposed policy does not consider it political activity when an "organization ensures conformity with existing laws, in the course of opposing racial discrimination."

However, fostering good relations between countries would be unacceptable as this would be considered a foreign policy matter and deemed a political activity, and "fostering relations between two disparate communities abroad is similarly not charitable because public benefit cannot be ascertained as·cer·tain  
tr.v. as·cer·tained, as·cer·tain·ing, as·cer·tains
1. To discover with certainty, as through examination or experimentation. See Synonyms at discover.

2.
."
COPYRIGHT 2003 Community Action Publishers
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:new policy of Charities Directorate
Publication:Community Action
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1CANA
Date:Apr 14, 2003
Words:247
Previous Article:Periodicals received.(Bibliography)
Next Article:Alberta cuts number of bargaining units in health care. (Health).(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
From the book of numbers. (signs of the times).(Better Business Bureau reports on charitable contributions)(Brief Article)(Statistical Data Included)
Allow charities to spend more on advocacy and lobbying -- IMPACS Report.(Institute for Media, Policy and Civil Society)(Brief Article)
Do not call registry could hurt charities: volunteers would be able to make fundraising solicitations.(Statistical Data Included)(Brief Article)
Charities reform: flexible sanctions and accessible appeals.(Brief Article)
New guideline for U.S. charities overseas may make them targets.(VOLUNTARY SECTOR)
Too many nonprofits? It really depends on who's counting.(Opinion)
Behind closed doors: sector discussions need open air.(Opinion)
Private benefit: it can jeopardize your exempt status.(Taxing Issues)
Self-regulation draft flawed: lack of real discussion damages attempts at consensus.(COUNTERPOINT)
Caucus and IRA laws: Congress refocusing on the charitable sector.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles