Characterization of the dust/smoke aerosol that settled east of the World Trade Center (WTC) in Lower Manhattan after the collapse of the WTC 11 September 2001. (Research Articles).

The explosion and collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) was a catastrophic event that produced an aerosol plume impacting many workers, residents, and commuters during the first few days after 11 September 2001. Three bulk samples of the total settled dust and smoke were collected at weather-protected locations east of the WTC on 16 and 17 September 2001; these samples are representative of the generated material that settled immediately after the explosion and fire and the concurrent collapse of the two structures. We analyzed each sample, not differentiated by particle size, for inorganic and organic composition. In the inorganic analyses, we identified metals, radionuclides, ionic species, asbestos, and inorganic species. In the organic analyses, we identified polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls, polychlorinated dibenzodioxins, polychlorinated dibenzofurans, pesticides, phthalate esters, brominated diphenyl ethers, and other hydrocarbons. Each sample had a basic pH, Asbestos levels ranged from 0.8% to 3.0% of the mass, the PAHs were > 0.1% of the mass, and lead ranged from 101 to 625 [micro] g/g. The content and distribution of material was indicative of a complex mixture of building debris and combustion products in the resulting plume. These three samples were composed primarily of construction materials, soot, paint (leaded and unleaded), and glass fibers (mineral wool and fiberglass). Levels of hydrocarbons indicated unburned or partially burned jet fuel, plastic, cellulose, and other materials that were ignited by the fire. In morphologic analyses we found that a majority of the mass was fibrous and composed of many types of fibers (e.g., mineral wool, fiberglass, asbestos, wood, paper, and cotton). The particles were separated into size classifications by gravimetric and aerodynamic methods. Material < 2.5 [micro] m in aerodynamic diameter was 0.88-1.98% of the total mass. The largest mass concentrations were > 53 [micro] m in diameter. The results obtained from these samples can be used to understand the contact and types of exposures to this unprecedented complex mixture experienced by the surviving residents, commuters, and rescue workers directly affected by the plume from 11 to 12 September and the evaluations of any acute or long-term health effects from resuspendable dust and smoke to the residents, commuters, and local workers, as well as from the materials released after 11 September until the fires were extinguished. Further, these results support the need to have the interior of residences, buildings, and their respective HVAC systems professionally cleaned to reduce long-term residential risks before rehabitation. Key words: aerosol, inorganic components, morphologic characterization, organic components, World Trade Center.

**********

The 11 September 2001 attack on the World Trade Center (WTC) in New York City (NYC) resulted in an intense fire and the subsequent complete collapse of the two main structures and adjacent buildings. It also led to significant damage to many surrounding buildings within and around the WTC complex. The 16-acre area has become known as Ground Zero. A consequence of the pulverization of buildings and the fires was the development of a large plume of dust and smoke that released both particles and gases into the atmosphere. The initial plume impacted all directions immediately adjacent to the WTC site, and the dust and smoke settled at many outdoor and indoor locations. From the first hours to 18 hr after the collapse, the winds transported the plume to the east (Figure 1) and then to the southeast across and beyond Brooklyn, New York.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

To begin assessing the exposure to dust and smoke among the residential and commuter population during the first few days, samples of particles that initially settled in downtown NYC were taken from three undisturbed protected locations to the east of the WTC site. Two samples were taken on day 5 (16 September 2001) and the third sample was taken on day 6 (17 September 2001) after the terrorist attack. The purposes for collecting the samples were a) to determine the chemical and physical characteristics of the material that was present in the dust and smoke that settled from the initial plume, and b) to determine the absence or presence of contaminants that could affect acute or long-term human health by inhalation or ingestion. It was anticipated that the actual compounds and materials present in the plume would be similar to those found in building fires or implosion of collapsed buildings. The primary differences would be the simultaneous occurrence of each type of event, the intense fire (> 1,000[degrees]C), the extremely large mass of material (> 10 x [10.sup.6] tons) reduced to dust and smoke, and the previously unseen degree of pulverization of the building materials. A summary of the potentially present types of carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic materials was reported in EHP in November 2001 (1).

The dust and smoke would be inhaled by individuals either directly or after the settled aerosol was resuspended by turbulence. Deposition and retention of the dust and smoke on surfaces inside homes, as well as the residuals of dust and smoke remaining if residences and building ventilation systems were not properly cleaned before rehabitation, would be available for uptake by children and adults via nondietary ingestion. Indoor inhalation exposures would also be possible because of resuspension from the ventilation system. Any large-particle inhalation could also lead to ingestion exposure after particles are cleared from the upper airways of the lung by mucocilliary clearance processes.

A number of initial measurements made by various organizations focused on the general composition of the dust and smoke, with a primary concern being asbestos (1). The approach we used for analyzing the three dust and smoke samples included detailed measurement of the inorganic and organic components of the mass and a general characterization of the percent distribution by mass or volume of various materials present in each sample.

Samples of the total settled dust and smoke were collected at three different locations. The first sample was collected from protected external ledges around the entrance of a building on Cortlandt Street, which is one block east of the WTC building complex. The initial direction of the plume was from west to east (Figure 1); thus, the other two samples were collected at locations to the east of Cortlandt Street. These two samples were collected from 10-15 cm-thick deposits that were on the top of two automobiles about 0.7 km from the WTC site. The automobiles were in locations protected from rain that occurred on Friday, 15 September 2001. One automobile was located on Cherry Street, and the other was on Market Street, one and two city blocks, respectively, west of the East River between the Manhattan and Brooklyn Bridges. These cars appeared to have been in their respective locations since 11 September, but it is possible that each could have been moved from an adjacent thoroughfare on the east side of NYC (FDR Drive).

One of the reasons for collecting samples from these locations was to determine whether chemical composition and physical morphology of the particles changed with distance from the WTC site. The samples were collected using the protocols established for surface soil collection in our studies of the dispersal of chromium-laden hazardous waste in Jersey City, New Jersey (2), and the National Human Exposure Assessment Survey (3). After collection, all samples were stored in a 4[degrees]C room prior to sending the subfractions to individual laboratories for analysis. We maintained chain of custody throughout sample transferal and analyses.

Methods

Approach

The analyses conducted on each sample were based on the nature of the sources of the particles that were aerosolized on 11 September 2001. The force of the collapse pulverized the two main WTC structures and several adjacent low-rise buildings (e.g., WTC3, WTC7); therefore, our analytic plan included qualitative and quantitative analyses to detect construction and furnishing debris, and combustible materials and products of incomplete combustion associated with the fires in each building. We accomplished the tasks by completing analyses to identify inorganic and organic constituents.

We designed the first sets of analyses to provide a general characterization of the content of the samples using a combination of microscopic techniques. This provided an opportunity to classify the general morphology and to focus the chemical analyses subsequently performed on each sample based on the types of materials detected by the microscopic analyses. The second type of analyses included the inorganic analyses (including trace and toxic elements, ionic species, and functional groups) and the organic analyses [including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), pesticides, dioxins, furans, phthalate esters, and general hydrocarbons]. All of these analyses were performed exclusively on the total of bulk samples.

The third set of analyses included the particle size fractionation experiments on each sample. We used two different approaches: a) a gravimetric sieving analysis that separated the mass of lint and nonfibrous material into fractions > 300 [micro] m, 75-300 [micro] m, and < 75 [micro] m in diameter; and b) an aerodynamic separation for the particle size fractions of < 2.5 [micro] m, 2.5-10 [micro] m, and 10-53 [micro] m in diameter, with a gravimetric sieving that separated the particles > 53 [micro] m in diameter before the aerodynamic sizing of the samples. The separations were based on the design or availability of specific size separation techniques in the laboratories.

We selected all of the analyses described above for the three bulk samples based on the nature of the events and the materials that could be associated with the buildings and the burning jet fuel. The collapse resulted in a pulverization of the buildings. Thus, it was important to complete morphologic analyses to obtain a general idea about the composition and the structure of the particles that were produced from the building materials. We conducted the organic analyses to determine the chemical nature of the products of incomplete combustion produced by the fires and to identify any other organic materials. The inorganic analyses were completed to obtain quantitative information on the levels of various heavy metals and other inorganic materials present in the pulverized building materials and in the fire. Finally, we conducted the particle size analyses to provide a general description of the types and levels of material available that could be inhaled and deposited in various locations within the lung. These size-separated samples were stored for analyses of the same compounds in the individual size fractions. These results are the subject of future manuscripts.

Analytic Methods

Because each of the total mass dust and smoke samples was determined to contain a complex mixture of materials, the analytic plan required the inclusion of a number of different techniques for examining chemical and physical characteristics. Our approach included microscopic analysis to identify major components and the morphology of particles in each sample. Using stereomicroscopy, we estimated relative percentages of larger particles and identified large dust components. We used polarized light microscopy with microchemical testing to identify most particles including minerals, building products, and hair and fibers > 1 [micro] m in diameter. We used scanning electron microscopy with X-ray elemental analysis to identify metal fragments, building product pieces, and other particles < 1 [micro] m. Transmission electron microscopy, with electron diffraction and X-ray elemental analysis was used to identify the smallest fraction of particles including single asbestos fibrils and carbon soot.

We extracted the portions of each total mass sample (not differentiated by particles size) for determination of trace and toxic elements by inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy; ion chromatography was used to determine the ionic and cationic components of the mass. Other portions of each total mass sample were then extracted and analyzed for organic constituents. We included materials that are typically measured in air or dust samples by gas chromatographic and mass spectrometric techniques; we then scanned for unknown extracts using other mass spectroscopic analyses. Other analyses completed on these total mass samples included the measurement of pH, corrosion, aerodynamic particle size for fine and coarse particle fractions, percentage of mass by particle sieving, general radiation levels, and asbestos. Details on each analysis conducted on the three dust and smoke samples are provided below.

Morphologic and gravimetric analyses. The dust samples were characterized by both gravimetric measurement of sieved size fractions and by polarized light microscopy analyses. The samples were sieved using standard 4-inch diameter brass sieves (U.S. Standard Sieve Mesh 50 and 200) as reported previously (4). The gravimetric determinations were made in triplicate with a SETRA EZ2-500 electronic 3-place balance (Setra Systems, Inc., Boxborough, MA). All sample-handling activities were performed inside a hood with a HEPA exhaust filter. Samples were separated into fibrous (lint) and nonfibrous fractions using tweezers under the stereomicroscope. Indoor dust has been shown to be composed of both fibrous and nonfibrous fractions (5). The fibrous and nonfibrous parts are expected to respond differently to dust disruptions, which include cleaning procedures.

We determined the weight of the lint (plus attached fine nonfibrous particulate). The remaining particulate was then dry sieved at the following size fractions: > 300 [micro] m (collected on Mesh 50), 75-300 [micro] m (collected on Mesh 200), < 75 [micro] m (through Mesh 200). The weight of each fraction was determined and the relative weight percentages were then calculated. The lint fraction is found in the large (> 300 [micro] m) fraction. The fractions were combined and examined by stereomicroscopy using a Zeiss Stemi 2000 stereomicroscope (Carl Zeiss, Inc., Thornwood, NY) with a magnification range of 6.5x to 47x. The physical characteristics of the samples were then analyzed using an Olympus BH-2 polarized light microscope (Olympus America, Inc., Melville, NY) with a magnification range of 40x to 1,000x. A visual estimate was made of the relative percentage by volume of loosely aggregated separable fibrous lint (hair + natural fibers + manmade fibers).

Each sample was characterized morphologically for major constituents using a form developed by MVA (4,6). Identified constituents were then rated as to whether it was "common" (consistently found throughout the sample) or "present" (detected but infrequently) (7-11). This designation does not necessarily indicate the relative abundance of a constituent by weight or volume within a sample; it is an indictor of numerical abundance of a constituent. The < 75 [micro] m size fraction portion was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), which was performed using a JEOL 6400 (JEOL Inc., Peabody, MA) equipped with a Noran Voyager energy dispersive X-ray analysis unit (Noran Instruments, Inc., Middleton, WI) and both the secondary and backscattered modes. For SEM analysis, portions of the particles from the sample were transferred to conductive carbon tape and coated with a thin layer of carbon to provide a conductive surface in the electron microscope. Using the backscattered electron mode, the sample was examined for particles that contained heavy elements. This procedure is useful in locating particles containing toxic metals such as lead and cadmium. Using the secondary electron mode, the sample was examined for particles that were consistent with asbestos fibers. We performed X-ray elemental analysis (energy dispersive spectrometry) on each particle located for further study by either the backscattered electron or secondary electron scans. We prepared the < 75 [micro] m size fraction of the samples following the ASTM D6602 procedure (6) and analyzed them with analytic electron microscopy using a JEOL 1200, 100 kV scanning transmission electron microscope equipped with a Noran energy dispersive spectrometry X-ray analysis system. Each sample was subjected to morphologic and gravimetric analyses.

Aerodynamic particle separation. The samples were first mechanically separated using a sieve with a mesh size of 53 [micro] m. The fraction of particles < 53 [micro] m was further separated aerodynamically into three size fractions: 10-53 [micro] m, 2.5-10 [micro] m, and < 2.5 [micro] m. Particles were resuspended by a jet of filtered air passing through an inlet (Wedding Inlet, 10 [micro] m cut size; Anderson Instrument Co., Fultonville, NY) before entering a cyclone with a cut size of 2.5 [micro] m (BGI, Inc., Waltham, MA). Particles between 10 and 2.5 [micro] m were collected by the cyclone, whereas particles < 2.5 [micro] m, which penetrated through the cyclone, were collected on Teflon filters.

Corrosion. We evaluated the corrosive properties of the dust samples using copper mirrors. For each dust sample, a small amount was sprinkled onto a copper mirror and a second copper mirror was set aside as a control; hence, there were a total of three exposed mirrors and three controls. These six mirrors were placed in a sealed container together with a beaker of water to maintain the relative humidity near 100%. After a 14-day exposure, the samples were examined for pinholes and discoloration.

Radionuclides. We analyzed the gamma spectrum of the samples using an EG&G/Ortec high-purity Ge detector (50% relative efficiency) gamma counter (EG&G/Ortec Instruments, Inc., Oak Ridge, TN). We analyzed approximately 50 peaks based on statistical significance (counting/lack of interferences). These included thorium, uranium, actinium series, and primordial radionuclides. Liquid scintillation analyses were conducted for emissions on the total dust and smoke samples using a Packard Tri-Carb Model 2770 TR/SL (Packard Instrument, Meriden, CT). The MDA for alpha radioactivity was 0.30 DPM (0.14 pCi) based on a NIST-traceable [sup.226]Ra standard (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD). When placed in the liquid scintillation fluid, the WTC samples are somewhat darker than the backgrounds and calibration standard, which may cause slight underreporting of the beta activity due to quenching and standard-to-sample efficiency bias.

Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) analysis for trace and toxic elements. All samples were analyzed in duplicate for trace or toxic elements. Approximately 0.1 g of sample was accurately weighed and placed in a CEM HP500 microwave vessel (CEM Corporation, Matthews, NC). Fisher optima concentrated nitric acid (10 mL) was then added to the vessels. The six sample vessels plus those of two method blanks were sealed and placed in the CEM MARS microwave unit at 1,200 watts for 5 min. The samples were allowed to cool for approximately 15 min inside the MARS unit and were then removed and placed in the cold room for 1 hr at 4[degrees]C. After cooling, the samples were then diluted to 50 mL. A 2-mL aliquot was then diluted to 8 mL for a final acid concentration of 5%.

We scanned the samples for metals on a Fissons PQ3 ICP/MS (Fissons Instruments, Inc., Merrimac, MA) over a mass range of 9-238 at 1,350 watts, with a dwell time of 1,000 [micro] sec with 40 sweeps for a total acquisition time of 70 sec. We used high purity multielement standard and NIST A&B calibrant for quality control. Acceptable quality assurance checks were deemed to be 100 [+ or -] 20% of the certified values.

Ion chromatography for ionic species and pH analyses. We weighed the samples (Fisher Scientific XT Balance; Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) and placed them in test tubes; aliquots of distilled, deionized water were added to make a concentration of approximately 30 mg/mL. The tubes were inverted several times and were then sonicated. The samples were left at room temperature for several days before centrifugation. The extract from each filter sample was removed to a new test tube before centrifugation. All samples were centrifuged and the supernatant was removed to new tubes and stored in the refrigerator.

A 1-mL aliquot of extract was used for pH measurement. This was performed using an Orion Research Digital pH Meter 611 (Dionex Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA). The ion analysis was performed using a Dionex DX500 system. The anion analyses column-IonPac AS14 (Dionex) was used in Suppressor-ASRS Ultra-AutoSuppressor Recycle Mode. The eluent was 3.5 mM [Na.sub.2]C[O.sub.3]/1.0mM NaHC[O.sub.3]. We used cation analyses column IonPac CS12A in the Suppressor-CSRS II Ultra-AutoSuppressor Recycle Mode. The eluent was 20 mM methanesulfonic acid.

We constructed calibration curves using seven standards prepared by diluting a NIST-traceable standard (Fisher) using Milli-Q water. Each standard was subsequently run as a sample to verify the calibration curve. Samples were run once the calibration curve was verified. After all samples were analyzed, these seven standards were analyzed again, followed by two additional NIST traceable stock standards (Dionex). Samples that were originally off scale were diluted with Milli-Q water and tested again.

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometry. Each sample was analyzed for functional groups by FTIR after a portion of the sample was converted to a standard infrared pellet. The pellet was made by combining a small quantity of sample dust material (~ 30 mg) and approximately 200 mg of spectrograde potassium bromide powder (ICL Laboratories, Garfield, NJ). This mixture was preliminarily ground together using an agate motor and pestle, then transferred to a metal vial and placed in a mixing mill (SPEX Model 5300; SPEX Industries, Edison, NJ) and agitated for 30 sec at approximately 50 cycles/sec. The resultant homogeneous mixture was then transferred to a die (13 mm Macro-Micro KBr pellet die; ICL Laboratories) connected to a vacuum pump, which was placed in a lab press. Approximately 8,500 psi was applied to the mixture for 30 secs. The resulting infrared pellet consisted of a mid-infrared transparent solid matrix of potassium bromide containing a uniform distribution of the dust sample to be analyzed.

We obtained all infrared spectra using an FTIR Spectrometer (Mattson Instruments, Madison, WI) (12). The spectrometer was configured to obtain standard transmission FTIR spectra using a deuterated triglycine sulfate detector. Each spectrum collected was an average of 200 scans at 4/cm resolution. The resulting profile was illustrated as a plot of percent transmittance of infrared radiation as a function of wave number from 4,000 to 450/cm. The transmission spectra of the three samples were then examined for functional group content.

Volatile organic compounds. We used thermal desorption (Perkin-Elmer ATD400; Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT) with a gas chromatograph (GC)/MS detector (Hewlett Packard 5890/5971; Hewlett Packard, Wilmington, DE) to analyze samples of dust from the destruction of the World Trade Center complex for volatile organic compounds. Approximately 200 mg of each of the three samples were heated at 180[degrees]C for 1 min in a stainless steel tube with the emitted compounds transferred in a helium stream to a Tenax absorbent trap (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA) held at -28[degrees]C. The absorbent trap was heated to 250[degrees]C within a few seconds, with the compounds transferred to a capillary GC/MS. Full scan mass spectra were collected above 30 atomic mass units (amu) to identify the volatile compounds.

The chromatographic peaks were identified based on comparisons to standards run under the same conditions as the samples, evaluation of the mass spectral pattern, and library matches within the Wiley Mass Spectra Library (The Wiley/NBS Registry of Mass Spectral Data). Due to the unresolved background present in the chromatograph after a retention time of 20 min, we performed a background subtraction of an area near each peak of interest before the library search.

Semivolatile organic chemical analysis. Many of the compounds or compound classes measured for semivolatile organics were analyzed by well-established techniques for PAHs, PCBs, dioxins, and furans. However, because the fire at the WTC was very complex and included the burning of fuel, plastics, furniture, and other materials, we conducted additional analyses to detect and quantify unknown organics in the total mass samples. These are described below.

Standard PAH, chlordane, and PCB analyses. Each sample was analyzed by GC/MS on a Hewlett Packard 6890/5973 for 40 individual PAHs and six chlordane species (oxy-chlordane, trans-chlordane, cis-chlordane, trans-nonachlor, cis-nonachlor, and MC5), and by GC/electron capture detection with a Hewlett Packard 6890 equipped with a [sup.63]Ni electron capture detector for quantification of 68 PCB congeners, hexachlorobenzene, DDTs (4,4'-DDE, 2,4'-DDT, and 4,4'-DDT), and mirex (13,14). By weighing triplicate aliquots of approximately 0.7 g of each dust sample, ultrasonically extracting each in 30 mL dichloromethane, and reducing the volume before analysis, we identified and quantified all compounds against known concentrations of authentic standards and NIST Standard Reference Material 1649a (Urban Dust, Organics) (15), which was processed in parallel with each sample for comparison and verification of the results.

Unknown semivolatile hydrocarbon identification. The analysis for semivolatile organic compounds included microwave-assisted solvent extraction (MASE) followed by GC/ion trap mass spectrometer (ITMS) (16,17). MASE was carried out using an MDS-2000 microwave extraction system (CEM) equipped with an inboard pressure control system. The MDS-2000 is able to extract 12 samples simultaneously in Teflon PFA-lined extraction vessels under approximately the same conditions of temperature and pressure. A 2.5-g portion of each sample was accurately weighed and quantitatively transferred into Teflon PFA-lined extraction vessels of the MDS-2000. We added extraction solvents (7.5 mL methylene chloride-acetone; 1:1 v/v) to each vessel and fitted new rupture membranes into each cap, which screwed onto the vessel. We then placed the vessels symmetrically on the microwave turntable. After the extraction was completed, the vessels were allowed to cool before the caps were opened. After cooling, we transferred 1.5 mL extract from the supernatant of the vessels into GC vials without a pre-concentration step before GC/ITMS analysis.

We performed GC/MS on a Varian 3400 CX GC coupled to a Saturn 2000 GC/MS ITMS (Varian Instruments, Palo Alto, CA). A septum programmable split/splitless injector was used in the splitless mode. The GC was equipped with a 30-m 5% phenyl/95% dimethylsilicone fused silica DB-XLB capillary column with 0.32 mm i.d. and 0.25 [micro] m film thickness (J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA).

The ITMS was operated in electron ionization-positive mode and optimized with perfluorotributylamine (FC-34) using automatic gain control. The electron multiplier, emission current, and modulation amplitude were set at 1,800 V, 10 [micro] A, and 7.5 V, respectively. The transfer line and the ion trap manifold were set to 270[degrees]C and 225[degrees]C, respectively. The mass range scanned was from 45 to 450 m/z at 0.3-0.6 sec/scan. We used Saturn GC/MS workstation version 5.3 software for data acquisition.

We identified the analytes by comparing the mass spectrum (after background subtraction) to the vendor's library and NIST 98 library spectrum. As with the identification of other unknowns, we defined a positive identification as one with a correlation to the library spectrum of > 85% fit. We added EPA 525 internal standards (Supelco) to the sample run as quality control checks for rough quantitation and retention time quality control. A secondary identification was performed using retention time confirmation with quality control standards, when available. We analyzed a 1-[micro] L aliquot of standard with the GC/ITMS system under the same conditions used for samples and quality control samples. Approximately 300 semivolatile organic compound standards including EPA 525, 625, and 8270 standards (Supelco) were injected to build the GC retention time library. We defined a retention time match as an analyte compound eluting within [+ or -] 5 sec of the standard sample retention time. All reported compounds met these criteria.

Polychlorinated dioxins (PCDDs) and furans (PCDFs). We used U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Methods 1613 and RCRA SW846 Method 8290 for dioxin analyses (18,19). In these methods, a clean extraction thimble was charged with 5.0 g of 100/200-mesh silica topped with 100 g of quartz sand. The silica layer was left undisturbed throughout the extraction process. The thimble was placed in a clean extractor with 30-40 mL of toluene in the receiver and 200-250 mL of toluene in the flask. The wet sample, filter, and/or disk were loaded and any nonaqueous liquid removed. The remaining sample was placed in the thimble and manually mixed into the sand layer with a clean metal spatula, carefully breaking up any large lumps of sample.

The dust and smoke extracts, which were blown to dryness in conical vials and refrigerated, were analyzed via GC/high-resolution mass spectrometry (GC/HRMS) after the addition of an internal standard and nonane. We programmed the column temperature to separate the 2,3,7,8-TCDD congener from other TCDD analytes. The tetra congeners had to be eluted from the column after 20 min for this to occur. The seventeen congeners of interest were then detected with the HRMS. We identified compounds eluting from the GC column by the retention time reference obtained from the corresponding labeled isotope and the ion ratio of the measured ions during selective ion response. We calculated the concentration of each congener by using the relative response factors of each native congener to its respective 13C12-labeled congener.

Standards used in the analyses were concentration of stock and spiking solutions containing PCDDs/PCDFs and labeled compounds. We included a cleanup standard ([Cl.sub.4], 2,3,7,8-TCDD, 0.8 ng/mL) and internal standards ([Cl.sub.2], 1,2,3,4-TCDD, 200 ng/mL; and [Cl.sub.2], 1,2,3,7,8,9-hexaCDD, 200 ng/mL).

Brominated diphenyl ethers. The analytic methodology for detecting brominated diphenyls and diphenyl ethers have been described previously (20). Briefly, we subjected total dust samples to enhanced solvent extraction using methylene chloride. Extracts were purified by size exclusion and silica gel liquid chromatography. Compound quantification was performed by GC with halogen-selective electrolytic conductivity detection with multipoint calibration. Decachlorodiphenyl ether was used as an internal standard. 2,2',4,4',5,6',6'-Octachlorobiphenyl was added before extraction as a surrogate standard, and results were corrected for its recovery (mean [+ or -] SD, 68.1 [+ or -] 2.02). We confirmed compound identities by GC/MS in the full scan electron ionization mode. None of the target compounds were detected in the blank.

Results

The general characteristics of each total settled dust and smoke sample are shown in Table 1; these characteristics indicate that the composition of major components in each sample were similar, with slight differences in total composition for the Market Street sample. Generally, the samples were very light and fluffy, and were white to pinkish-gray. The general physical appearance of the Market Street sample is shown in Figure 2 as an example. The mass of each sample was dominated by nonfibrous material and construction debris, and the Cortlandt and Cherry Street samples contained approximately 0.8% asbestos. In contrast, of the mass collected, the Market Street sample contained 3.0% asbestos. We found only background levels of alpha radionuclide activity by liquid scintillation counter analysis of all three samples. Beta activity was slightly elevated, but not more than twice the background level. There were no levels of gamma activity > 1 Bq/g except for naturally occurring potassium-40.

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

The pH of an aqueous suspension of each sample was > 7; the Cortlandt Street sample had a pH of 11.5. Both the Cherry and Market Street samples had a pH of [approximately equal to] 9 (Table 1). Significant amounts ([approximately equal to] 10% of the mass) of cellulose were found in all three samples. This observation is consistent with the release of large amounts of disintegrated paper and other products that were originally part of the indoor work environments. We detected no differences between the exposed copper mirrors and the controls, indicating that these dust samples were not corrosive toward base metals. This finding is consistent with the pH measurements.

Morphologic analyses. Detailed morphologic analyses of each sample supported the general characterizations presented in Table 1.

Cortlandt Street sample. The Cortlandt Street sample was mainly composed of construction debris [including vermiculite, plaster, synthetic foam, glass fragments, paint particles, glass fibers, lead (Figure 3), calcite grains, and paper fragments], quartz grains, low-temperature combustion material (including charred woody fragments), and glass shards. Chrysotile asbestos fibers were estimated to comprise < 1% of the sample by volume, and much of the chrysotile adhered to carbonate binder. Some skin cells and dyed cotton fibers were present (5,21-23). The findings of skin cells was consistent with the types of particles usually found in dust in the indoor environment.

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

Approximately 35% of the volume of the sample was in the form of loosely consolidated clumps of fibrous lint, of which the greatest portion was glass fibers. An example of the typical form of the glass fibers is shown in Figure 4. In many cases the width was [congruent to] 1 [micro] m (to > 10 [mirco] m), and the length ranged from 5 to 100 [micro] m. The fiber shown in Figure 4 is not a "clean" glass fiber; other materials are agglomerated along the rod. This is typical of features noted for many different types of particles in each sample. The SEM analysis of the fraction < 75 [micro] m in diameter revealed many glass fibers and cement particles, some in a fibrous form containing calcium, silicon, and sulfur, and some particles were composed of calcium carbonate (Figure 5).

[FIGURES 4-5 OMITTED]

Chrysotile asbestos fibers, identified by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), were found in the < 75-[micro] m fraction. None of the analyzed particles contained lead, chromium, cadmium, or mercury, although chromium and cadmium were quantified in this sample by ICP/MS analyses.

Cherry Avenue sample. The Cherry Avenue sample is mainly composed of construction debris (including cement, vermiculite, plaster, synthetic foam, glass fragments, mineral wool fibers, paint particles, glass fibers, metals, calcite grains, and paper fragments), quartz grains, low-temperature combustion material (including charred woody fragments), and metal flakes. We estimated that chrysotile asbestos fibers comprised < 1% of the sample by volume. Much of the chrysotile asbestos had carbonate binder adhered to it. We observed some hair fibers and tarry fragments in the sample. Approximately 10% of the volume of the sample was in the form of loosely consolidated clumps of fibrous lint, of which the greatest portion was glass fibers. The SEM analysis of the fraction < 75 [micro] m in diameter revealed many glass fibers and cement particles, some in a fibrous form, containing calcium, silicon, and sulfur.

We used SEM and TEM to examine chrysotile asbestos fibers, lead paint fragments, iron-chromium particles, and soot particles found in the < 75-[micro] m fraction. The soot particles were in the submicron size range (Figure 6). No particles containing cadmium (detected by ICP/MS) or mercury were found at less than minimum detection limits in the 1,000 particles analyzed from this sample.

[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]

Market Street sample. The Market Street sample was also composed of construction debris (including vermiculite, plaster, synthetic foam, glass fragments, paint particles, mineral wool fibers, glass fibers, calcite grains, and paper fragments), quartz grains, low-temperature combustion material (including charred woody fragments), and metal flakes. Chrysotile asbestos fibers made up < 1% of the sample by volume, and much of the chrysotile adhered to carbonate binder. This result is different from the bulk mass results, which indicated 3.0% asbestos; this indicates that the sample was not homogeneous. Some dyed cotton fibers, tarry fragments, pollen grains, and metal flakes were also present. Approximately 10% of the volume of the sample was in the form of loosely consolidated clumps of fibrous lint, of which the greatest portion was glass fibers. The SEM analysis of the fraction < 75 [micro] m in diameter revealed many glass fibers and cement particles, some in a fibrous form containing calcium, silicon, and sulfur.

Chrysotile asbestos fibers, identified by TEM, were found in the fine fraction. We found no particles containing lead, chromium, cadmium, or mercury in the single particles analyzed from the Market Street sample, although all but mercury were detected by the ICP/MS analyses.

The morphologic differences between each of the collected samples were minor and could be attributed to the fact that we analyzed only 1,000 particles per sample. This limitation in particle number would preclude consistent detection of all materials that comprise < 0.1% of each sample.

A minor difference between the Cortlandt Street and the Market and Cherry Street samples was that the Cortlandt Street sample had 0.88% fine particles (particles < 2.5 [micro] m in diameter), while the other two samples had > 1.1% fine particle mass. Using microscopic analysis to generally describe the distribution of materials among the mass fractions, we found that large particles were primarily made up of building materials including gypsum, glass fiber, mineral wool fibers, wood fibers, and paper fragments. Chrysotile adhered to building material, chrysotile bundles, and plaster were also components of large particles. This is consistent with the fact that the lint with fibrous particle bundles was in the > 300-[micro] m particle size range.

The smaller particles (< 75 [micro] m in diameter) included asbestos, soot, lead, and other trace elements. This is consistent with the dual nature of the event--the collapse of two buildings overlaying intensely burning structures--which would result primarily in individual and population exposures to large particles and in much lower exposures to fine particles. However, the large amounts of material in the air during the first 2 days could lead to high exposures within unprotected individuals.

Inorganic and metals. The concentrations of elements found in the samples are shown in Table 2, which provides values for an array of elements detectable by ICP/MS. The levels of many of the elements are consistent with their presence in building materials, including chromium, magnesium, manganese, aluminum, and barium. The very high levels of titanium (> 0.1%) were due to their presence in paint, especially white paint. The lead levels are elevated due to the use of lead-based paint on metallic surfaces during construction of the building. The detected lead dust concentrations were lower than would be found outdoors in older cities affected by tailpipe emissions from leaded gasoline (24). The lead levels, however, could not be discounted in concerns about exposure. Because of the large mass of material deposited within rehabitable buildings throughout lower Manhattan, surface loading could enhance potential nondietary exposures (25). In contrast, mercury was not at quantifiable levels, and the concentrations of arsenic and cadmium were relatively low, but in the micrograms/gram (parts per million) concentration range.

In addition to the elements quantified by ICP/MS analyses, the SEM dispersive X-ray analyses showed large signals for iron and calcium, which are major components of construction materials. Similar observations were found for silicon, which is consistent with the glass fragments and fiberglass found in each sample. FTIR functional group analysis detected a signal that is indicative of calcium sulfate dihydrate, a component of gypsum board, and calcium carbonate, which is extensively used as filler for many materials. Other SEM analyses found signals of trace elements, which are indicative of fiberglass and other nonorganic fibers, especially asbestos fiber.

We found detectable levels of typical anionic and cationic species that are usually measured in aerosol samples (ion chromatography results shown in Table 1). We found chloride and sulfate in all samples. The Cortlandt, Cherry, and Market Street samples had sulfate levels of 41,400, 35,200, and 42,100 ng/g, respectively, which probably were formed in the fires. We also detected calcium in the nanograms per gram concentration range; this is probably a result of the pulverization of building materials, with Cortlandt, Cherry, and Market Streets having values of 18,200, 14,000, and 17,000 ng/g, respectively. The high calcium levels are consistent with the FTIR and morphologic analyses. A major difference between these samples was that Cortlandt Street had approximately three times the levels of both fluoride and chloride as the other streets.

PAHs. In the morphologic analyses, we found that the particles < 75 [micro] m in diameter were gray. Thus, we focused the analyses on products of incomplete combustion as well as other organic species. The results for PAHs are shown in Tables 3 and 4. For the three dust and smoke samples, which were undifferentiated by particle size, the total concentrations of 40 typical PAHs with higher molecular weights were in excess of 200-300 [micro] g/g. The distribution of the 40 PAH compounds are shown in Figure 7, with levels of individual PAHs ranging from hundreds of nanograms per gram to > 40 [micro] g/g. Benzo[a]pyrene ranged from 12 to 24 [micro] g/g, with the highest values detected at Cortlandt Street. The values for phenanthrene ranged from 22 to 44 [micro] g/g, with the highest value also detected at the Cortlandt Street.

[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]

We found other PAHs in each sample (Table 4); for example, 7H-benzo[e]fluorene and 11H-benzo[b]fluorene were found in the Market Street sample, with values of 39 ppm and 33 [micro] g/g, respectively. Additional PAHs were detected in the Cortlandt and Cherry Street samples, although these samples had a much less diverse mix of additional PAHs and neither had detectable levels of the two compounds mentioned above. For example, the Cortlandt Street sample had two methylated phenanthrene compounds at concentrations < 10 [micro] g/g. If we add the quantifiable PAHs in each sample, the total PAHs in the settled dust and smoke was > 0.1% of the mass.

The highest concentrations of the 40 specific PAHs reported in Table 4 and Figure 7 were found in the Cortlandt Street sample. This is logical because it was the site closest to the fire after the collapse; however, a larger variety of other PAHs at concentrations > 10 [micro] g/g were found in the Market samples. The intense and uncontrolled fire(s) would be expected to burn at different temperatures, and the homogeneity of the material that burned would lead to a variety of unburned or partially burned hydrocarbons. These were derived from burning plastics, metals, woods, synthetic products, and other materials; using morphologic analyses, we found charred wood particles in all three samples.

Other organic compounds. A significant product of incomplete combustion found in all three samples was the class of contaminants called phthalate esters; as shown in Table 4, the levels were > 10 [micro] g/g for specific compounds. The total level of detectable phthalate esters in the Market Street sample was > 100 [micro] g/g. Hydrocarbons identified and shown in Figure 8 indicated the presence of a fuel, which in this case was associated with the approximately 91,000 L of unburned or burning jet fuel that cascaded down each building after the explosions and during the collapse of each tower. Results of all three samples showed an unresolved envelope of high boiling hydrocarbons of 10 carbons or greater and had individual compound peaks superimposed on the envelope (Figure 8). The mass spectrum of the unresolved envelope was consistent with saturated hydrocarbon chains (masses separated by 14 amu starting at 43 amu) and naphthalene ring structure (128 amu). All samples also showed major peaks of the lightest PAHs (naphthalene, substituted naphthalene, acenaphthalene, and fluorene), which were consistent with the presence of products of combustion and the quantitative results reported in Tables 3 and 4. The alkane peaks were much more pronounced and distinct in the sample collected farthest to the east of Ground Zero (0.7 km; Market Street) (Figure 8). The alkanes detected were the same as those found in uncombusted fuel. Jet fuel is composed of a mixture of saturated hydrocarbons (representing > 50% of the total fuel) and aromatic hydrocarbons (26). Paraffins and cycloparaffins in the C9-C16 range dominate the composition. Gas chromatograms of the vapor phase of jet fuel show both the unresolved envelope and individual hydrocarbon peaks of the straight chain pariffins observed in the thermal desorption profile from the collected dust sample (27). The additional peaks identified within the dust samples represent PAHs that resulted from the incomplete combustion of the building material, the jet fuel from the planes after the explosion and fire, and the collapse of both of the World Trade Center towers. The results suggest that particles transported away from the site during the initial conflagration contained a mixture of combustion products and jet fuel. Thus, residents downwind during the initial hours would have been exposed to particles from construction debris, products of incomplete combustion, and some coated with jet fuel. Other materials could have shown similar patterns, but the large amount of jet fuel released during the crashes would have overwhelmed contributions from other materials such as fuel oil and other petroleum-based products.

[FIGURE 8 OMITTED]

The levels of PCBs and polychlorinated dibenzo-p-diozins (PCDDs) and dibenzofurans (PCDFs) were in the nanograms per gram and picograms per gram range as shown in Tables 3 and 5, respectively. Thus, the situation yielded detectable, but not excessive, levels of these categories of environmental contaminants. The toxic equivalent values for PCDDs and PCDFs in dust (approximately 100 ng/kg) in this study were consistent with those of dust sampled directly from the pile (maximum total equivalents of about 300 ng/kg) (28). Neither our study nor the U.S. EPA found PCDD levels in dust above background (29). The levels of polybrominated biphenyls and brominated diphenyl ethers (BDEs) were also determined (Table 6) and were similar to levels found in sewage sludge (30). The penta-mixture (BDE-47, BDE-99, and BDE-100) is used in flame retardants for polyurethane foam, which is common as padding in office furniture. The highest concentration was for BDE-209, which is present in thermoplastics (e.g., computers). However, the large volume of material present would lead to significant ambient levels of polybrominated biphenyls, BDEs, and other materials during the first day after the attack on the WTC. We found no concentrations above background for the pesticide chlordane.

Discussion

The composition of each sample collected from the three locations east of the WTC site were complex because of the dual nature of the released aerosol and the magnitude of the event. The aerosol that was released and deposited on surfaces downwind of the complex included pulverized building debris and products of incomplete combustion produced by the explosion that ignited the thousands of liters of jet fuel. The mass of material deposited was extremely high and, in many indoor locations, the deposited particle loadings were 1-3 cm thick (Figure 9). In outdoor situations, the dust and smoke loadings sometimes reached a thickness of > 10 cm. Thus, on the first and second days after the attack on the WTC, > 70% of the mass was associated with construction materials, including pulverized cement, wallboard, and office furnishings, which included a large percentage by weight of glass fiber. A small percentage of the carcinogen asbestos was found in these samples ([approximately equal to] 0.8% by volume), although some individual samples yielded higher levels. The products of incomplete combustion were produced by the intense fire that consumed many materials in the buildings (e.g., furnishings, equipment, debris, wiring, metal, wood, etc.). PAHs, products of incomplete combustion, were present in the samples at levels of 5 [micro] g/g to hundreds of micrograms per gram. Concentrations of the individual compounds (e.g., benzo[a]pyrene) were > 20 [micro] g/g, and the total mass of PAHs present were in excess of 0.1% of the mass. When placed in the context of the vast amounts of other materials present in the air during the first day after the collapse and fires, these levels were high and could lead to significant short-term inhalation exposure. In fact, based on the PAH results obtained from air Samples after 25 September, the types of PAHs released into the atmosphere at that time were similar to the PAHs detected in the settled dust and smoke samples collected during the first week after the collapse and fires (29). The levels of PCDDs and PCDFs were similar to those found in other studies (29), but the levels of 2,2',4,4',5,5'-hexabromobiphenyl were higher than those found in sludge, which is likely due to its use during the construction of the WTC in the 1970s (30). The concentrations of lead ranged from 100 to > 600 ppm; these concentrations are not very high compared to the levels found in typical urban soils. However, the actual levels of dust and smoke deposited in individual buildings and businesses need to be assessed for cleanup based on the actual surface loading of lead and asbestos. A systematic effort will be required to properly clean indoor locations in order to eliminate persistent levels of lead, asbestos, and other hazardous materials on surfaces and in the air ducts that service each residence or building (air ducts can be a reservoir of material that could be released into the indoor air if not properly cleaned).

[FIGURE 9 OMITTED]

The high pH of the samples was probably caused by cement and other basic materials associated with construction debris in the deposited particles. This factor, along with the presence of long and thin glass fibers (nonasbestos) and attached agglomerated fine particles, must be considered when evaluating the initial lung irritations reported by residents and workers in the initial days and weeks after the collapse of the WTC buildings. The rain on 15 September and especially the heavy rains that fell on 24 September washed away much of the material from outdoor surfaces. However, because of the extremely dry weather pattern in the Northeast during fall 2001, dust still remained on some outdoor surfaces and rooftops through November. The WTC site itself was continually sprayed with water to keep the resuspendable dust levels down during recovery operations. The persistence of significant levels of the initial dust and smoke into the late fall were also associated with indoor locations, including buildings that had open ventilation systems or open windows at the time of the collapse, or had windows blown out during the collapse. The quantities of settled and resuspendable dust and smoke are of concern indoors. WTC dust and smoke could lead to health impacts if the toxic constituents present on the indoor surfaces are not cleaned properly and if the HVAC system of each structure is not concurrently cleaned, or cleaned before the cleanup of the indoor surfaces and reentry into the residence or office. The U.S. EPA and other organizations have repeatedly recommended using methods for removal of hazardous materials in residences and offices before rehabitation. This approach to cleanup is necessary to ensure that rehabitation clearance values are achieved for contaminants such as lead (i.e., 40 [micro] g/[ft.sup.2]] on floors) (31).

Some types of material that were released are similar to materials that we are exposed to during our daily lives. At a minimum, however, extraordinarily high quantities of coarse and fine particles were released and dispersed after the WTC collapse; future analysis is needed on the health consequences of the exposure among commuters, workers, and residents. The differences in the three samples that we analyzed suggest that there were inhomogenities among aerosol materials released on 11 September and during the subsequent weeks. This is expected because of the large amounts of different materials present in each of the collapsed and burning structures.

The outdoor cleanup of the initially deposited material began days after the attack and continued for several months. The indoor cleanup activities have proceeded more slowly. Eventually, estimates of human exposure to the materials characterized in these three bulk samples will be made. In addition, the results for composition and particle size, with and without agglomerates on glass fiber and other fibrous particles, will be used in assessments of short-term and long-term effects among various populations including sensitive subgroups. The people potentially exposed to the initially suspended dust and smoke, or subsequently settled dust and smoke, would include unprotected rescue workers, residents, and workers in downtown Manhattan immediately after and in the first few weeks after the collapse. The settled dust and smoke could be resuspended and expose unprotected residential cleanup workers and workers and residents in poorly or inefficiently cleaned buildings for weeks to months after 11 September. Finally, the levels of exposure encountered will have to be placed into context with the materials that have been released from the diminishing smoldering fires that continued to burn until 14 December 2001.

Conclusions

The analyses of the three settled dust samples collected from areas downwind of the collapsed WTC have provided information that is valuable in assessing exposures of workers and residents to related dusts. These exposures have occurred during resuspension of such dusts, both outdoors and indoors, in the course of rescue, cleanup, and routine day-to-day activities. The vast majority of the mass was pulverized building and construction materials including cement, cellulose, and glass fibers. However, the fires produced aerosol particles that contained products of incomplete combustion. Toxicants with significant concentrations or potential surface loadings included asbestos, glass fibers, lead, and PAHs. Further, many of these particles had much smaller particles agglomerated on the surface. The identification of these major components is important for assessing acute inhalation of resuspendable dust and smoke, or direct inhalation during the first week after the attack. Because the material also settled indoors, if indoor locations are not cleaned properly, there is a potential for long-term inhalation contact or ingestion contact.

The types of PAHs detected in these initial samples are similar to the PAHs detected in air samples 3 weeks after the attack. The fires continued at Ground Zero until 14 December 2001, resulting in the need for longer exposure characterization for products of incomplete combustion. The levels of dioxin and PCBs are similar to those found in the general environment.

Table 1. General characteristics of settled dust and smoke samples
(percent by mass) from the first days after the collapse and fires
of the WTC.

                                                Street
Sample                          Cortlandt       Cherry        Market

Color                          Pinkish gray  Pinkish gray  Pinkish gray

pH                                  11.5           9.2           9.3

Nonfiber
 (cement/carbon; %) (a)             50.0          49.2          37.0

Glass fiber (%) (a)                 40.0          40.0          40.0

Cellulose (%) (a)                    9.2          10.0          20.0

Chrysotile asbestos (%) (a)          0.8           0.8           3.0

Aerodynamically separated
  sample (% mass)
 < 2.5 [micro] m diameter           1.12          0.88          1.30
 2.5-10 [micro] m diameter          0.35          0.30          0.40
 10-53 [micro] m diameter          37.03         46.61         34.69
 > 53 [micro] m diameter           61.50         52.21         63.60

Sieved sample (% mass)
 < 75 [micro] m diameter           38.00         30.00         37.00
 75-300 [micro] m diameter         46.00         49.00         42.00
 > 300 [micro] m diameter          16.00         23.00         21.00

Anions/cations (ng/g)
 Fluoride                            220            70            ND
 Chloride                            800           270           220
 Nitrate                             330            ND            ND
 Sulfate                          41,400        35,200        42,100
 Calcium                          18,200        14,000        17,700
 Sodium                              400           200           130
 Potassium                            60           170           270

ND, not detectable.

(a) Values reported to L.C. Chen by the Ambient Group, TNC (New York,
NY), measured by polarized light microscopy (400-450x).
Table 2. Concentrations of elements (ng/g dry
weight) found in the three settled dust and smoke
samples.

                       Street
Element   Cortlandt    Cherry      Market

Li           26,800      22,650      29,520
Be            3,292       2,638       3,754
Mg          110,300     118,300     179,000
Al          814,700     558,800     908,700
Ti        1,717,000   1,485,000   1,797,000
V            40,370      33,890      42,610
Cr          182,000     142,600     171,500
Mn          781,400     565,100     828,100
Co            8,316       7,230      10,460
Ni           41,140      42,040      47,290
Cu          133,500     336,300     325,600
Zn        1,718,000   2,555,000   2,992,000
Ga           30,300      26,990      34,060
As            2,464       2,792       2,613
Rb           21,390      18,630      21,710
Sr          691,000     478,900     720,800
Ag            2,565       1,945       2,247
Cd            5,695       8,454       7,459
Cs            1,165       1,085       1,327
Ba          365,300     370,000     406,500
Hg             ND          ND          ND
TI              905       1,954       1,290
Pb          142,400     483,500     289,200
Bi            1,087       1,405       1,466
U             4,117       3,920       4,213
Table 3. Concentrations of pesticides, PCBs, and selected PAHs
(ng/g) found in the three settled dust and smoke samples.

                                             Street
Compound                         Cortlandt   Cherry    Market

Pesticides
 Hexachlorobenzene                    1.9        0.9       1.2
 Heptachlor                            ND         ND        ND
 4,4 DDE                              1.3        2.1       3.0
 2,4 BDT                               ND         NB        ND
 4,4 DDT                               ND         ND        ND
 Mirex                                 ND        0.8        ND
 Total chlordanes                     3.1        5.6       3.7

PCBs (a)
 Total PCBs (without 8 and 5)         631        562       723
 Total PCBs (with 8 and 5)            659        589       753

Selected PAHs
 Fluorene                           6,800      2,620    32,200
 Phenanthrene                      44,100     22,300    32,100
 Fluoranthrene                     40,300     13,700    32,600
 Benzo[a]pyrene                    23,000     12,100    19,300
 Benzo[b+k]fluoranthane            36,600     15,600    29,500
 Total PAHs (40 compounds) (b)    383,300    218,100   376,100

ND, not detected.

(a) PCB concentrations are the sum of 68 congeners (66 congeners
in the case of sum PCB without IUPAC congeners 5 and 8).

(b) Other compounds shown in Figure 7.
Table 4. Concentrations of semivolatile hydrocarbons ([micro] g/g)
found in the three dust and smoke samples (includes only compounds
>5 [micro] g/g in concentration).

Compound name                                   CAS No.

2-Hexyl-1-decanol                              2425-77-6
1-Dodecanol, 2-methyl-, (S)-                   57289-26-6
1H-1,2,4-Triazole, 1-ethyl                     16778-70-4
1H-Indene, 1-(phenylmethylene)-                    NA
1H-Pyrrole-3-propanoic acid, 2,5-dihydro-
 4-methyl-2, 5-dioxo                            487-65-0
1-Hexadecanol, 2-methyl                        2490-48-4
1-Hexyl-2-nitrocyclohexane                         NA
1-Hydroxypyrene                                5315-79-7
2,3-Dimethyl-1-pentanol,                       10143-23-4
1-Pentacontanol                                    NA
4-Methyl-2-propyl-1-pentanol                   54004-41-0
1,2,3-Triphenyl-3-vinyl-cyclopropene               NA
2-Benzylquinoline                              1745-77-3
2-Methylnaphthalene                             91-57-6
2,3-Dihydrofluoranthene                        30339-87-8
2-(3'-Hydroxyphenylamino)-5-methyl-4-
 oxo-3,4-dihydrophyrimidine                    57456-60-8
3-Methoxycarbonyl-2-methyl-5-(2,3,5-tri-
 O-acetyl-beta-d-ribofuranosyl)                   N/A
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine                          91-94-1
3,4-Dihydrocyclopenta(cd)pyrene (acepyrene)    25732-74-5
4-Hydroxymandelic acid-TRITMS                     N/A
7-Methyl-3,4,5(2H)-tetrahydroazepine              N/A
Benzo[c]fluorene                                205-12-9
9H-Fluorene, 9-(phenylmethylene)               4425-82-5
9,10-Anthraquinone                              84-65-1
11H-Benzo[a]fluorene                               NA
11H-Benzo[b]fluorene                               NA
12-Acetoxydaphnetoxin                              NA
1-Methylanthracene                              610-48-0
Auraptenol                                     61235-25-4
Benz[a]acridine, 10-methyl-                    3781-67-7
Benz[a]acridine                                 225-11-6
Benzamide, N-acetyl-                           1575-95-7
Benzene, 1,1'-(1,3-butadiyne-l,4-diyl)bis-      886-66-8
Benzimidazo [2,1-a] isoquinoline                239-44-1
Benzo[a]acridine                                225-11-6
Benzo[a]anthracene                              56-55-3
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
 (benz[e]acephenanthylene)                      205-99-2
Benzo[b]naphtho[2,3-d]furan                     243-42-5
Benzo[c]phenanthrene                            195-19-7
Benzo[h]quinoline                               230-27-3
Benzyl butyl phthalate                          85-68-7
Biphenyl                                        92-52-4
Carbazole                                       86-74-8
Dimethylcyanamide                              1467-79-4
Cyclohexanemethanol                             100-49-2
Cycloate                                       1134-23-2
Diisobutyl phthalate                            84-69-5
Di-n-butyl phthalate                            84-74-2
Dibenzofuran                                    132-64-9
Dibenzothiophene                                132-65-0
Dibutyl phthalate                               84-74-2
Dicyclohexyl phthalate                          84-61-7
Didodecyl phthalate                            2432-90-8
Diethyl phthalate                               84-66-2
Dihydregeraniol                                    NA
Droserone (2,8-dihydroxy-3-methyl-1,
 4-naphthoquinone)                                 NA
(E)-2-(6-Nonexnoxy)-tetrahydropyran            55305-36-7
Ether, hexyl pentyl                            32357-83-8
2,4-Dimethylheptane                            2213-23-2
2,3,4-Trimethylhexane                           921-47-1
2,4-Dimethylhexane                              589-43-5
3,3-Dimethylhexane                              563-16-6
Hexyl N-butyrate                               2639-63-6
Methyl alpha-ketopalmitate                         NA
Metribuzin                                     21087-64-9
Monobutyl phthalate                             131-70-4
n-Octane                                        111-65-9
Naphthalene, 1-(methylthio)-                   10075-72-6
Naphthalene, 1,3-dimethylene                    575-417
Nefopam                                        13669-70-0
Octane                                          111-65-9
Pentanoic acid, 4, 4-dimethyl-3methylene-,
 ethyl ester                                   36976-64-4
1-Methylphenanthrene                            832-69-9
4-Methylphenanthrene                            832-64-4
Phthalate                                          NA
Phthalic acid, 2-hexyl ester                       NA
Prometryn (caparol)                            7287-19-6
4,4'-Biphenyldicarbonitrile                    1591-30-6
Chrysene                                        218-01-9
1-Azabicyclo[2.2.2]octan-3-one                 3731-38-2
Vernolate (vernam)                             1929-77-7
Xanthene                                        92-83-1

                                                      Street
Compound name                                 Market  Cherry  Cortlandt

2-Hexyl-1-decanol                               ND      37.2      37.4
1-Dodecanol, 2-methyl-, (S)-                    ND      ND        6.8
1H-1,2,4-Triazole, 1-ethyl                      ND      12.1      ND
1H-Indene, 1-(phenylmethylene)-                 ND      ND        10.0
1H-Pyrrole-3-propanoic acid, 2,5-dihydro-
 4-methyl-2, 5-dioxo                            9.0     ND        ND
1-Hexadecanol, 2-methyl                         ND      19.7      ND
1-Hexyl-2-nitrocyclohexane                      27.0    ND        ND
1-Hydroxypyrene                                 14.4    ND        ND
2,3-Dimethyl-1-pentanol,                        20.4    ND        ND
1-Pentacontanol                                 ND      ND        27.7
4-Methyl-2-propyl-1-pentanol                    ND      ND        27.5
1,2,3-Triphenyl-3-vinyl-cyclopropene            ND      ND        24.5
2-Benzylquinoline                               ND      ND        18.8
2-Methylnaphthalene                             ND      ND        5.1
2,3-Dihydrofluoranthene                         13.4    ND        ND
2-(3'-Hydroxyphenylamino)-5-methyl-4-
 oxo-3,4-dihydrophyrimidine                     ND      ND        41.4
3-Methoxycarbonyl-2-methyl-5-(2,3,5-tri-
 O-acetyl-beta-d-ribofuranosyl)                 32.1    ND        ND
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine                          10.0    ND        ND
3,4-Dihydrocyclopenta(cd)pyrene (acepyrene)     35.5    ND        ND
4-Hydroxymandelic acid-TRITMS                   26.8    ND        ND
7-Methyl-3,4,5(2H)-tetrahydroazepine            ND      ND        18.5
Benzo[c]fluorene                                39.4    ND        ND
9H-Fluorene, 9-(phenylmethylene)                13.8    ND        ND
9,10-Anthraquinone                              21.4    ND        11.5
11H-Benzo[a]fluorene                            19.6    ND        ND
11H-Benzo[b]fluorene                            33.3    ND        ND
12-Acetoxydaphnetoxin                           ND      ND        8.0
1-Methylanthracene                              8.9     ND        ND
Auraptenol                                      ND      ND        13.5
Benz[a]acridine, 10-methyl-                     ND      ND        7.2
Benz[a]acridine                                 ND      12.4      ND
Benzamide, N-acetyl-                            ND      ND        22.9
Benzene, 1,1'-(1,3-butadiyne-l,4-diyl)bis-      79.8    ND        ND
Benzimidazo [2,1-a] isoquinoline                ND      17.3      ND
Benzo[a]acridine                                9.3     ND        ND
Benzo[a]anthracene                              61.0    ND        ND
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
 (benz[e]acephenanthylene)                      49.9    ND        ND
Benzo[b]naphtho[2,3-d]furan                     ND      ND        28.2
Benzo[c]phenanthrene                            ND      ND        43.7
Benzo[h]quinoline                               ND      ND        5.9
Benzyl butyl phthalate                          ND      ND        94.1
Biphenyl                                        6.5     ND        ND
Carbazole                                       28.6    8.1       22.1
Dimethylcyanamide                               ND      ND        14.4
Cyclohexanemethanol                             ND      ND        16.8
Cycloate                                        ND      32.4      46.0
Diisobutyl phthalate                            27.5    ND        ND
Di-n-butyl phthalate                            12.6    ND        ND
Dibenzofuran                                    14.5    ND        9.2
Dibenzothiophene                                ND      ND        12.7
Dibutyl phthalate                               16.5    14.6      19.7
Dicyclohexyl phthalate                          ND      77.8      ND
Didodecyl phthalate                             80.0    ND        ND
Diethyl phthalate                               31.7    ND        ND
Dihydregeraniol                                 51.4    ND        ND
Droserone (2,8-dihydroxy-3-methyl-1,
 4-naphthoquinone)                              9.8     ND        ND
(E)-2-(6-Nonexnoxy)-tetrahydropyran             14.5    ND        ND
Ether, hexyl pentyl                             31.6    31.3      ND
2,4-Dimethylheptane                             ND      28.5      ND
2,3,4-Trimethylhexane                           12.2    15.6      12.7
2,4-Dimethylhexane                              ND      ND        13-3
3,3-Dimethylhexane                              ND      14.1      30.8
Hexyl N-butyrate                                ND      ND        8.0
Methyl alpha-ketopalmitate                      ND      ND        37.3
Metribuzin                                      22.1    ND        ND
Monobutyl phthalate                             ND      ND        62.4
n-Octane                                        43.3    ND        ND
Naphthalene, 1-(methylthio)-                    ND      ND        7.5
Naphthalene, 1,3-dimethylene                    5.3     ND        ND
Nefopam                                         10.2    ND        ND
Octane                                          ND      6.9       ND
Pentanoic acid, 4, 4-dimethyl-3methylene-,
 ethyl ester                                    ND      19.5      ND
1-Methylphenanthrene                            ND      ND        10.5
4-Methylphenanthrene                            ND      ND        12.9
Phthalate                                       ND      6.9       ND
Phthalic acid, 2-hexyl ester                    ND      47.9      ND
Prometryn (caparol)                             10.7    ND        ND
4,4'-Biphenyldicarbonitrile                     ND      ND        19.6
Chrysene                                        ND      18.2      ND
1-Azabicyclo[2.2.2]octan-3-one                  ND      12.3      ND
Vernolate (vernam)                              ND      ND        14.9
Xanthene                                        9.5     ND        ND

Abbreviations: NA, not available; ND, not detected. The 40 PAHs shown
in Figure 7 are not included.
Table 5. Concentrations (ng/kg) of PCDDs and PCDFs in the three
settled dust samples.

                                                Street

Compound                             Cortlandt   Market   Cherry

PCDDs
 2,3,7,8-TCDD                          7.00       5.81     6.53
 1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDD                    29.4       6.01     7.05
 1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDD                   32.2       4.93     4.95
 1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDD                   35.0       16.6     18.0
 1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDD                   38.5       19.0     18.8
 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDD                158        304      325
 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDD              1,450       3,630    3,410
PCDFs
 2,3,7,8-TetraCDF                      78.2       194      221
 1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDF                    40.3       39.4     42.7
 2,3,4,7,8-PentaCDF                    54.5       77.3     85.0
 1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDF                   57.4       46.0     46.4
 1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDF                   46.1       46.0     48.0
 1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDF                   28.7       24.4     4.95
 2,3,4,6,7,8-HexaCDF                   39.5       37.0     37.9
 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDF                91.6       171      177
 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HeptaCDF                40.1       32       31.1
 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDF               118        171      182
 2,3,7,8-Dioxin total equivalents      104        96.1     103
Table 6. Concentrations of some brominated flame retardants
detected in the dust and smoke released by the collapse of the
WTC ([micro] g/kg, dry weight basis).

                                          BDE154 +
Street      BDE47  BDE100  BDE99  BDE153   PBB153   BDE209

Cherry       146    74.1     243   45.9      219     1,330
Cortlandt    107    64.2     155   42.0      305     2,660
Market       174    51.1     293   53.4      243     2,330

Abbreviations: BDE47, 2,2',4,4'-tetrabromodiphenyl ether; BDE99,
2,2',4,4',5-pentabromodiphenyl ether; BDE100, 2',4,4',
6-pentabromodiphenyl ether; BDE153, 2,2'4,4',5,5'-hexabromodiphenyl
ether; BDE154, 2,2',4,4',5,8-hexabromodiphenyl ether; BDE209, 2,2',
3,3',4,4',5,5',8,8'-hexabromodiphenyl ether; PBB153, 2,2'4,4'5,
5'-hexabromobiphenyl.

REFERENCES AND NOTES

(1.) Claudio L. Environmental aftermath. Environ Health Perspect 109:A528-A537 (2001).

(2.) Kitsa V, Lioy PJ, Chow JC, Watson JG, Shupack S, Howell T, Sanders P. Particle size distribution of chromium--total and hexavalent chromium in inspirable and respirable soil particles from contaminated sites in New Jersey. Aerosol Sci Technol 17:213-229 (1992).

(3.) Pellizzari E, Lioy PJ, Quackenboss J, Whitmore R, Clayton A, Freeman N, Waldman J, Thomas K, Rodes C, Wilcosky T. The design and implementation of phase I national human exposure assessment study in EPA Region V. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 5:327-358 (1995).

(4.) Millette JR, Hopen TJ. Characterizing household dirt. In: Proceedings of the Second NSF International Conference on Indoor Air Health, 29-31 January 2001, Miami, FL. Ann Arbor, MI:NSF International, 2001;174-183.

(5.) Lioy PJ, Freeman NCG, Millette JR. Dust: a metric for use in residential and building exposure assessment, and source characterization. Environ Health Perspect (in press).

(6.) ASTM. Standard Practice for Sampling and Testing of Possible Carbon Black Fugitive Emissions or Other Environmental Particulate, or Both. ASTM D6602-00. West Conshohocken, PA:American Society for Testing and Materials, 2001.

(7.) Behrens JW. A Guide for the Microscopial Investigation of Vegetable Substances. Boston, MA:SE Cassino and Co, 1985.

(8.) Kerr PF. Optical Mineralogy. 4th ed. New York:McGraw Hill, 1977.

(9.) McCrone WC, Dolly JG. The Particle Atlas. 2nd ed. Ann Harbor, MI:Ann Arbor Science Publishers, 1973.

(10.) Gard JA. The Electron-Optical Investigation of Clays. Mineralogical Society, Monograph 3. London:Mineralogical Society, 1971.

(11.) Basu S, Millette JR, eds. Electron Microscopy in Forensic, Occupational, and Environmental Health Sciences, New York:Plenum Press, 1986.

(12.) Blando JD, Porcia RJ, Li T-H, Bowman D, Lioy PJ, Turpin, BJ. Secondary formation and Smokey Mountain organic aerosol: an examination of aerosol polarity and functional group composition during SEAVS. Environ Sci Technol 32:604-613 (1998).

(13.) Offenberg JH, Baker JE. Aerosol size distributions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban and over-water atmospheres. Environ Sci Technol 33:3324-3331 (1999).

(14.) Brunciak PA, Dachs J, Gigliotti CL, Nelson ED, Eisenreich SJ. Atmospheric polychlorinated biphenyl concentrations and apparent degradation in coastal New Jersey. Atmos Environ 35:3325-3339 (2001).

(15.) Wise SA, Schantz MM, Hays MJ, Koster BJ, Sharpless KS, Sander LC, Benner BA, Schiller SB. Certification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in mussel tissue and air particulate--Standard Reference Materials (SRMs). Ploycyclic Aromatic Compounds 9:209-218 (1996).

(16.) Haffer M, Yang I, Buckley B. GC/Ion trap mass spectrometry for semi-volatile organics monitoring in drinking water sources, fish tissue and sediments, same instrument different songs. In: Book of Abstracts Presented at PITTCON 1999, 7-12 March 1999, Orlando, FL. Pittsburgh:Pittsburgh Conference, 1999;999.

(17.) Haffer M, Yang I, Cashman K, Buckley B. An improved microwave extraction method for the analysis of semi-volatile organic compounds extracted from soils and sediments using GC/ITMS and GC/ITMSMS. In: Book of Abstracts Presented at PITTCON 2000, March 12-17, 2000, New Orleans, LA. Pittsburgh:Pittsburgh Conference, 2000;1255.

(18.) U.S. EPA Method 1613. Tetra- Through octa-Chlorinated Dioxins and Furans by Isotope Dilution HRGC/HRMS (Rev. B). Washington, DC:U.S. EPA, Office of Water, Engineering and Analysis Division, 1994.

(19.) U.S. EPA. RCRA SW846 Method 8290. Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins (PCDDs) and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans (PCDFs) by High Resolution Gas Chromatograph/High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRGC/HRMS). Washington, DC:U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste, 1994.

(20.) Hale RC, LaGuardia MJ, Harvey EP, Mainor TM, Duff WH, Gaylor MO. Polybrominated dipenyl ether flame retardants in Virginia freshwater fishes (USA). Environ Sci Technol 35:4585-4591 (2001).

(21.) Gyntelberg F, Suadincani P, Nielson JW, Skov P. Dust and the sick building syndrome. Indoor Air 4(4):223-238 (1994).

(22.) Millette JR. Early studies characterizing household dirt. Microscope 49(4):201-208 (2001).

(23.) Molhave L, Schneider T, Kjaergaard SK, Larsen L, Norn S, Jorgensen O. House dust in seven Danish offices. Atmos Environ 34:4767-4779 (2000).

(24.) Lioy PJ, Yiin LM, Adgate J, Weisel C, Rhoads GG. The effectiveness of home cleaning intervention strategy in reducing potential dust and lead exposures. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 8:17-35 (1998).

(25.) Lioy PJ. Measurement methods for human exposure analysis. Environ Health Perspect 103(suppl 3):35-43 (1995).

(26.) ATSDR. Toxicological Profile for Jet Fuels (JP-5 and JP-8). Atlanta, GA:Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1998.

(27.) Pleil JD, Smith LB, Zelnick SD. Personal exposure to JP-8 jet fuel vapors and exhaust at Air Force bases. Environ Health Perspect 108:183-192 (2000).

(28.) Vette A, Landis M, Webb L, Vallero D. Personal communication.

(29.) Swartz E, Stockbeorger L, Vallero D. Preliminary Data of Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Other Semivolatile Organic Compounds Collected in New York City in Response to the Events of September 11, 2001. Research Triangle Park, NC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Laboratory, 2001.

(30.) Hale RC, LaGuardia M J, Harvey E, Gaylor MO, Mainor TM, Duff WH. Flame retardants: persistent pollutants in land-applied sludges. Nature 412:141-142 (2001).

(31.) US. Environmental Protection Agency. Lead; Identification of Dangerous Levels of Lead; Final Rule. Fed Reg 66:1206-1240 (2001).

Address correspondence to P.J. Lioy, Exposure Measurement and Assessment Division, Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, 170 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8020 USA. Telephone: [phone]. Fax: [phone]. E-mail: [e-mail]

We thank D. Bates and his analytic team in the U.S. EPA's Kansas City Regional Laboratory for their analysis of the dust for dioxins and furans. We also thank C. Schopfer of the Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute (EOHSI) for completion of the radionuclide analyses; R. Harrington for analytic support, and M.J. La Guardia of the Virginia Institute of Marine Science for technical assistance. We extend our gratitude to D. Owuor for assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. Finally, we express our deepest sympathy and continuing concern for the families of the victims, and survivors of 11 September 2001.

This work was funded in part by supplemental funds from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) to the NIEHS Centers at EOHSI (ES05022-12) and the NYU Institute of Medicine (ES00260). NYU is also funded in part by a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) PM Center Grant (R827351), P.J. Lioy was also supported in part by a U.S. EPA University Partnership (CR827033).

This work has been subjected to agency review and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendations for use.

Received 15 January 2002; accepted 8 April 2002.

Paul J. Lioy, (1,2) Clifford P. Weisel, (1,2) James R. Millette, (3) Steven Eisenreich, (1,4) Daniel Vallero, (5) John Offenberg, (4) Brian Buckley, (1) Barbara Turpin, (1,4) Mianhua Zhong, (6) Mitchell D. Cohen, (6) Colette Prophete, (6) III Yang, (1) Robert Stiles, (1) Glen Chee, (6) Willie Johnson, (1) Robert Porcja, (1,4) Shahnaz Alimokhtari, (1) Robert C. Hale, (7) Charles Weschler, (1) and Lung Chi Chen (6)

(1) Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute of New Jersey, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA; (2) Department of Environmental and Community Medicine, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA; (3) MVA, Norcross, Georgia; (4) Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA; (5) National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA; (6) Nelson Institute of Environmental Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; (7) Department of Environmental Sciences, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Gloucester, Virginia, USA