Printer Friendly
The Free Library
23,375,127 articles and books


Characterization of photocurable coatings using fluorescence probes.

INTRODUCTION

Radiation curing technology has found widespread industrial applications owing to its high speed, efficiency, and solvent-free nature. Photocurable polymers are used in the formulation of various commercial products such as coatings, adhesives, inks, and sealants (1). In all of these applications, a photocuring process is used to convert multifunctional monomers such as acrylics into crosslinked polymer networks. The ultimate chemical and physical properties of these polymeric materials depend on various factors, such as monomer structure, forms of initiation, reaction conditions, and the rate and degree of polymerization. Thus, a thorough understanding of the photocuring process is essential for property control and processing optimization of the final products.

Characterization of the crosslinked polymer networks is still a challenging task, although significant progress has been made. Several methods have been developed to study the kinetics of photopolymerization. Among them are photo-differential scanning calorimetry (PDSC)(2-5), laser interferometry (6), photo-acoustic spectroscopy (7), and UV and FTIR spectroscopy (8-10). PDSC is basically like a modified DSC, with a Hg lamp source mounted next to the sample. It has been extensively used to study the kinetics of photopolymerization and the degree of cure can also be measured. However, PDSC is not useful for real time cure monitoring and non-destructive analysis of photopolymers. FTIR is widely used to determine the degree of photopolymerization by monitoring the concentration of residual monomers present in various polymer systems. A real time infrared (RTIR) technique developed by Decker et al. (8-9), allows one to monitor the polymerization process continuously and rapidly in real time. Both the rate and degree of polymerization can be measured. However, IR techniques can only be used to analyze thin films (less than 20 [[micro]meter] thick). Besides that, transmission IR techniques cannot be used to monitor the degree of polymerization of coatings on opaque substrates. Also, they are not useful for monitoring polymerization of bulk materials, such as parts made by stereo-lithography (11).

Fluorescence spectroscopy has gained considerable interest as an analytical tool for polymer cure characterization because of its high sensitivity, selectivity, and nondestructive characteristics (12-18). Remote sensing is readily achieved by using fiber-optic cables to transmit optical signals to and from a polymerization system in real time. Recently, Neckers et al. (13-16) reported the successful use of fluorescence probes to monitor the photocuring process of polyolacrylate monomers. Two types of fluorescence probes were found to be particularly useful. The first were based on "excimer" (i.e. excited dimer) forming molecules, such as pyrene or its derivatives (17). The ratio of the emission intensities of the monomer and excimer was found to correlate well with the degree of cure. The second were based on intramolecular charge transfer molecules, such as 4-(N, N-dimethylamino)benzonitrile (DMABN), and dansyl amide and its derivatives. DMABN exhibits dual fluorescence corresponding to two different single excited states (18). The short wavelength ([b.sup.*]) band is due to a coplanar (parallel) excited state conformation while the long wavelength ([a.sup.*]) band originates from a perpendicular conformation, which is the so-called twisted intramolecular charge transfer (TICT) state. The coplanar conformation is more stable in the ground state because of a higher degree of delocalization of the [Pi] orbitals. Therefore, the coplanar excited state will be directly populated from the ground state. However, the perpendicular excited state is energetically more stable owing to a large charge separation. This implies that the molecules are first excited to the [b.sup.*] conformation and then "cross" or relax to the [a.sup.*] conformation, making the population of the perpendicular conformation strongly dependent upon the microenvironment of the TICT molecule. In fact, fluorescence spectra of TICT probes were found to be very sensitive to changes in the microviscosity of the medium (13-16). In particular, the ratio of the emission intensities at two different emission wavelengths can be correlated linearly with the degree of cure for various polyolacrylate monomer systems.

In this paper, we present the results of our recent study on using 5-dimethylaminonaphthalene-1-sulfonyl-n-butylamide (DASB) and 6-propionyl-2-(dimethylamino)naphthalene (PRODAN) (see Chart I) as fluorescence probes for characterization of a variety of photopolymerized acrylic and unsaturated polyester resins obtained, mainly, from commercial suppliers. The resin systems were chosen as representatives of diverse applications in the photo cure industry. Our results indicate the technique to be both versatile and generally applicable in a variety of photocurable systems.

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Materials

5-Dimethylaminonaphthalene-1-sulfonyl-n-butylamide (DASB) was synthesized from the reaction of 5-dimethylaminonaphthalene-1-sulfonyl chloride (DASC) with an excess of n-butylamine in THF. In a typical procedure, 2.7 g (0.01 mole) DASC (Kodak) was first dissolved in 20 ml anhydrous THF and 5 ml n-butylamine was added. After stirring at room temperature overnight, the reaction mixture was taken to dryness using a rotavapor. The residue was then dissolved in 20 ml dichloromethane and 20 ml distilled water was added with a few drops of concentrated HCl. The organic phase containing the product was then extracted and dried. The residue was dissolved in a little ethanol and on addition of water, DASB crystallized. The product was recrystallized from ethanol-water (50/50 vol%. 1H-NMR (CD[Cl.sub.3]), [Delta], ppm: 0.75 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.11-1.42 (4H, m), 2.83-2.93 (8H, overlapping s, m), 4.55 (1H, t, J = 6.3 Hz), 7.19 (1H, d, J = 7.4 Hz), 7.55 (2H, m), 8.27 (2H, m), 8.55 (1H, d, J = 8.6 Hz). m.p. = 92 [degrees] C, mass spectrum m/e = 306. PRODAN was purchased from Molecular Probes, Inc., and used without further purification.

A mixture of multifunctional acrylates was made by mixing polyethylene glycol-400 diacrylate, PEGA-400 (Monomer-Polymer and Dajac Labs, Inc.), trimethylolpropane triacrylate (TMPTA) (Saret 351, from the Sartomer Co.), and dipentaerythrytol monohydroxy pentaacrylate (DPHPA) (Sartomer 399, from the Sartomer Chemical Co.), in a weight percentage ratio of 20/40/40, respectively. A fluorone dye, 2,4-diiodo-6-butoxy-3-fluorone, DIBF, developed in our group(19), was utilized as the visible (VIS) initiator at a concentration of [approximately]5 x [10.sup.-4] M. Amine coinitiators, either N-phenyl glycine, NPG (Aldrich), or N,N[prime]-dimethylamino-2,6-diisopropylaniline (DIDMA) (Aldrich), were used at a concentration of [approximately]5 x [10.sup.-2] M. The coinitiator in this case acts as an electron donor to the excited state of the dye, before the generation of free radicals (19).

To photocure commercial unsaturated polyester or polyester acrylate resins, 2,4-diiodo-6-butoxy-3-fluorone (DIBF) was utilized as the visible initiator at a concentration of 0.10 or 0.15 wt%. The coinitiator system was composed of an onium salt, 4-octyloxylphenyliodonium hexafiuoroantimonate (OPPI), and an amine, N,N[prime]-dimethylamino-2,6-diisopropylaniline, (DIDMA). The molar ratio of DIBF/OPPI/DIDMA is 1/2/3. A typical formulation of the photocurable system consists 10 g of an as-received resin, 10 mg DIBF, 24.8 mg OPPI, 11.8 mg DIDMA, and 1.0 mg DASB. The mixture was mixed thoroughly before the photocuring process.

Several types of commercial UV-curable acrylated coatings were investigated. These included two fiber-optic coating formulations including a primary coating (Desotech 950-076, from DSM) and a secondary coating (Desolite 950-044, from DSM), a polyester acrylate floor coating formulation (Duracote, from Armstrong World Industries), two acrylic coating formulations for vinyl sheets (Durethane R602Z70 and R509Z70, from PPG Industries), a silicone acrylate (UV8550-D1, from GE Silicones), and an unsaturated polyester resin (from Owens-Corning Fiberglas). The fluorescence probe, DASB or PRODAN, was mixed into the photocurable monomer solutions to be studied at a concentration of about 1-5 x [10.sup.-4] M/L.

Cure Monitoring Procedure

The photocuring process was carried out using either a medium pressure Hg arc lamp or a 75 W Tungsten-Halogen bulb. The degree of polymerization for different samples was varied by changing the exposure time. A few drops of monomer solution were first squeezed between two pieces of glass slides (or NaCl plates for IR measurements) with spacers of appropriate thicknesses at the edges to control the final thickness. Steady state fluorescence emission spectra of samples cured for different periods of time were obtained via a Spex Fluorolog-2 spectrophotometer. Remote measurement was carried out using a bifurcated fiber-optic cable attached to the excitation and emission monochromators, respectively.

Infrared measurement of the extent of double bond conversion was accomplished using a Mattson Galaxy Series 6020 FT-IR spectrometer with a spectral resolution of 2 [cm.sup.-1]. The extent of C??C conversion ([Alpha]) was calculated using the following equation:

[Alpha] = 1 - [A.sub.acry](t) * [A.sub.ref](0)/[A.sub.acry](0) * [A.sub.ref](t) (1)

where [A.sub.acry](t) and [A.sub.acry](0) are the absorbances at 810 [cm.sup.-1] due to the acrylate double bond, after curing times t and zero, respectively. [A.sub.ref](t) and [A.sub.ref](0) are the reference peak absorbances at 2945 [cm.sup.-1] due to the CH groups, after curing times t and zero, respectively. This reference peak was used as an internal standard to calibrate any thickness fluctuation during the curing process.

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis was accomplished using a Perkin-Elmer DSC-4 thermal analyzer with a Model 3600 data station. The heat of reactions of resin samples (15-20 mg) photocured for various periods of times were determined by dynamic DSC scanning (heating rate = 20 [degrees] C) using stainless steel pans under a constant purging of dry [N.sub.2]. The degree of cure ([Alpha]) was calculated using the following equation.

[Alpha] = 1 - [Delta][H.sub.residue]/[Delta][H.sub.total] (2)

where [[Delta][H.sub.residue] is the residual heat of reaction measured for the sample after curing for a period of time. [Delta][H.sub.total] is the total heat of reaction obtained when benzoyl peroxide (1.0 wt%) was used as the thermal initiator.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Fluorescence Probe Study

It is known that aromatic amines possessing a strong donor and acceptor substituent often exhibit intramolecular charge transfer properties with a large Stokes shift or dual fluorescence. DASB is a highly fluorescing compound with a large Stokes shift (152 nm in THF). Figure 1 shows the fluorescence excitation and emission spectra of DASB in THF. The excitation and emission maxima were found to be at 342 and 494 nm, respectively. Its fluorescence quantum yield ([[Phi].sub.f]) was measured to be about 0.5 in THF solution using 9,10-diphenylanthracene as the standard. These distinct fluorescence characteristics of DASB have been employed to detect trace amounts of amines and amino acids in liquid chromatography (22). Okamoto et al. (21) reported a kinetic study on the reaction of fluorescent reagent, 5-dimethylaminonaphthalene-1-sulphonyl chloride (DASC) with n-butyl amines by monitoring the fluorescence emission of the product, DASB, in various nonaqueous solvents. The reaction was found to proceed quantitatively by simple second-order kinetics with rate constants of the order [10.sup.-3] to [10.sup.-1] [m.sup.-1] [s.sup.-1] at the temperature of 30 [degrees] to 50 [degrees] C. For polymer cure monitoring applications, the high fluorescence quantum yield and large Stokes shift of the DASB probe is advantageous. Since spectral blue shifts in the ICT probe fluorescence emission are often observed as the matrix viscosity increases during a curing process, a larger separation between the absorption and emission peaks offer a wider spectrum window and the intrinsic fluorescence from the photopolymer (if any) would be less prone to interfere with the probe fluorescence signals.

PRODAN, 6-propionyl-2-(dimethylamino)naphthalene, was first synthesized by Weber and Farris as a hydrophobic fluorescence probe (22). Its fluorescence emission spectrum exhibits a remarkably large red-shift as the solvent polarity increases, due to the formation of charge transfer (CT) state in polar solvents. Studies of the pressure effects on the fluorescence properties of PRODAN by Rollinson and Drickamer (23) showed that the shorter wavelength fluorescence in nonpolar media was attributed to a locally excited (LE) state and the longer wavelength fluorescence in polar media to the formation of a twisted excited conformer. Heisel et al. (24) studied the fluorescence decays and the time-resolved spectra of PRODAN in n-butanol at low temperatures and confirmed the existence of an energetically lower charge transfer excited state due to polar solute-solvent interactions. It was found that the fluorescence emission peak position of PRODAN in n-butanol shifted to shorter wavelengths on decreasing the temperature. This indicates that the fluorescence peak position of PRODAN is viscosity dependent. As the matrix viscosity increases, the difficulty for an excited PRODAN molecule to relax to its lowest charge transfer state increases, thus leading to a blue shift in the fluorescence emission spectra.

Figure 2 compares the fluorescence emission spectra ([[Lambda].sub.ex] = 380 nm) of DASB in a commercial acrylate coating formulation (Desotech 950-076, used as a primary coating for fibers) before (0% C = C conversion) and after curing for 30 sec ([approximately]95% C = C conversion) using a medium pressure Hg lamp. A total spectral blue shift of [approximately]20 nm was obtained. This spectral blue shift was due to increases in the medium viscosity, which makes it more difficult to form the long wavelength twisted conformation in the excited state. A total spectral blue shift of about 14 nm was observed when PRODAN was used as the fluorescence probe in the same resin formulation. To follow the changes in the probe emission spectra, we used a fluorescence intensity ratio method in which fluorescence intensity values at two different wavelengths (R = I[parallel]/I[perpendicular to]) were monitored. I[parallel] and I[perpendicular to] represent the fluorescence emission intensity values corresponding to the parallel and perpendicular conformations, respectively, in the excited states of the probe. The ratio method produces an internal calibration for any changes in sample thickness and lamp intensity during the cure monitoring process. Linear correlations between the extent of double bond conversion vs. the probe fluorescence intensity ratio were obtained when both probes were used to monitor the photocuring process of acrylic fiber coating, as shown in Fig. 3. However, DASB is advantageous because it is less expensive than PRODAN.

Cure Monitoring of UV-Curable Acrylic Coatings

Acrylic Coatings for Optical Fibers

UV curable acrylic coatings are applied to optical fibers for protection purposes. Generally, two types of coatings are used: a primary coating usually with a more flexible and soft structure such as those of ali-phatic urethane acrylates; and a harder secondary coating containing photocurable acrylic monomers like aromatic epoxy acrylates to provide the necessary mechanical strength. Figure 4 compares the changes in the extent of double bond conversion as a function of irradiation time under a medium pressure Hg lamp for the two fiber coating formulations studied. We can see that the initial cure rate of the primary coating is significantly slower than that of the secondary coating. An induction time of about 2 s was observed for the primary coating while that of secondary coating was less than one tenth of a second. However, the overall extent of cure of the primary coating ([approximately]95%) was much higher than that of secondary coating ([approximately]60%). This is probably due to the difference in cure rate. A faster cure rate in the secondary coating formulation can result in a rapid increase in the crosslinking density, which in turn makes it difficult for the propagating radicals to diffuse to the unreacted acrylate functional groups to continue the polymerization process, thus a lower extent of cure is observed. Results of the fluorescence probe (DASB) studies of the photocuring processes of the two coating formulations correlates well with the FTIR results. The probe fluorescence ratio, R = [I.sub.470]/[I.sub.560], increases linearly with the extent of double bond conversion for the both fiber coating formulations as shown in Fig. 5. Therefore, the DASB probe can be used to monitor the photocuring processes of acrylic coatings for optical fibers.

Acrylic Coatings for Plastics

UV curable acrylic resins are widely used as coatings on plastic materials such as polystyrene, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). To demonstrate the applicability of the fluorescent probe technique, we doped the DASB probe into two types of acrylic coating formulations: an alpha gloss Durethane coating (from PPG Industries) and a low gloss coating also from the PPG. The Durethane coating formulations contain mainly 2-ethylhexyl acrylate monomer with a UV initiator (benzophenone/amine). DASB was readily dissolved into both coating formulations at a concentration of 0.016 wt% before the photocuring process. Figure 6 compares the fluorescence and FTIR cure monitoring profiles of the alpha gloss Durethane resin as a function of the irradiation time using a medium pressure mercury lamp. It can be seen that the two cure profiles are very similar as the probe fluorescence ratio increases from [approximately]1.5 (0% C = C conversion) to [approximately]3.7 ([approximately]90% C = C conversion) after photocuring for 60 s. Figure 7a demonstrates a linear correlation between the probe fluorescence ratio ([I.sub.470]/[I.sub.560]) and the extent of C = C conversion. Although the low gloss UV curable coating formulation was found to have a faster cure rate than the alpha gloss coating formulation, a linear correlation curve between the fluorescence probe response ([I.sub.470]/[I.sub.560]) and the extent of C = C conversion was obtained as shown in Fig. 7b.

Silicone acrylate is another important class of photocurable resin for coating applications. In a similar manner, we examined the applicability of the DASB probe for cure monitoring of a commercial UV-curable silicone acrylate resin obtained from GE Silicones. The fluorescence ratio ([I.sub.470]/[I.sub.560]) was found to increase from [approximately]1.4 (0% C = C conversion) to [approximately]4.8 (68% C = C conversion) after curing for about 5 min under a medium pressure mercury lamp. A linear correlation curve between the fluorescence ratio ([I.sub.470]/[I.sub.560]) and the extent of double bond conversion was obtained as shown in Fig. 8. It is noted that the total change in fluorescence ratio of the silicone acrylate resin before and after curing is significantly larger than other UV curable resins (Table 1). These differences in the slopes of the correlation curves may reflect some useful structural information such as the crosslinking density of photopolymerized acrylated polymer networks. An ICT probe in a high crosslinking density polymer matrix is expected to give a larger value of the fluorescence intensity ratio than that in a low crosslinking density polymer matrix, even though their degrees of polymerization are the same. Future work in this area will certainly lead to some interesting findings.
Table 1. Slopes and Intercepts of the Correlation Curves Between the
Probe Fluorescence Intensity Ratio and the Degree of Cure for
Different Photocurable Resins using DASB as the Fluorescence Probe.


Resin System Intercept Slope


Acrylic Coating for Fibers (Primary)(1) 1.38 2.63
Acrylic Coating for Fibers (Secondary)(2) 1.63 2.32
Acrylic Coating for Vinyls (Alpha Gloss)(3) 1.45 2.65
Acrylic Coating for Vinyls (Low Gloss)(4) 1.24 2.71
Silicone Acrylate(5) 1.34 4.82
Multifunctional Acrylate(6) 1.12 3.39
Polyester Acrylate(7) 0.902 2.75
Unsaturated Polyester(8) 0.0043 0.475


1 A UV curable acrylic formulation (Desotech 950-076) from DSM
Desotech Inc., Elgin, III.


2 A UV curable acrylic formulation (Desolite 950-044) from DSM
Desotech Inc., Elgin, III.


3 A UV curable acrylic formulation (Alpha gloss Durethane) from PPG
Industries, Inc., Allison Park, Pa.


4 A UV curable acrylic formulation (Low gloss Durethane) from PPG
Industries, Inc., Allison Park, Pa.


5 A UV curable silicone acrylic formulation from GE Silicones,
Waterford, N.Y.


6 This polyester acrylate coating (Duracoat) is from the Armstrong
World Ind., Lancaster, Pa. The visible initiator system used
consists 2,4-diiodo-6-butoxy-3-fluorone (DIBF),
4-octyloxyphenyliodonium hexafluoroantimonate (OPPI), and
N,N[prime]-dimethylamino-2,6-diisopropylaniline (DIDMA) with a molar
ratio of DIBF/OPPI/DIDMA = 1/2/3. The concentration of DIBF is 0.01
wt%.


7 The multifunctional acrylate mixture was made of 20 wt% of
polyethylene glycol-400-diacrylate (PEGA), 40 wt% of
trimethylolpropane triacrylate (TMPTA), and 40 wt% dipentaerythrytol
monohydroxy pentaacrylate (DPHPA). The visible initiator used is
DIBF (5 x [10.sup.-4] molar) with N-phenyl glycine (NPG, 5 x
[10.sup.-2] molar) as the coinitiator.


8 A mixture of unsaturated polyesters and styrene from Owens-Coming
Fiberglas, Research and Development Center, Granville, Ohio. The
visible initiator system consists 2,4-diiodo-6-butoxy-3-fluorone
(DIBF), 4-octyloxyphenyliodonium hexafluoroantimonate (OPPI), and
N,N[prime]-dimethylamino-2,6-diisopropylaniline (DIDMA) with a molar
ratio of DIBF/OPPI/DIDMA = 1/2/3. The concentration of DIBF is 0.01
wt%.


Photopolymerization using Fluorone Dye

Visible Initiators

Visible initiators such as fluorone dye/coinitiator systems developed in our laboratories have been successfully used for both free radical (25) and cationic (26) photopolymerization processes. Because these initiators bleach as they initiate polymerization, a large cure depth can be obtained. However, the fluorone dyes may exhibit fluorescence emission in photopolymers after a low degree of polymerization and an incomplete photobleaching of the photoinitiators. It is interesting to know the effects of visible initiators on the fluorescence spectra of the DASB probe. Thus we investigated the applicability of the new fluorescence probe to monitor the photocuring reaction of multi-functional acrylates initiated via the visible dye initiators developed in our laboratories (19). The monomer solution was a typical formulation used in our stereo-lithographic applications: a mixture of multifunctional acrylate monomers including TMPTA, DPHPA, polyethylene glycol diacrylate with a fluorone dye initiator (DIBF), and an amine coinitiator (NPG). The fluorescence emission intensity ratio ([I.sub.470]/[I.sub.560]) of the DASB probe was found to increase linearly from 1.1 (0% conversion) to about 2.2 (32% conversion) as shown in Fig. 9a.

DASB was also used to monitor the photocuring process of a commercial polyester acrylate resin used in floor coating applications. For photoinitiation, a "hybrid" initiating system containing a fluorone dye initiator (DIBF), an onium salt (4-octyloxylphenyliodonium hexafluoro antimonate, OPPI), and an amine (DIDMA) were used (26). The incorporation of the onium salt in the initiating system produces a synergistic effect during the photoinitiation process that enables a satisfactory cure while significantly reducing the amount of DIDMA coinitiator used in the formulation (27). It was found the fluorescence intensity of the DASB probe decreased significantly when OPPI was introduced into the initiator formulation, especially in the early stage of the photocuring. This is probably due to the quenching effect by the acid generated during the irradiation of the onium salt. Nevertheless, a linear correlation between the fluorescence intensity ratio ([I.sub.470]/[I.sub.560]) and the extent of C = C conversion was obtained for a polyester acrylate resin system cured with DIBF/OPPI/DIDMA (1/2/3, molar ratio, DIBF = 0.1 wt%), as shown in Fig. 9b.

More recently, we investigated the applicabilities of the fluorescence probe technique for cure monitoring of unsaturated polyester resins using visible initiator systems. The commercial resin system studied is from the Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. and is a mixture of unsaturated polyester and styrene. The fluorescence probe, DASB, was readily dissolved into the resin formulation at a concentration of 0.01 wt% before the photocuring process. As the curing reaction proceeded, the probe fluorescence emission peak position shifted from 536 to 498 nm (a total spectral blue shift of 38 nm) as the degree of cure increased from 0% to [approximately]70%. Because of the problem of peak overlapping in the infrared spectra, it was difficult to use FTIR to monitor the degree of cure of this unsaturated polyester formulation. Thus DSC was used to determine the degree of cure by comparing the residual heat of reaction with the total heat reaction obtained when 1 wt% benzoyl peroxide was used as the thermal initiator. The DSC results correlate very well with the fluorescence intensity ratios ([I.sub.470]/[I.sub.560]) as shown in Fig. 10. Thus, it is demonstrated that fluorescence probe response can correlate with both FTIR and DSC techniques. Since the intramolecular charge transfer probes are sensitive to the changes in microviscosity, we can also correlate the probe fluorescence response with other physical/mechanical properties such as glass transition temperature (Tg), modulus, hardness, and strength of a polymer network.

Fluorescence Probe Depth ([[Tau].sub.p]) Estimation

According to the definition of fluorescence quantum yield ([[Phi].sub.f]),

[[Phi].sub.f] = [I.sub.f]/[I.sub.a] (3)

fluorescence intensity ([I.sub.f]) is proportional to the amount of light absorbed ([I.sub.a]).

[I.sub.f] = [[[Phi].sub.f].sup.*][I.sub.a] (4)

[I.sub.a] = [I.sub.0] - [I.sub.t] (5)

[I.sub.a] = [I.sub.0] (1 - [e.sup.-2.303[Epsilon]c[Tau]]) (6)

where [I.sub.0] and [I.sub.t] are the intensity values of the incidence and transmitted light, respectively; [Epsilon] is the molar absorptivity, c is the concentration of the probe and [Tau] is the thickness of the sample probed.

[I.sub.f] = [[Phi].sub.f][I.sub.0] (1 - [e.sup.-2.303[Epsilon]c[Tau]]) (7)

[Delta][I.sub.f]/[Delta][Tau] = 2.303[[Phi].sub.f][I.sub.0][Epsilon]c[e.sup.-2.303[Epsilon]c[Tau]] (8)

At the surface of the sample, [Tau] = 0, then

[Delta][I.sub.f]/[[Delta].sub.[Tau]] [where] [Tau]=0 = 2.303[[Phi].sub.f][I.sub.0][Epsilon]c (9)

If the probe depth ([[Tau].sub.p]) is defined as the thickness when [Delta][I.sub.f]/[[Delta].sub.[Tau]] ([Tau]) decreases to one tenth of its value at the surface, then

[Delta][I.sub.f]/[[Delta].sub.[Tau]] [where] [Tau]=[[Tau].sub.p] = 2.303[[Phi].sub.f][I.sub.0][Epsilon]c[e.sup.-2.303[Epsilon]c[Tau]p]

= 2.303[[Phi].sub.f][I.sub.0][Epsilon]c/10 (10)

Thus

[[Tau].sub.p] = 1 / [Epsilon]c (11)

Therefore, the probe depth is inversely proportional to the absorption coefficient and the concentration of the probe. This is to be expected, as the more the absorbance, the less the penetration depth of the excitation light. Control of the probe depth can be achieved by adjusting the probe concentration and/or the excitation wavelength since [Epsilon] is wavelength dependent. It must be pointed out that Eq 11 is only good for clear coating cases in which there is no absorption due to other components in the photopolymer system besides the probe. For DASB, if used at a concentration of 5 x [10.sup.-4] M/L, the probe depth is estimated to be 3 to 30 mm in a clear coating system. In practice, however, commercial photocurable coating formulations and especially pigmented systems are not completely transparent at the probe excitation wavelength region, and probe depths shorter than what is predicted by using Eq 11 are expected.

Coating Thickness Measurement

Coating thickness is another important parameter that must be constantly monitored and controlled in the coating industry in order to achieve a uniform coating. However, on-line and nondestructive measurement of coating thickness is still a challenging task. Because of its high sensitivity and nondestructive characteristics, we expected the fluorescence probe technique would be useful in this regard. The idea was to utilize the nascent fluorescence from the coating substrate and quench it via absorption of the emission. By doping a fluorescence probe that can absorb the nascent fluorescence from the substrate, the thicker the applied coating, the less the fluorescence emission signals can be detected from the substrate. Thus the nascent fluorescence intensity is expected to be inversely proportional to the coating thickness. Most coating substrates such as plastics, wood, glass, and paper exhibit fluorescence emissions when irradiated by a UV light, thus enabling the measurement of the coating thickness.

Figure 11 shows the nascent fluorescence excitation and emission spectra of the polyethylene terephthalate (PET) materials used in a number of applications. The peak positions for the excitation and emission spectra are at 345 and 384 nm, respectively, for the samples measured. When a coating solution containing UV curable silicone acrylate and fluorescence probe (DASB, C = 0.0005 M/L) was applied to the PET substrate, the nascent fluorescence intensity at 380 nm was found to decrease as the coating thickness increased as shown in Fig. 12. The excitation wavelength was chosen as 302 nm, which gives the most sensitive measurement. Figure 13 shows a linear correlation curve between the reduced fluorescence intensity at 380 nm (ratio of the fluorescence intensity of the coated vs. the noncoated substrate) and the coating thickness.

SUMMARY

Intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) fluorescence probes such as 5-dimethylaminonaphthalene-1-sulfonyl-n-butylamide (DASB) and 6-propionyl-2-(dimethylamino)-naphthalene (PRODAN) are useful for cure monitoring of photocurable acrylic systems with UV or visible initiators. As the curing proceeds, the fluorescence emission spectra of the probes exhibited hypsochromic spectral shifts due to the increases in matrix microviscosity. Linear correlations between the fluorescence intensity ratios and the extent of polymerization were obtained. With a fiber-optic fluorimeter, this fluorescence cure sensing technique based on ICT fluorescence probes can be readily applied to photopolymerized films, coatings and bulk materials. The technique can be applied in a variety of commercial photocurable resins.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Financial support by the Ohio Department of Development, Edison Industrial System Center and Spectra Group Limited, Inc. (SGL), is gratefully acknowledged. Support from the National Science Foundation (NSF: DMR-9013109) and Office of Naval Research (N00014-93-1-0772) was critical in the development of this cure monitoring technique and is gratefully acknowledged. We are also grateful to Dr. A. Torres-Filho, Dr. H. Shou of the Center for Photochemical Sciences, and Mr. Tom Marino and Mr. Dustin Martin of SGL, Inc., for helpful discussions. Discussions with Alex Kremers, Eugene Arthurs, and Scott Heideman at Oriel Instruments in Stratford, Conn. are also gratefully acknowledged.

REFERENCES

1. C. E. Hoyle, in Radiation Curing of Polymeric Materials; C. E. Hoyle, J. F. Kinstle, eds.; ACS Symposium Series 417; American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C. (1990), Chapter 1, p1.

2. G. R. Tyson and A. R. Shultz, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed., 17, 2059 (1979).

3. W. D. Cook, Polymer, 33, 2152 (1992).

4. D. Wang, L. Carrera, and M. J. M. Aradie, Eur. Polym. J., 29, 1379 (1993).

5. C. E. Hoyle, R. D. Hensel, and M. B. Grubb, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed., 22, 1865 (1984).

6. J. E. Moore, UV Curing: Science and Technology, Technology Marketing Corporation (1978).

7. R. D. Small, J. A. Ors, and B. S. Royse, ACS Symp. Series # 242, 325 (1984).

8. C. Decker and K. Moussa, ACS Symp. Series # 417, 439 (1990).

9. C. Decker, J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem., 30, 913 (1992).

10. N. S. Allen, S. J. Hardy, A. F. Jacobine, D. M. Glaser, B. Yang, and D. Wolf, Eur. Polym. J., 26, 1041 (1990).

11. D. C. Neckers, Chemtech, 20, 615 (1990).

12. J. C. Song and C. S. P. Sung, Macromolecules, 26, 4818 (1993), and references therein.

13. J. Paczkowski and D. C. Neckers, Macromolecules, 25, 548 (1992).

14. X. Zhang, I. N. Kotchetov, J. Paczkowski, and D. C. Neckers, J. Imaging Sci. Techol., 36, 322 (1992).

15. I. N. Kotchetov and D. C. Neckers, J. Imaging Sci. Technol., 37, 156 (1993).

16. J. Paczkowski and D. C. Neckers, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed., 31, 841 (1993).

17. O. Valdes-Aguilera, C. P. Pathak, and D. C. Neckers, Macromolecules, 23, 689 (1990).

18. J. Lipinski, H. Chojnacki, R. Rotkiewicz, and Z. R. Grabowski, Chem. Phys. Lett., 70, 449 (1980).

19. D. C. Neckers and T. Tanabe, unpublished.

20. (a) G. Mellbin and B. E. F. Smith, J. Chrom., 312, 203 (1984); (b) P. Lehtonen, J. Chrom., 314, 141 (1984); (c) ibid., 330, 243 (1985).

21. A. Okamoto, U. Katsumi, and I. Mita, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 55, 3068 (1982).

22. G. Weber and F. J. Farris, Biochemistry, 18, 3075 (1979).

23. A. M. Rollinson and H. G. Drickamer, J. Chem. Phys., 73, 5981 (1980).

24. F. Heisel, J. A. Miehe, and A. W. Szemik, Chem. Phys. Letts., 138, 321 (1987).

25. (a) O. Valdes-Aguilera, C. P. Pathak, J. Shi, D. Watson, and D. C. Neckers, Macromolecules, 25, 541 (1992). (b) A. Torres-Filho and D. C. Neckers, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 51, 931 (1994). (c) A. Torres-Filho and D. C. Neckers, RadTech Conf. Proc., 1, 259 (1994).

26. (a) Y. Bi and D. C. Neckers, Macromolecules, 27, 3683 (1994). (b) Y. Bi and D. C. Neckers, RadTech Conf. Proc., 1, 180 (1994).

27. T. Marino, D. Martin, and D. C. Neckers, RadTech Conf. Proc., 1, 169 (1994).
COPYRIGHT 1996 Society of Plastics Engineers, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1996 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Song, J.C.; Neckers, D.C.
Publication:Polymer Engineering and Science
Date:Feb 15, 1996
Words:5407
Previous Article:Fluoropolymers and their effect on processing linear low-density polyethylene.
Next Article:Qualitative analysis of twin-screw extruder performance in stabilization pelletizing of HDPE resins.
Topics:



Related Articles
Measurement of internal stresses in coatings using time resolved fluorescence.
Stress monitoring in thin polymer coatings using time resolved fluorescence.
The Development of Fluorescence Intensity Standards.
UV fluorescence monitoring of the mixing of molten polymers in a batch mixer.
Hybrid coatings as transducers in optical biosensors.
PPG patents fluorescent colorants.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters