Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,679,402 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Chapter 7 Petition Against FreeStar Dismissed -- FreeStar to Seek Compensatory and Punitive Damages.


Business Editors

SANTO DOMINGO, Dominican Republic--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 27, 2003

FreeStar Technology Corporation (OTCBB OTCBB

See OTC Bulletin Board (OTCBB).
:FSTI), announced that a memorandum of decision dismissing the Chapter 7 Involuntary Bankruptcy involuntary bankruptcy

Bankruptcy that is forced by creditors instead of being initiated by the firm or individual. Compare voluntary bankruptcy. See also Chapter 7, Chapter 11.
 Petition, brought against the Company on January 9, 2003, was signed yesterday afternoon.

Pursuant to the ruling by Honorable Judge Allan L. Gropper, the Chapter 7 Petition brought in January by vFinance, Inc., David Stefansky, Richard Rosenblum, Marc Siegel, Papell Holdings LLC (Logical Link Control) See "LANs" under data link protocol.

LLC - Logical Link Control
 and Boat Basin Investors Ltd. in the United States Bankruptcy Court bankruptcy court n. the specialized Federal court in which bankruptcy matters under the Federal Bankruptcy Act are conducted. There are several bankruptcy courts in each state, and each one's territory covers several counties.  for the Southern District of New York New York, state, United States
New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of
, will be dismissed promptly. As contended in FreeStar's Motion to Dismiss of February 4, 2003, the Petitioners held no claims against FreeStar that were not the subject of a bona fide [Latin, In good faith.] Honest; genuine; actual; authentic; acting without the intention of defrauding.

A bona fide purchaser is one who purchases property for a valuable consideration that is inducement for entering into a contract and without suspicion of being
 dispute.

FreeStar is of the opinion that the Chapter 7 Petition was filed in bad faith in order to depress FreeStar's share price and thus allow the Petitioners to cover a substantial naked short naked short

The investment position of the underwriting firm for a new issue when the underwriting firm has sold more shares short than will be issued.
 position in FSTI stock. FreeStar will seek substantial punitive and consequential damages Injury or harm that does not ensue directly and immediately from the act of a party, but only from some of the results of such act, and that is compensable by a monetary award after a judgment has been rendered in a lawsuit. , pursuant to provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, relating to the Petitioners' actions causing the Company's market capitalization to decrease significantly on and about January 10, 2003. The first of such motions, seeking statutory recovery of FreeStar's fees and costs, is likely to be filed within the next two weeks.

Paul Egan, President and Chief Executive Officer of FreeStar, stated, "While the facts of this case were clear, we commend the diligent endeavors of our defense team. Justice has been served by today's ruling and we look forward to focusing our efforts on FreeStar's core business without further distraction."

About FreeStar Technology Corporation

With Corporate headquarters in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, and offices in Dublin, Ireland, and Helsinki, Finland, FreeStar Technology is focused on exploiting a first-to-market advantage for enabling ATM and debit card transactions on the Internet and high-margin credit card processing through a leading Northern European processor, Rahaxi Processing Oy. FreeStar Technology's Enhanced Transactional Secure Software ("ETSS ETSS Episcopal Theological Seminary of the Southwest
ETSS Enhanced Transactional Secure Software
ETSS extended training service specialist (US DoD)
ETSS Engineering and Technical Support Services
") is a proprietary software package that empowers consumers to consummate e-commerce transactions on the Internet with a high level of security using credit, debit, ATM (with PIN) or smart cards. It sends an authorization number to the e-commerce merchant, rather than the consumer's credit card information, to provide a high level of security. For more information, please visit the Company's web sites at http://www.freestartech.com, http://www.rahaxi.com and http://www.epaylatina.com

Certain statements in this news release may contain forward-looking information within the meaning of Rule 175 under the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 3b-6 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and are subject to the safe harbor created by those rules. All statements, other than statements of fact, included in this release, including, without limitation, statements regarding potential future plans and objectives of the company, are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Feb 27, 2003
Words:502
Previous Article:UbiquiTel Closes Exchange Offer and Related Financing; Approximately $243 Million Will Be Realized in Interest and Principal Savings.
Next Article:FLORIDA LOTTO Jackpot Rolls over to an Estimated $27 Million.



Related Articles
Supreme Court to revisit punitive damages issue.
Punitive damages rare, independent study shows.
Limiting the punishment: after years of being the focus of proposed reforms, the court-imposed limit on punitive damages is significant for insurers....
State high courts tackle punitives.
Thompson v. Carter.(civil rights action )(Brief Article)
Thompson v. Carter.(MEDICAL CARE)(violation of civil rights)(Brief Article)
Segreti v. Giller.(EX-OFFENDERS)(retaliatory transfer)(Brief Article)
Meade v. Plummer.(LIABILITY)(Brief Article)
Supreme Court to revisit punitive damages.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles