Chaos theology: a revised creation theology.CHAOS THEOLOGY A revised creation theology Novalis 106 pages, $17.95 RUMOURS of multiple "black holes," an "Aquatic-ape" theory, D.N.A. analysis, genetic research, "stem cell stem cell In living organisms, an undifferentiated cell that can produce other cells that eventually make up specialized tissues and organs. There are two major types of stem cells, embryonic and adult. " possibilities -- all are evidence of continuing exploration in scientific disciplines seeking to discover the what, why, and how of life on this planet. With the rise of Copernican cosmology in the 17th century, and continuing through Darwinism in the 19th century, the claims of science have challenged the authority of Christianity for determining answers. This has resulted in an ongoing conflict between science and religion reaching into our own day with responses of hostility, attempts at reconciliation or just plain indifference. At the moment there are battles, at both intellectual and popular levels, raging in the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area. and England about teaching an evolutionary or Genesis-based theory of creation in schools. It is a good time to look at the debate. Peter J. Bowler
Peter J. , professor of the history of science at Queen's University Queen's University, at Kingston, Ont., Canada; nondenominational; coeducational; founded 1841 as Queen's College. It achieved university status in 1912. It has faculties of arts and sciences, education, law, medicine, and applied science, as well as schools of , Belfast, in Reconciling Science and Religion: The debate in early twentieth century Britain, provides an informed background for understanding what is taking place today. He notes how scientists and religionists alike reacted to the hard-line materialism inherited from the 19th century and how the search for truth led to attempts to bring the two sides together. The debates flourished in the academy, the pulpit and the popular press, and within both scientific and religious communities. The author draws on the thinking of many whose names are as well known in Canada as in Britain including R.J. Campbell, Bishop E.W. Barnes of Birmingham, Dean W.R. Inge, Charles Raven, Bertrand Russell (person) Bertrand Russell - (1872-1970) A British mathematician, the discoverer of Russell's paradox. , George Bernard Shaw Multiple people share the name Bernard Shaw:
Born the third son of the Honourable Charles Alexander Gore, brother of the fourth Earl of Arran. and William Temple Notable William Temples include:
While both scientific and religious understandings have evolved since that period, and while in the second half of the 20th century the conflicts appeared to simmer beneath the surface due to increasing public indifference, there is no question that they are surfacing again as the popular press reveals. However, as the author claims in his introduction, "we can surely learn something of value from the debates of earlier decades -- if only the futility of expecting the underlying issues ever to be resolved." But there are those who keep trying. In Chaos Theology: A Revised Creation Theology Sjoerd L. Bonting, a biochemist of note and an Anglican scientist-theologian, says that the scientific world view gives answers to the "How?" while the theological world view provides answers to the "Why?" questions and that they should not be intermingled. He believes this happened with the doctrine of creatio ex nihilo ex ni·hi·lo adv. & adj. Out of nothing. [Latin ex nihil , creation out of nothing, a "How?" question, and he sets out to examine the implications. He notes that this doctrine was introduced by Theophilus of Antioch
Theophilus, Patriarch of Antioch[1], succeeded Eros c. 169, and was succeeded by Maximus I c. (c. 185 C.E.) in his controversies with Marcion and the Gnostics. He identifies five problems with it: conceptual, biblical, scientific, theological and philosophical. He carefully argues each of them and readers will be drawn to his claim that the doctrine conflicts with both creation accounts in Genesis. It is his contention that in the beginning there was chaos and that, "God creates not by destroying chaos, but by ordering it, by pushing back chaos in three separations (Gen.1:2-10)." He understands chaos to be symbolized by "sea." He reflects that the last vestige vestige /ves·tige/ (ves´tij) the remnant of a structure that functioned in a previous stage of species or individual development.vestig´ial ves·tige n. of chaos will be abolished on the last day: "I saw a new heaven and a new earth ... and the sea was no more (Rev. 21:1)." In light of this approach he examines our understandings of a transcendent yet immanent im·ma·nent adj. 1. Existing or remaining within; inherent: believed in a God immanent in humans. 2. Restricted entirely to the mind; subjective. God, active in the world; the meaning of Jesus Christ and Incarnation; the nature of reconciliation and the redemption not only of humans but of the entire cosmos. The problem of evil is examined in detail and identified as "inherent in the remaining element of chaos." This fascinating study, developed to harmonize with scientific advances as we come to understand them, acknowledges that God is indeed the Creator bringing order out of chaos initially and continually until all has been accomplished. As the author says, "From biblical evidence and our insight into cosmic evolution, we may conclude that Jesus is the cosmic Christ, who is in union with the entire cosmos and who will bring the entire cosmos, including humans, to completion and fulfillment on the last day." |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion