Printer Friendly
The Free Library
5,677,251 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Chandler v. Crosby.


U.S. Appeals Court

EXHAUSTION

PLRA PLRA Partido Liberal Radical Autentico (Paraguay)
PLRA Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995
 -- Prison Litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute.

When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation.
 Reform Act

Chandler v. Crosby, 379 F.3d 1278 (11th Cir. 2004). Death row inmates brought a class action against state prison officials, alleging that high temperatures in their prison cells during the summer months amounted to cruel and unusual punishment Such punishment as would amount to torture or barbarity, any cruel and degrading punishment not known to the Common Law, or any fine, penalty, confinement, or treatment that is so disproportionate to the offense as to shock the moral sense of the community. . The district court denied relief following a bench trial and the inmates appealed. The appeals court affirmed, finding that the inmates failed to satisfy the objective component of their Eighth Amendment claim. The court held that the certified class of prisoner-plaintiffs satisfied the exhaustion requirement of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) through "vicarious vicarious /vi·car·i·ous/ (vi-kar´e-us)
1. acting in the place of another or of something else.

2. occurring at an abnormal site.


vi·car·i·ous
adj.
1.
 exhaustion" when one or more class members exhausted his administrative remedies with respect to each claim raised by the class. (Union Correctional Institution, Florida)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U5FL
Date:Nov 1, 2004
Words:127
Previous Article:Boyd v. Corrections Corp. of America.(prisoner abuse)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Deleon v. Doe.(violation of constitutional rights)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. district court: diet exercise privileges religious services visits.(Administrative Segregation)
Ali v. District of Columbia.(violation of United States Constitution. 11th Amendment)
Terry Ex Rel. Terry v. Hill.(PRETRIAL DETENTION)(Brief Article)
Wever v. Lincoln County, Nebraska.(LIABILITY)(Brief Article)
Jones v. Blanas.(PRETRIAL DETENTION)(Brief Article)
Davis v. Hall.(FALSE IMPRISONMENT/ARREST)(violation of United States Constitution. 14th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Davis v. Hall.(due process violations)(Brief Article)
Davis v. Hall.(violation of due process of law)(Brief Article)
Lewis v. Washington.(prisoners alleges violation of their constitutional rights )(Brief Article)
Lewis v. Washington.(class action lawsuits)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles