Cervical cancer screening still needed after age 50.Matejka Rebolj and colleagues looked at the incidence of cervical cancer after several negative cervical smear tests at different ages. They used a prospective observational study of incidence of cervical cancer after the third consecutive negative result based on individual level data in a Dutch national registry of histopathology and cytopathology (PALGA). Their study population comprised 218 847 women aged 45-54 and 445 382 aged 30-44 at the time of the third negative smear test. The main outcome measures were the 10-year cumulative incidence of interval cervical cancer. They found that 105 women developed cervical cancer within 2 595 964 woman-years at risk after the third negative result at age 30-44 and 42 within 1 278 532 woman-years at risk after age 45-54. During follow-up, both age groups had similar levels of screening. After 10 years of follow-up, the cumulative incidence rate of cervical cancer was similar: 41/100 000 (95% CI 33-51) in the younger group and 36/100 000 (CI 24-52) in the older group (p=0.48). The cumulative incidence rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1+ was twice as high in the younger than in the older group (p<0.001). They concluded that the risk for cervical cancer after several negative smear results by age 50 is similar to the risk at younger ages. Even after several negative smear results, age is not a good discriminative factor for early cessation of cervical cancer screening. Rebolj M, et al. BMJ 2009; 338: b1354. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion