Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,267,153 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Cauley & Geller, LLP Announces Class Action Lawsuit Against Pacificare Health Systems, Inc.


Business Editors & Legal Writers

BOCA RATON, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 1, 2000

Seeking Damages On Behalf Of Shareholders

The Law Firm of Cauley & Geller, LLP LLP - Lower Layer Protocol  announced today that it has filed a class action in the United States District Court United States District Court

In the U.S., any of the 94 trial courts of general jurisdiction in the federal judicial system. Each state, as well as the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, has at least one federal district court.
 for the Central District of California on behalf of all individuals and institutional investors that purchased the securities of Pacificare Health Systems PacifiCare Health Systems (former NYSE: PHS) was a Fortune 500 healthcare company based in Cypress, California. It was acquired by UnitedHealth Group (NYSE: UNH) in late 2005, which continues to market health plans under the PacifiCare name. , Inc. ("PacifiCare" or the "Company" ) (Nasdaq:PHSY PHSY PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc ) between October 27, 1999 and October 10, 2000, inclusive (the "Class Period").

The complaint charges that the Company, certain of its officers and directors and one of its largest shareholders violated the federal securities laws by providing materially false and misleading information about the Company's financial condition, and as a result of these false and misleading statements the Company's stock traded at artificially inflated prices during the class period. Specifically, the complaint alleges that PacifiCare's interim results were false and materially misstated due to its failure to properly record medical expenses, particularly its under-accrual of incurred but not reported Incurred but not reported (IBNR) is a term in common use in general insurance.

When a policy of general insurance is written it will typically cover a 12 month period from inception of the policy.
 costs ("IBNR IBNR Incurred But Not Reported
IBNR Interesting But Not Relevant
"). In order to inflate the price of PacifiCare's stock, defendants caused the Company to falsely report its results for Q3 1999, Q4 1999, Q1 2000 and Q2 2000 by misstating its results through its deliberate under-accrual of medical expenses and its reserves for doubtful accounts receivable, all of which resulted in artificially inflating PacifiCare's earnings per share ("EPS (Encapsulated PostScript) A PostScript file format used to transfer a graphic image between applications and platforms. EPS files contain PostScript code as well as an optional preview image in TIFF, WMF, PICT or EPSI, the latter being an ASCII-only format. "). The complaint further alleges that defendants misrepresented that the revenues PacifiCare was reporting were consistent with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles The standard accounting rules, regulations, and procedures used by companies in maintaining their financial records.

Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) provide companies and accountants with a consistent set of guidelines that cover both broad accounting
 ("GAAP GAAP

See: Generally Accepted Accounting Principles


GAAP

See generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
"), which, together with defendants' false representations that PacifiCare would post Q3 EPS of $1.90, operated to artificially inflate the price of PacifiCare stock to a Class Period high of $72-5/16 on June 16, 2000. While PacifiCare's shares were inflated, defendants sold approximately $50,000,000 worth of PacifiCare stock. On October 10, 2000, PacifiCare revealed that it was in fact suffering a huge decline in revenues, was not posting EPS growth as earlier represented, and contrary to defendants' repeated assurances, PacifiCare was forced to reveal the problems it had been experiencing during the Class Period in attempting to grow its business. This announcement caused its stock price to drop to as low as $14-5/8 (or over $18 per share) on record volume of 5.6 million shares on October 11, 2000, causing tens of millions of dollars in damages to members of the Class.

Cauley & Geller, LLP has substantial experience representing investors in securities fraud class action lawsuits such as this. The firm has offices in Florida, Arkansas and California, but represents shareholders from throughout the nation. If you have any questions about how you may be able to recover for your losses, or if you would like to consider serving as one of the lead plaintiffs in this lawsuit, you must meet certain requirements and take appropriate action by January 29, 2001. You are encouraged to call or e-mail the Firm or visit the Firm's website at www.classlawyer.com.
COPYRIGHT 2000 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2000, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Dec 1, 2000
Words:493
Previous Article:International Dispensing: Investors Support Revolutionary Technology for Flexible Packaging Applications.
Next Article:Cauley & Geller, LLP Announces Class Action Lawsuit Against Lucent Technologies.
Topics:



Related Articles
Cauley & Geller, L.L.P. Announce Securities Lawsuit Filed On Behalf of Purchasers of Conseco Inc. Securities.
Correcting Deadline Action Date in Cauley & Geller, LLP Class Action Lawsuit Against Profit Recovery Group International, Inc. Release Issued June...
Notice to Investors Concerning Pending Lawsuits, by Cauley & Geller, LLP.
Notice to Investors Concerning Pending Lawsuits, by Cauley & Geller, LLP.
Notice to Investors Concerning Pending Lawsuits, by Cauley & Geller, LLP.
Notice to Investors Concerning Pending Lawsuits, by Cauley & Geller, LLP.
[2] Notice to Investors Concerning Pending Lawsuits, by Cauley & Geller LLP.
Notice to Investors Concerning Pending Lawsuits, by Cauley & Geller LLP.
[3] Notice to Investors Concerning Pending Lawsuits, by Cauley & Geller LLP.
[4] Notice to Investors Concerning Pending Lawsuits, by Cauley & Geller LLP.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles