Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,595,263 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Castle, Petersen & Krause, LLP Announces That Police Overtime Lawsuit against the City of Los Angeles is Headed to Trial.


- United States District Court United States District Court

In the U.S., any of the 94 trial courts of general jurisdiction in the federal judicial system. Each state, as well as the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, has at least one federal district court.
 Denies City's Motion and Orders Case to Trial

- City's Major Defenses Die on the Vine

- Class Certification/Notice in Other LAPD 1. LAPD - Link Access Procedure on the D channel.
2. LAPD - Los Angeles Police Department.
 Overtime Lawsuit

NEWPORT BEACH Newport Beach, residential and resort city (1990 pop. 66,643), Orange co., S Calif., on Newport Bay and the Pacific Ocean; inc. 1906. It is a popular seaside resort and yachting center. Manufactures include electrical and medical equipment, computers, boats, and adhesives. , Calif. -- Castle, Petersen & Krause, LLP LLP - Lower Layer Protocol  announced today that on January 23, 2007, in the case of Nolan, et al. v. City of Los Angeles
For the city, see Los Angeles, California.
The City of Los Angeles was a streamlined passenger train jointly operated by the Chicago and North Western Railway and the Union Pacific Railroad.
 ("Nolan"), the U.S. District Court, Central District of California denied the City of Los Angeles' Motion for Summary Judgment motion for summary judgment n. a written request for a judgment in the moving party's favor before a lawsuit goes to trial and based on recorded (testimony outside court) affidavits (or declarations under penalty of perjury), depositions, admissions of fact, answers , setting the stage for the case to move to trail. Gregory G. Petersen, a partner in Castle, Petersen & Krause, brought this case to court on behalf of 36 Los Angeles Police Sergeants, Lieutenants and Detectives and against the City of Los Angeles to recover unpaid overtime wages. The officers contend that the Los Angeles Police Department "LAPD" and "L.A.P.D." redirect here. For other uses, see LAPD (disambiguation).

This article or section is written like an .
 ("LAPD") required them to work overtime without compensation in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act Fair Labor Standards Act or Wages and Hours Act, passed by the U.S. Congress in 1938 to establish minimum living standards for workers engaged directly or indirectly in interstate commerce, including those involved in production of goods bound  ("FLSA FLSA Fair Labor Standards Act
FLSA Fedora Legacy Security Advisory
"). The suit asserts that the 36 LAPD officers have regularly worked overtime without compensation; that the LAPD has an "unwritten policy" discouraging the reporting of overtime work for less than an hour's time; and that the department's supervisors were aware of such practices.

In making its Motion for Summary Judgment, the City claimed that the commanding officers within the LAPD were not aware of such an "unwritten policy" and did nothing to enforce such a policy. Additionally, the City claimed that the LAPD neither knew nor had reason to know that officers were working overtime without pay in violation of the LAPD's written policy.

However, the District Court denied the City's Motion, ruling that a rational trier of fact trier of fact n. the judge or jury responsible for deciding factual issues in a trial. If there is no jury the judge is the trier of fact as well as the trier of the law.  (a jury) could infer from the evidence presented by the officers that the "LAPD sanctioned an 'unwritten policy' pursuant to which supervising officers pressured their subordinates not to report overtime for less than an hour." In response to the City's alternate "ignorance" defense, the court ruled that a rational trier of fact could conclude from evidence presented by the officers that their supervisors were present at the same time, saw them engaged in work activities, or relayed assignments to them outside of their shifts, and that their supervisors knew or should have known that the officers were working unpaid overtime.

As a result of the District Court's ruling, the 36 officers included in the Nolan case will soon be headed for trial.

The Nolan case is one of a series of cases filed by the firm against the City of Los Angeles alleging overtime violations within the Los Angeles Police Department. In a similar case, the District Court determined that Alaniz, et. al. v. City of Los Angeles ("Alaniz") should be initially certified as a Collective Action. Several hundred officers have already joined the Alaniz case, with approximately 20 to 25 officers per week joining the case based on word of mouth discussions within the LAPD and without any notice from the court. As a result of the preliminary approval, the court has determined that Notice of a Collective Action will be sent to approximately 9,000 Police Officers, Sergeants, Detectives and Lieutenants who may then also join the other officers in the lawsuit that allege they were not properly compensated for all overtime by the LAPD. The firm expects the Alaniz Notice to be sent out within the next month.

About Castle, Petersen & Krause, LLP

The law firm of Castle, Petersen, & Krause LLP, headquartered in Newport Beach, CA, specializes in labor and employment law and litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute.

When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation.
, and business litigation. The firm's areas of focus within labor and employment include civil rights, labor relations, contract negotiations, disciplinary actions, FLSA, discrimination, retaliation, wage and hour issues, and wrongful termination wrongful termination n. a right of an employee to sue his/her employer for damages (loss of wage and "fringe" benefits, and, if against "public policy," for punitive damages). . Castle, Petersen & Krause has a near 30-year history of representing law enforcement officers and their associations in contract negotiations, disciplinary actions, civil rights claims, and class actions related to FLSA and wage and hours matters. The firm also has a history of success in recovering overtime wages from public and private employers through FLSA class action claims, including recent cases against the City of Los Angeles and companies in the hospitality and fitness industries. Additionally, Castle, Petersen & Krause provides its clients counsel in the areas of construction defect, intellectual property, product liability and first and third party insurance litigation, as well as personal injury claims. More information on Castle, Petersen & Krause can be found at www.cpk-law.com.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Jan 29, 2007
Words:721
Previous Article:Timken Revises Fourth-Quarter Earnings Estimate, Forecasts Stronger Year in 2007.
Next Article:Sycamore Networks Announces Receipt of Extension Granted by the NASDAQ Listing Qualifications Panel.
Topics:



Related Articles
CITY TO PAY MORE THAN $3 MILLION SUM SETTLES LAPD LAWSUIT.
LAPD PAY SUIT SETTLED OWED OVERTIME TOTALS $40 MILLION.
$40 MILLION DEAL; L.A., COPS TO SETTLE OT CASE.
CITY COUNCIL MAY SETTLE POLICE LAWSUIT.
State Farm settles O.T. suit; more adjuster cases in line?
BRIEFLY.
GEORGIA OFFICIALS WARY OF COP'S SEX LAWSUIT.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles