Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,595,263 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Case Closed.


A 1997 case finally came to an end for a Little Rock man who worked for attorney Sam Perroni and then sued him.

In May, Robert M. Berry, a psychologist who has a business serving as a consultant to trial attorneys agreed to pay Perroni $3,000 and further costs for services he didn't provide.

Berry worked with Perroni to help him prepare developer Jay DeHaven's defense when he was indicted INDICTED, practice. When a man is accused by a bill of indictment preferred by a grand jury, he is said to be indicted.  in 1993. DeHaven was acquitted at trial.

Berry and Perroni had worked together on a number of cases over the years, but their relationship ended after the DeHaven case.

Berry said he was only partially paid for his work and Perroni still owed him $18,891, according to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 his lawsuit filed in Pulaski County Pulaski County is the name of several counties in the United States:
  • Pulaski County, Arkansas
  • Pulaski County, Georgia
  • Pulaski County, Illinois
  • Pulaski County, Indiana
  • Pulaski County, Kentucky
  • Pulaski County, Missouri
  • Pulaski County, Virginia
 Circuit Court.

Perroni turned around and sued Berry for $3,000 for services not provided in another trial.

Then the case got ugly.

In court papers, Perroni asked Berry to admit that alcoholism alcoholism, disease characterized by impaired control over the consumption of alcoholic beverages. Alcoholism is a serious problem worldwide; in the United States the wide availability of alcoholic beverages makes alcohol the most accessible drug, and alcoholism is  impaired his ability to provide the services Perroni requested. Berry denied the accusation and called it "deliberately defamatory def·a·ma·tion  
n.
The act of defaming; calumny.



de·fama·tory adj.
."

Berry lost his case against Perroni, but Perroni won and received the $3,000 judgment in April 1999.

But Berry didn't pay. It wasn't until Perroni filed a motion for contempt that Berry came through with the money.
COPYRIGHT 2001 Journal Publishing, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Conflict between attorney and psychologist
Comment:Case Closed.(Conflict between attorney and psychologist)
Publication:Arkansas Business
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Nov 5, 2001
Words:214
Previous Article:Getting Under Judge's Skin.
Next Article:Hole in One.
Topics:



Related Articles
How to protect yourself from malpractice at trial while protecting your clients on appeal.
Wine ruling a setback for consumers.
FACDL fights regional conflict counsel plan: 'we don't think it's funded properly and don't think it can adequately represent the clients'.
Five new regional conflict counsels off and running.
Supreme Court reinstates stay in CCCRC case: oral arguments now slated for February 27.
Challenge slows efforts to set up the CCCRC offices.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles