Captive insurers enjoy popularity but still face hard-market realities. (Briefing).The rapidly hardening insurance market of the past two years has encouraged an explosion of alternative-market insurance solutions, especially captive formation. But there's a down side--reinsurers, under intense pressure from losses attributed to events of Sept. 11,2001, and the stock market, are much more reluctant to back captives fully. Adding to the complexity is the shrinking number of insurers willing to act as fronts--to lend their good name and high financial-strength ratings to captives as support, for a fee. In a panel discussion on these hard-market realities at the International Captives Congress in Bermuda, Paul Baffle, a partner with JLT Risk Solutions Management (Bermuda) Ltd., a captive manager, said there are "harsh realities we have to deal with out there today." With restricted availability of reinsurance and rising costs for fronting services, increased retentions and stricter collateral requirements, captives are squeezed by a classic supply-and-demand problem. Robert Davis, senior vice president of business development with Ace Risk Management, said the hard market in fronting, from the insurer's perspective, has more peril than it once did. "In order to satisfy some of the more stringent corporate-governance rules, particularly since the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, using a quality front carrier is needed," he said. Why would an insurer get involved in fronting? "There's a high return on equity," said Davis. "It also lowers the expense ratio when you cede reinsurance business to a captive in exchange for a fee." But the downsides include a reduced net-to-gross ratio. "If the ratio is out of proportion--a lot more gross than net--it is looked on unfavorably by rating agencies," he said. 2002 New Captive Formations by Domicile Cayman Islands 97 Bermuda 79 Vermont 70 Guernsey 49 British Virgin Islands 45 Barbados 19 Ireland 18 South Carolina 21 Hawaii 16 All Other Non-U.S. 24 Other U.S. States 24 |
|
||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion