Cancer-vaccine study is retracted.A promising cancer treatment has been dealt a setback, as the authors of a key paper have reluctantly retracted their report. Three years ago, Alexander Kugler of the University of Gottingen in Germany and his colleagues described limited success with a new cancer-vaccine strategy in Nature Medicine (SN: 3/4/00, p. 149). The researchers had taken tumor cells from people with kidney cancer Kidney Cancer Definition Kidney cancer is a disease in which the cells in certain tissues of the kidney start to grow uncontrollably and form tumors. , fused them to the patients' own immune cells, and injected the combination back into the patients. In several of the volunteers, this stimulated an immune response immune response n. An integrated bodily response to an antigen, especially one mediated by lymphocytes and involving recognition of antigens by specific antibodies or previously sensitized lymphocytes. against secondary tumors and led to complete remission complete remission Complete response Oncology Disappearance of all signs and symptoms of disease–eg, cancer, multiple sclerosis, with normalization of all biochemical and radiologic parameters, as well as a negative repeat biopsy–pathologic remission. . Criticism of the study's quality and ethics emerged, however, and the University of Gottingen launched an investigation. In November 2002, officials there concluded that Kugler, but not his coauthors, was guilty of negligence and that the paper didn't meet standards of good scientific practice. For example, the university's ethics committee ethics committee A multidisciplinary hospital body composed of a broad spectrum of personnel–eg, physicians, nurses, social workers, priests, and others, which addresses the moral and ethical issues within the hospital. See DNR, Institutional review board. hadn't approved the human experimentation. Kugler's coauthors initially resisted retracting the paper because they felt the conclusions of their study remained valid, but the editors of Nature Medicine eventually convinced the investigators that the large number of errors in the published data and ethical lapses by Kugler warranted the action. Other researchers stress that the retraction In the law of Defamation, a formal recanting of the libelous or slanderous material. Retraction is not a defense to defamation, but under certain circumstances, it is admissible in Mitigation of Damages. Cross-references Libel and Slander. , published in the September Nature Medicine, doesn't negate the potential of using fused tumor and immune cells to stimulate a patient's immune system immune system Cells, cell products, organs, and structures of the body involved in the detection and destruction of foreign invaders, such as bacteria, viruses, and cancer cells. Immunity is based on the system's ability to launch a defense against such invaders. against cancer. "There are plenty of papers ... that show in animal studies that the approach is valid," says Richard Vile of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn. Work on the strategy continues. In fact, in the journal issue that carries the retraction, Vile and his colleagues describe a novel process for fusing cancer and immune cells. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion