Canadian World Fund: Investment Update-Unaudited.TORONTO -- Canadian Canadian (kənā`dēən), river, 906 mi (1,458 km) long, rising in NE New Mexico. and flowing E across N Texas and central Oklahoma into the Arkansas River in E Oklahoma. World Fund Limited (CWF CWF Colonial Williamsburg Foundation CWF Canada West Foundation (Economic Institute) CWF Canadian Wildlife Federation CWF Common Working File CWF Christian Women's Fellowship CWF Cool White Fluorescent CWF Campaign for Working Families )(TSX TSX Toronto Stock Exchange (TSE before April, 2002) TSX Transfer from Stack Pointer to Index TSX True Space Extension :CWF) reports on an unaudited basis that its net asset value per share (NAV See navigation system and navigation bar. ) at February 28, 2006 was $6.26, resulting in a year-to-date NAV return of 8.9%. This compares with the 2.1% return of the benchmark Morgan Stanley loonie dollar - the basic monetary unit in many countries; equal to 100 cents terms, for the same period. The closing price of CWF's common shares at February 28 was $4.95, resulting in a one-year market return of 6.0%. The benchmark posted 4.1% for the same period. The geographic sector weightings of CWF's investment portfolio at market as of February 28, 2006 were as follows: North America 34.5% Asia 24.2% United Kingdom 21.6% Europe (excluding U.K.) 9.2% Latin America 8.8% Other 1.7% The top ten investments which comprised 27.0% of the investment portfolio at market, excluding cash, as of February 28, 2006 were as follows: March Networks Corporation (Canada) 5.1% Google Inc. (United States) 2.7% Grupo Financiero Banorte S.A. de C.V. (Mexico) 2.6% Apple Computer Inc. (United States) 2.6% Mahindra & Mahindra Limited (India) 2.5% Autonomy Corporation plc (United Kingdom) 2.4% Equinox Minerals Limited (Canada) 2.3% Grupo Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico) 2.3% Daniel Stewart Securities plc (United Kingdom) 2.3% Tethyan Copper Company Limited (Pakistan) 2.2% Canadian World Fund Limited (TSX:CWF) |
|
||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion