Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,573,952 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Canada should tighten screening and monitoring of visitors to prevent entry of terrorists, C.D. Howe study says.


Toronto, November 13, 2002 -- Canadian immigration authorities immigration authorities nplservicio sg de inmigración

immigration authorities nplservice m de l'immigration

 should toughen up screening and monitoring of visitors in order to prevent terrorists and criminals from joining the large numbers of visitors granted access to the country, says a C.D. Howe Institute Commentary published today.

In the Commentary, entitled "US and Canadian Immigration Policies An immigration policy is any policy of a state that affects the transit of persons across its borders, but especially those that intend to work and to remain in the country. : Marching Together to Different Tunes," Canadian immigration immigration, entrance of a person (an alien) into a new country for the purpose of establishing permanent residence. Motives for immigration, like those for migration generally, are often economic, although religious or political factors may be very important.  lawyer Peter Rekai compares Canadian and US immigration policies as viewed through the lens of an increasingly integrated and security-conscious North America North America, third largest continent (1990 est. pop. 365,000,000), c.9,400,000 sq mi (24,346,000 sq km), the northern of the two continents of the Western Hemisphere.  in the post-September 11, 2001, era.

Rekai notes that while refugees now face more thorough checks and a greater likelihood of detention, the result of "such enhanced screening (may be that) sophisticated wrongdoers will be tempted to avoid this scrutiny in favour of joining the vast numbers of tourists, business travelers and international students that are granted generous access to North America."

He added that there have been no significant staff increases in overseas visa offices to assess visitor-visa applications nor does the federal government have any plans for closer monitoring of visa compliance. The United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area. , Rekai said, is far ahead of Canada in this regard.

Rekai said the solution is not to reduce the inflow in·flow  
n.
1. The act or process of flowing in or into: an inflow of water; an inflow of information.

2.
 of visitors or temporary workers. Rather, the Canadian government should devote more resources to ensuring visa compliance. Canada should improve its tracking systems and also place "greater responsibility and liability on the shoulders of the commercial and academic sectors, which are direct beneficiaries of the large influx of temporary entrants."

He said that "the United States and Canada share markedly similar problems" in the area of border security and should continue to work together in this area. However, while security requires that the United States and Canada move in tandem Adv. 1. in tandem - one behind the other; "ride tandem on a bicycle built for two"; "riding horses down the path in tandem"
tandem
 on a number of border issues, there is no compelling security rationale for Canada to harmonize its immigrant selection criteria. Canada should be able to continue to choose immigrants and foreign workers foreign workers

Those who work in a foreign country without initially intending to settle there and without the benefits of citizenship in the host country. Some are recruited to supplement the workforce of a host country for a limited term or to provide skills on a
 using different criteria than its neighbour.

The Commentary is part of a special C.D. Howe Institute series called "The Border Papers."

The Border Papers

"The Border Papers" is a special C.D. Howe Institute Commentary series examining specific policy challenges Canada faces as it moves toward deeper Western Hemispheric integration, beginning with the United States. The first paper in the series was "Shaping the Future of the North American North American

named after North America.


North American blastomycosis
see North American blastomycosis.

North American cattle tick
see boophilusannulatus.
 Economic Space: A Framework for Action," by Wendy Dobson dob·son  
n.
See hellgrammite.



[Probably from the name Dobson.]

Noun 1. dobson - large brown aquatic larva of the dobsonfly; used as fishing bait
hellgrammiate
. The second paper looked at Canada-US defense issues, while a third examined North American currency issues. A fourth study examined dispute resolution in the NAFTA NAFTA
 in full North American Free Trade Agreement

Trade pact signed by Canada, the U.S., and Mexico in 1992, which took effect in 1994. Inspired by the success of the European Community in reducing trade barriers among its members, NAFTA created the world's
, and the fifth looked at Mexico and North American integration. This paper, the sixth, examines immigration policies in the United States and Canada. Others will explore such policy areas as tax policy, border issues and energy. The series will conclude with a capstone paper. Each paper will outline available options and offer policy recommendations. A central concern of the series is to answer the question, should deepening integration be managed incrementally or would a Big Idea better advance Canada's strategic interests? The Donner Canadian Foundation has generously provided financial support for the series. An independent Advisory Group provides guidance on the overall direction of The Border Papers. However, as with all C.D. Howe Institute publications, the opinions expressed in the series are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Advisory Group, whose members include:
Wendy Dobson (Chair)
University of Toronto

The Hon. Peter Lougheed
Bennett Jones LLP

The Hon. Donald S. Macdonald
UBS Bunting Warburg Inc.

Jack M. Mintz
C.D. Howe Institute

Reid Morden
RM&A

Roger Phillips
Corporate Director

Jeffrey Schott
Institute for International
Economics

Gustavo Vega
Brown University

Derek H. Burney
CAE

Clarence Chandran

Peter C. Godsoe
Bank of Nova Scotia

Michael Hart
Carleton University

Gary C. Hufbauer
Institute for International
Economics


The C.D. Howe Institute is Canada's leading independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit economic policy research institution. Its individual and corporate members are drawn from business, labor, agriculture, universities and the professions.

For further information, contact:
Marie Hubbs (media relations), C.D. Howe Institute
phone: (416) 865-1904; fax: (416) 865-1866;
e-mail: cdhowe@cdhowe.org; Internet: www.cdhowe.org


"US and Canadian Immigration Policies: Marching Together to Different Tunes," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary 171, by Peter Rekai (November 2002). 24 pp.; $12.00 (prepaid pre·pay  
tr.v. pre·paid, pre·pay·ing, pre·pays
To pay or pay for beforehand.



pre·payment n.
, plus postage & handling and GST--please contact the Institute for details). ISBN ISBN
abbr.
International Standard Book Number


ISBN International Standard Book Number

ISBN n abbr (= International Standard Book Number) → ISBN m 
 0-88806-597-5.

Copies are available from: Renouf Publishing Company Limited, 5369 Canotek Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1J 9J3; or directly from the C.D. Howe Institute, 125 Adelaide Street East, Toronto, Ontario M5C 1L7. The full text of this publication is also available from the Institute's Internet website at www.cdhowe.org.
COPYRIGHT 2002 C.D. Howe Research Institute
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:C.D. Howe Institute Commentary
Geographic Code:1CANA
Date:Nov 1, 2002
Words:779
Previous Article:US and Canadian immigration policies: marching together to different tunes. (The Border Papers).
Next Article:For the good of the patients: financial incentives to improve stability in the Canadian health care system.
Topics:



Related Articles
Mansion expansion.
US and Canadian immigration policies: marching together to different tunes. (The Border Papers).
Canada must act to prevent major loss of exports, jobs and investment from new terror threats in the U.S.: C.D. Howe Institute report.
More government is not the answer: instead of making it more difficult for terrorists to enter this country, the 9/11 Commission would intrude on the...
Inside fortress North America: a huge challenge for Canada is maintaining its close trading relationship with the United States without losing its...
The North American imperative: a public-good framework for Canada-U.S. economic and security cooperation.
Breaking the border impasse: the federal government is bolstering border security with new investments, while trying to make trade more efficient.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles