Printer Friendly
The Free Library
23,383,293 articles and books


California performance review recommends sweeping changes to state government.

After five months of examining organizational structures, analyzing data, and meeting with stakeholders, the California Performance Review has released a 2,500-page document outlining more than 1,000 recommendations for reforming and revitalizing California state government. The plan, which calls for increased accountability and efficiency and improved service delivery to residents, is estimated to save the state more than $32 billion over five years.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger commissioned the 275-member panel to perform a top-to-bottom review of state government that extended to virtually every program and process in almost every department and agency. The CPR operated under five guiding principles: (1) put people first, (2) save taxpayer dollars; (3) be accountable and efficient; (4) be visionary and innovative; and (5) be productive and performance-driven.

"We are facing some monumental problems in the state--no surprise there," said Chon Gutierrez, co-executive director of the CPR. "But the consequences of not doing something now to mend the structural disrepair in California government are frightening.

"As the governor said, we can't wait any longer for the next guys to come along and fix this stuff. We are the next guys. We were directed to get after the problems and come up with innovative, common sense solutions, and that's what we did. In effect, the ... process amounted to just about the world's largest brainstorm."

The plan would eliminate more than 100 boards and commissions, consolidate state services, and impose mandates on departments. The elimination of the boards and commissions is estimated to save the state $34 million a year and trim 1,153 jobs. Business leaders, union leaders, educators, ethnic activists, and others say the elimination of the boards and commissions would make it harder for citizens and businesses to reach state government. State union officials have also criticized the plan, saying it would make worker concerns secondary to stimulating the economy.

In the area of state budgeting, the report recommends that all major decisions on managing the state's fiscal affairs fall under the direction of a new Office of Management and Budget. The panel found that the key agencies that oversee state finances (finance, general services, and the state personnel board) "are so fragmented that strategic management and efficient operation is currently impossible." The report also recommends that the state go to a biennial budget.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Government Finance Officers Association
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:News & Numbers
Publication:Government Finance Review
Geographic Code:1U9CA
Date:Dec 1, 2004
Words:381
Previous Article:Rating agencies give Nassau County an "A" for financial recovery.
Next Article:New releases.
Topics:



Related Articles
A blueprint for state and local government budgeting.
Minnesota spreads the word about efficient programs.
Winter Committee Meeting Update.
SUNNY DAY FOR LANDFILL NEIGHBORS: INSPECTOR TO BE RETAINED.
NO CRACK-CONTRA LINK FOUND : SHERIFF'S PROBE FAILS TO UNEARTH SUPPORT CONCERNING CLAIMS OF CONNECTION.
Winter committee meeting update. (Profiling GFOA).
The future of peer review: it is a misconception that the CBA requires peer review.
ARNOLD'S REFORMS FIZZLING FRACTION OF OVERHAUL SUGGESTIONS ENACTED.
Building Better Boards: A Blueprint for Effective Governance.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters