California Taxpayers, Taxpayer & Non-Profit Groups Sue Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy to Recover State Bond Funds.Lawsuit Claims SMMC SMMC Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps SMMC Scottish Motorsport Marshals Club (Edinburgh, Scotland) SMMC Scottish Midweek Mountaineering Club (UK) SMMC System Maintenance Monitoring Console Spent Bond Funds Illegally VENTURA, Calif. -- Several California taxpayers, the Santa Barbara Santa Barbara (săn'tə bär`brə, –bərə), city (1990 pop. 85,571), seat of Santa Barbara co., S Calif., on the Pacific Ocean; inc. 1850. County Taxpayers' Association, and a non-profit preservation group filed suit yesterday in Ventura County Superior Court accusing the Santa Monica Santa Monica (săn`tə mŏn`ĭkə), city (1990 pop. 86,905), Los Angeles co., S Calif., on Santa Monica Bay; inc. 1886. Tourism and retailing are important, and the city has motion-picture, biotechnology, and software industries. Mountain Conservancy (SMMC) of illegally using Proposition 50 Clean Water bond funds and asking the court to recover the misused funds. "We must hold state agencies like the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy The Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy is an agency of the state of California in the United States founded in 1979 and dedicated to the acquisition of land in the Santa Susana and Santa Monica Mountains and the Simi Hills, north and west of Los Angeles, for preservation as open accountable for millions of taxpayers' dollars they receive through state bond funds," said Jere Robings, the lead plaintiff and a Ventura County resident. "We cannot let the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy, or any other agency, violate the law and this lawsuit demonstrates that we will go to court to get the taxpayers' money back." The SMMC is a powerful state agency that owns and controls thousands of acres of land in Los Angeles Los Angeles (lôs ăn`jələs, lŏs, ăn`jəlēz'), city (1990 pop. 3,485,398), seat of Los Angeles co., S Calif.; inc. 1850. and Ventura Counties. Much of that land is under the control of nine joint powers authorities (JPA's) the SMMC has created to expand its reach. Critics claim these interlocked JPA's are nothing more than shills for the SMMC. The plaintiffs specifically cite SMMC's transfer of hundreds of thousands of dollars of Prop 50 funds to its sister agency, the Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority (MRCA MRCA Most Recent Common Ancestor MRCA Midwest Roofing Contractors Association MRCA Multi-Role Combat Aircraft MRCA Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority (California) MRCA Malaysian Retailer-Chains Association ). The complaint states that the SMMC spent Prop 50 grant money to develop the Malibu Public Works Plan (PWP PWP Parents Without Partners PWP People With Parkinson's (disease) PWP Plot, What Plot? PWP Password Protected PWP Professional Women Photographers PWP Porn Without Plot (fanfiction and erotica) ) and that SMMC spent bond funds to pay its lawyers to defend a lawsuit filed by local residents in 2000 to stop SMMC's illegal use of its property. "The Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy is the poster child for why taxpayers must be vigilant and put a stop to the illegal use of millions of dollars of voter approved bond funds," said Joe Armendariz, Executive Director of the Santa Barbara Taxpayers' Association, whose organization is one of the co-plaintiffs. "The Conservancy has been audited by the State Office of Finance for the last three straight years, and yet they keep playing loose and fast with millions of taxpayer dollars." On October 4, a group of unnamed taxpayers sent a demand letter to California State Attorney General Bill Lockyer and the California Department of Finance The California Department of Finance is located in Sacramento, California. It is responsible resource allocation for the state’s annual financial plan. As part of the executive branch of the state, it is within the fold of the governor of California's administration. regarding SMMC and MRCA, requesting that those two state offices take action to recover the funds that SMMC improperly used from Proposition 50, the Water Security, Clean Drinking Water drinking water supply of water available to animals for drinking supplied via nipples, in troughs, dams, ponds and larger natural water sources; an insufficient supply leads to dehydration; it can be the source of infection, e.g. leptospirosis, salmonellosis, or of poisoning, e.g. , Coastal and Beach Protection Act of 2002. The Office of Finance agreed that the use of these bond funds "is not a fiscally prudent use of General Obligation bond proceeds" and referred the request to recover taxpayers' funds to the State Attorney General's office. The Attorney General's office, which represents SMMC, declined to act on the demand, stating in its response letter that SMMC had not done anything improper with the bond funds. Under California law, when the Attorney General or the State Department of Finance fails to act on a demand, state taxpayers are allowed to initiate legal action and sue to recover the funds in question. "SMMC's use of Prop 50 Clean Water funds to pay for legal fees to create a Public Works Plan that takes away local planning controls has nothing to do with clean water and violates the spirit and the letter of the law," said Allison Burns, a partner with the law firm Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth in Newport Beach, who represents the plaintiffs. "We are also asking the court to prevent the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy from spending further Prop 50 funds in violation of California law." SMMC's Public Works Plan is opposed by many local governments. Recently, the California Contract Cities Association, which represents 75 cities throughout the state, voted unanimously to oppose it. Critics are concerned that if the California Coastal Commission The California Coastal Commission is a state agency in the U.S. state of California with quasi-judicial regulatory influence over land use and public access in the California coastal zone. approves the Public Works Plan, it would allow SMMC to ignore a city's or county's local planning ordinances on land owned or controlled by SMMC. The plaintiffs want MRCA to return part of the $20 million of funds that SMMC awarded to MRCA under Prop. 50. The money was supposed to be used only for "the protection of the Santa Monica Bay Santa Monica Bay is an arm of the Pacific Ocean in southern California, United States. Its boundaries are slightly ambiguous, but it is generally considered to be the part of the Pacific within an imaginary line drawn between Point Dume and Ventura County coastal watersheds." "The Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy thinks it is no longer accountable to any government oversight agency. But as a California taxpayer, I cannot sit and watch a state agency act like it is above the law with our money," said Robings. The suit also asks the court for a Preliminary Injunction A temporary order made by a court at the request of one party that prevents the other party from pursuing a particular course of conduct until the conclusion of a trial on the merits. A preliminary injunction is regarded as extraordinary relief. and a Permanent Injunction permanent injunction n. a final order of a court that a person or entity refrain from certain activities permanently or take certain actions (usually to correct a nuisance) until completed. to prevent SMMC from illegally spending voter approved bond funds in the future. Allison Burns, plaintiffs' attorney, can be reached at: 949-725-4000. The legal document filed with the Ventura County Superior Court can be viewed at: www.fileshed.com Username: taxpayerlawsuit Password: 123taxpayerlawsuit |
|
||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion