California Court Rules Synopsys and IBM Jointly Own '446 and '438 Patents in Synopsys-Magma Litigation.Major Step toward Dismissal of Infringement Claims SANTA CLARA, Calif. -- Magma[R] Design Automation Inc. (Nasdaq:LAVA) announced that a U.S. District Court today ruled Synopsys Inc. (Nasdaq:SNPS SNPS Space Nuclear Power System ) and IBM (International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk, NY, www.ibm.com) The world's largest computer company. IBM's product lines include the S/390 mainframes (zSeries), AS/400 midrange business systems (iSeries), RS/6000 workstations and servers (pSeries), Intel-based servers (xSeries) (NYSE NYSE See: New York Stock Exchange :IBM) jointly own two of the three patents at issue in the California patent litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute. When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation. between Magma and Synopsys, a decision consistent with the position Magma argued regarding the two patents. The court ruled that the third patent is owned solely by Synopsys. "We are extremely pleased with this ruling," said David Stanley, Magma corporate vice president, Corporate Affairs. "It is a major step toward dismissal of infringement claims with regard to these two patents." The ruling, issued in the U.S. District Court for Northern California, holds that ownership in U.S. Patents 6,453,446 and 6,725,438 (the '446 and '438 patents), is shared by Synopsys and IBM. The court ruled ownership of U.S. Patent 6,378,114 (the '114 patent) belongs solely to Synopsys. "As the facts came to light in this case it became clear that IBM, one of Magma's technology partners, contributed to the technology in these two patents and is therefore a rightful owner," Stanley said. He added that because Magma and IBM granted each other rights to their respective EDA (1) (Electronic Design Automation) Using the computer to design, lay out, verify and simulate the performance of electronic circuits on a chip or printed circuit board. patents in a 2004 licensing agreement, Magma therefore has rights to use the '446 and '438 patents. With regard to the final patent at issue in the case, the '114 patent, Stanley said Magma is confident its products do not practice any of the technology it covers and therefore do not infringe the patent, but that in any case its validity is highly questionable because it is already under reexamination re·ex·am·ine also re-ex·am·ine tr.v. re·ex·am·ined, re·ex·am·in·ing, re·ex·am·ines 1. To examine again or anew; review. 2. Law To question (a witness) again after cross-examination. by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO PTO abbr. 1. Parent Teacher Organization 2. or p.t.o. please turn over 3. power takeoff PTO or pto please turn over Noun 1. ). "In its initial decision the PTO rejected all 15 claims in the '114 patent, and since then we filed another request citing additional prior art," Stanley said. "It's quite possible the '114 patent could be invalidated entirely, resulting in the dismissal of the claims of infringement." This case, which Synopsys filed in 2004, is one of two patent lawsuits between the companies. In the second case, filed by Synopsys in U.S. District Court for Delaware in 2005, Synopsys asserts Magma infringes a Synopsys patent and Magma claims Synopsys infringes four Magma patents. The trial in the Delaware case is scheduled to begin in June 2007. "I think it is by now clear to our industry that litigation such as this consumes far too much time and money, resources that are not helping us help our customers," Stanley said. "We are hopeful we can all adopt a less-litigious posture and focus on developing technology that helps our customers create better chips." Filings, court orders and other documents relevant to these matters are available on the Magma website at www.magma-da.com/PatentLitigation.html. About Magma Magma's software for integrated circuit (IC) design is recognized as embodying the best in semiconductor technology. The world's top chip companies use Magma's EDA software to design and verify complex, high-performance ICs for communications, computing, consumer electronics and networking applications, while at the same time reducing design time and costs. Magma provides software for IC implementation, analysis, physical verification Physical verification A procedure auditors use to ensure that inventory recorded in the book is correct by actually checking out the physical inventory. , characterization and programmable logic design, and the company's integrated RTL-to-GDSII design flow offers "The Fastest Path from RTL (Register Transfer Level) A high-level hardware description language (HDL) for defining digital circuits. The circuits are described as a collection of registers, Boolean equations, control logic such as "if-then-else" statements as well as complex event sequences; to Silicon"[TM]. Magma is headquartered in Santa Clara, Calif. with offices around the world. Magma's stock trades on Nasdaq under the ticker symbol Ticker Symbol An arrangement of characters (usually letters) representing a particular security listed on an exchange or otherwise traded publicly. When a company issues securities to the public marketplace, it selects an available ticker symbol for its securities which investors LAVA. Visit Magma Design Automation Magma Design Automation (NASDAQ: LAVA) is a software company in the electronic design automation (EDA) industry. The company was founded in 1997 and maintains headquarters in San Jose, California. on the Web at www.magma-da.com. Magma is a registered trademark and "The Fastest Path from RTL to Silicon" is a trademark of Magma Design Automation Inc. All other product and company names are trademarks and registered trademarks of their respective companies. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS: Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters set forth in this press release are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA) implemented several significant substantive changes affecting certain cases brought under the federal securities laws, including changes related to pleading, discovery, liability, class representation and awards fees and of 1995. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially, including risks inherent in litigation. Further discussion of these and other potential risk factors may be found in Magma's public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (www.sec.gov). Magma undertakes no additional obligation to update these forward-looking statements. |
|
||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion