Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,467,417 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

California's largest law firm accused of age discrimination.


SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 21, 1995--Pillsbury Madison & Sutro, California's largest law firm, has been charged with intentionally discriminating against its "older employees" in papers to be filed with the State Department of Fair Employment and Housing.

Three long-term secretaries and the firm's director of Human Resources alleged that Pillsbury, which grossed more than $210 million last year, has very consciously plotted to rid the firm of its older secretaries. They assert that the firm first threatened older secretaries with more work and possible firings months before they unveiled a "voluntary" early retirement program.

In documents filed with DFEH DFEH - Department of Fair Employment & Housing
DFEH - Director of Food and Environmental Hygiene (Hong Kong)
 the employees claim that Pillsbury created a paper trail which sets forth its illegal plans. They will prove that Pillsbury wanted to rid itself of its older workers in order to reengineer its staff and minimize the risk of claims of age discrimination. Pillsbury wanted a "Perky" image to more effectively attract clients and accommodate the younger partners.

"It is particularly reprehensible that Pillsbury has engaged in this conduct. They are one of the most prestigious firms in the country representing some of the most politically and economically powerful companies in the world. If they do this type of blatant discrimination in their own house, I can only wonder how they advise their clients," said Frances Pinnock, of San Francisco's West Coast Center for Law and Justice, the firm representing the employees. "I would think that many of their clients will now have to rethink the advice they have received from Pillsbury," she continued.

The secretaries and their attorneys promise that they will expose all of the illegal conduct which Pillsbury has engaged in over the years, including turning their corporate head the other way when money-making partners sexually harass secretaries.

Since the Firm merged in 1991 with a large L.A. firm, they have committed a series of "firings" in order to increase partners' profits and mold the corporate image. Last year each of its 186 partners was paid a record $360,000.

The law office of the West Coast Center for Law and Justice will be available by phone to answer questions and provide more details upon request.

CONTACT: West Coast Center for Law & Justice

Law Offices of Pinnock & Schectman

Steven Schectman, 415/431-6500
COPYRIGHT 1995 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1995, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Feb 21, 1995
Words:375
Previous Article:ROMFIELD BUILDING CORPORATION LIMITED - COMPANY UPDATE.
Next Article:International offering of ASM Lithography shares.
Topics:



Related Articles
Age-discrimination update.
A major change in civil rights litigation.(Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents)
Employee may claim age bias for being `too young'.
Golden Opportunity. (Law).(Class action lawsuit filed against entertainment conglomerates)(Brief Article)
BRIEFLY : FIRED RECRUITS WIN SUITS AGAINST LAPD.(News)
Worker `too old' to receive benefits cannot claim discrimination.
`Younger' workers can sue under ADEA, Sixth Circuit finds.
Liability lowdown: facts about reducing liability when contracting with an AMC. (Association Management Company Directory).
Age bias law can't be used against older workers.(Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)
Age ruling.(September 10-16)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles