Calif. Voucher Scheme Would Cost Billions, New Report Charges.A new study has concluded that a voucher proposal on the ballot in California would cost the state $3 billion to subsidize tuition for wealthy parents whose children already attend private schools. The study, conducted by Policy Analysis for California Education, charged that the voucher plan would disproportionately aid the rich. "It's essentially tax relief for the well-off," said Luis Huerta, the study's co-author. The California proposal would give a $4,000 voucher to WARRANTY, VOUCHER TO, practice. A warranty is a contract real, annexed to lands and tenements, whereby a man is bound to defend such lands and tenements from another person; and in case of eviction by title paramount, to give him lands of equal value. 2. any parent in the state with school-aged children who requested it. There is no income cap, which means wealthy parents would qualify alongside poor families. The scheme was devised by Timothy Draper, a Silicon Valley multi-millionaire and anti-public school activist, who spent millions of his own money to get it on the ballot and promote it. Polls show Draper's Proposition 38 lagging in support, leaving its backers to adopt unorthodox strategies to win favor. Recently they began offering prizes, including Hawaiian vacations, $2,000 shopping sprees and computers, to people who refer the greatest number of new supporters to the effort. Education Week reported that the initiative's website also features a sweepstakes drawing. Michigan also faces a voucher referendum this year. Proposition 1 is much less ambitious than the California proposal and would offer vouchers worth $3,300 to parents whose children are in public schools that fail to graduate at least two-thirds of their high school students within four years. A poll released in mid September showed the measure ahead, with 42 percent backing it and 31 percent opposed. Twenty-seven percent were undecided. Americans United and its allies are working in both states to educate voters about the dangers of voucher schemes. In other news about vouchers: * A Florida appellate court A court having jurisdiction to review decisions of a trial-level or other lower court. An unsuccessful party in a lawsuit must file an appeal with an appellate court in order to have the decision reviewed. has upheld the state's controversial voucher program. The three-judge panel of the First District Court of Appeals in Tallahassee ruled unanimously Oct. 3 that the program does not violate a provision in the state constitution requiring the state to provide a "uniform, efficient, safe, secure and high-quality system of free public schools." The program was pushed through the Florida legislature The Florida Legislature is the state legislature of the U.S. state of Florida. The Florida Constitution mandates a bicameral state legislature with an upper house Florida Senate of 40 members and a lower Florida House of Representatives of 120 members. by Gov. Jeb Bush last year. It currently serves about 51 students in Pensacola. Americans United, the NAACP NAACP in full National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Oldest and largest U.S. civil rights organization. It was founded in 1909 to secure political, educational, social, and economic equality for African Americans; W.E.B. Du Bois and Ida B. , the ACLU ACLU: see American Civil Liberties Union. , the PTA PTA or parent-teacher association: see parent education. and other education groups sponsoring the litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute. When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation. plan to appeal the ruling to the Florida Supreme Court. If that fails, the groups plan to challenge the program on other state constitutional grounds, including the separation of church and state
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion