Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,604,538 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

CalSTRS Tells SEC its Proposed Rules Ignore Shareholder Interests.


SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- The nation's second-largest public pension fund today told the Securities and Exchange Commission its proposed rules for increasing shareholders' ability to nominate nom·i·nate  
tr.v. nom·i·nat·ed, nom·i·nat·ing, nom·i·nates
1. To propose by name as a candidate, especially for election.

2. To designate or appoint to an office, responsibility, or honor.
 and elect directors are counterproductive coun·ter·pro·duc·tive  
adj.
Tending to hinder rather than serve one's purpose: "Violation of the court order would be counterproductive" Philip H. Lee.
.

The proposed SEC rules, S7-16-07 and S7-17-07, out for public comment through October 2, address the ability of shareholders to nominate directors for election to corporate boards utilizing the company's proxy materials Proxy Materials

Documents regulated by the Securities & Exchange Commission in which a public company outlines its methods and procedures. These documents are used to inform shareholders and solicit votes for corporate decisions, such as the election of directors and other
.

In a letter sent to the SEC today, Jack Ehnes, CalSTRS Chief Executive Officer, criticized the SEC for proposed rules that "reveal an agency that has thrown overboard o·ver·board  
adv.
Over or as if over the side of a boat or ship.

Idiom:
go overboard
To go to extremes, especially as a result of enthusiasm.
 its mission to serve investors and has adopted instead a policy of promoting the interests of corporate management at the expense of shareholders..."

Ehnes' letter cites CalSTRS' strong support of greater communication between boards, executives and shareholders and that "this increased communication should be permitted with only the bare minimum of restrictions. In this regard, both proposed rules are counterproductive."

The letter states proposed rule S7-16-07 "would permit 'proxy access' proposals under a very limited set of circumstances CIRCUMSTANCES, evidence. The particulars which accompany a fact.
     2. The facts proved are either possible or impossible, ordinary and probable, or extraordinary and improbable, recent or ancient; they may have happened near us, or afar off; they are public or
....CalSTRS believes the combination of a high ownership threshold and onerous on·er·ous  
adj.
1. Troublesome or oppressive; burdensome. See Synonyms at burdensome.

2. Law Entailing obligations that exceed advantages.
 disclosure requirements effectively gut the usefulness of the proposal." Competing proposed rule S7-17-07 "would expressly forbid for·bid  
tr.v. for·bade or for·bad , for·bid·den or for·bid, for·bid·ding, for·bids
1. To command (someone) not to do something: I forbid you to go.

2.
 shareholders from making any proposal that would advocate the adoption of 'proxy access' procedures for any company."

CalSTRS' letter urges the SEC to reject summarily the proposed rules and offers recommendations for new rules that would increase shareholder democracy to strengthen the value of the company.

With a $169 billion investment portfolio, the California State Teachers' Retirement System is the second-largest public pension fund in the U.S. It administers retirement, disability and survivor benefits for California's 795,000 public school educators and their families from the state's 1,400 school districts, county offices of education and community college districts.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Oct 2, 2007
Words:294
Previous Article:USEC Inc. Statement on News Reports Regarding D&D Proposal.
Next Article:International Rectifier Outlines Key Internal Initiatives.
Topics:



Related Articles
Leveling the field.
"What's in a name?" wrote Shakespeare more than 400 years ago. Well, just as the names Capulet and Montague made all the difference between life and...
Best care everywhere: here's an idea: a civilian VA for the uninsured, and maybe the rest of us.
TEI comments on tangibles regs, Form 5471, and section 263 transaction costs: also Files Amicus Brief in MeadWestvaco.
Proposed regulations on entertainment use of company aircraft: still a tough IRS line, but notice 2005-45 is eased.
The new DCL regulations: new rules and contracts.
Supplemental comments on the proposed "Tangibles Regulations".
Brief of Tax Executives Institute, Inc. as amicus curiae: on July 18, 2007 Tax Executives Institute filed this brief with the Supreme Court of the...
Proposed revision of Form 5471.
TEI member comments on Form 5471: July 2007.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles