Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,488,987 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

COURT STRIKES DOWN FTB PROVISION.


The U.S. Supreme Court recently decided in Hunt-Wesson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board of California that California's limitations on interest expense deductions violate the U.S. Constitution's Due Process and Commerce Clauses.

California's rule for calculating "unitary" income permits the interest expense deduction to nondomiciliary corporations only to the extent that it exceeds out-of-state income, thus allowing tax on income which the state could not otherwise tax.

The court held that by offsetting or disallowing legitimate deductions where there is no relationship between the disallowed expense and exempt income
Exempt Income
Certain types of income that are not subject to income tax.

Notes:
Examples of exempt income include: gifts under $10,000, death benefits, health benefits, and some scholarships.
See also: Exemption
, California, in effect, indirectly taxed income it could not tax directly.
COPYRIGHT 2000 California Society of Certified Public Accountants
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2000, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:California Franchise Tax Board
Publication:California CPA
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jul 1, 2000
Words:101
Previous Article:YOU TELL US.
Next Article:E-FILE GROWTH.(more people filing taxes online)(Brief Article)(Statistical Data Included)
Topics:



Related Articles
The questionable constitutionality of the California DRD and interest offset rules. (dividends-received deductions)
Constitutionality of California's interest offset rule.
California interest-offset rule is discriminatory and should be struck down, TEI urges Supreme Court.(friend-of-the-court brief filed by Tax...
Hunt-Wesson, Inc. Petitioner, v. Franchise Tax Board, Respondent.(friend-of-the-court brief filed by Tax Executives Institute with the U.S. Supreme...
Brief of Tax Executives Institute, Inc. as amicus curie in support of petitioner.(California interest-offset taxation)
California insurance company DRD provision ruled unconstitutional. (dividends-received deduction)
Under scrutiny.(Tax Shelters; Franchise Tax Board)
California's water's-edge taxation of international businesses: 2003 Update.
Amicus curiae brief on behalf of Tax Executive Institute, Inc. in support of plaintiffs-appellants.(California)
The redemption of equitable apportionment.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles