Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,607,059 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

CLSI Publishes Guideline for Verification of Comparability of Patient Results Within One Health Care System.


WAYNE, Pa. -- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute has recently published a new document, Verification of Comparability of Patient Results Within One Health Care System; Approved Guideline (C54-A), which provides guidance on how to verify comparability of quantitative laboratory results for individual patients within a health care system. Patients may get laboratory testing at multiple locations within a health care system. Comparable results within this health care system, using the different measurement systems, and/or multiple instruments within one location (eg, backup instruments, point-of-care [POC (Proof Of Concept) See PoC exploit.

POC - Point Of Contact
] instruments) are necessary to provide optimal patient care. The document reviews the salient issues surrounding verification of comparability of patient results among measurement procedures, and provides a practical, statistically valid approach that laboratories of varying size and resources can use to satisfy this quality requirement.

Christopher M. Lehman, MD, University of Utah The University of Utah (also The U or the U of U or the UU), located in Salt Lake City, is the flagship public research university in the state of Utah, and one of 10 institutions that make up the Utah System of Higher Education.  Health Sciences Center and Chairholder of the subcommittee that developed the document says, "Laboratories struggle with finding a balance between statistical validity and resource utilization when designing comparability experiments. C54-A provides an intuitive, streamlined, statistically valid approach for evaluating instrument or assay comparability that minimizes the number of patient samples required for comparison testing."

The document provides a simple approach for the assessment of patient laboratory result comparability across a maximum of 10 instruments. It assumes that a more comprehensive validation of quantitative measurement system comparability was undertaken when the measurement systems were initially introduced into the laboratory. The approach described can also be used to verify comparability of patients' results in situations following reagent reagent /re·a·gent/ (re-a´jent) a substance used to produce a chemical reaction so as to detect, measure, produce, etc., other substances.

re·a·gent
n.
 or calibrator calibrator

an instrument for dilating a tubular structure or for determining the caliber of such a structure.
 lot changes, instrument component changes or maintenance procedures, alerts from quality control (QC) or external quality assessment (EQA EQA European Quality Award (European Foundation for Quality Management)
EQA External Quality Assessment
EqA Equivalent Average (baseball statistic)
EQA Environmental Quality Act
) (proficiency testing proficiency test nprueba de capacitación  [PT]) events, or other special cause event.

This document defines a health care system as a system of physician offices, clinics, hospitals, and reference laboratories, under one administrative entity, where a patient may present for laboratory testing, and whose results may be reviewed by any health care provider within the system for the purpose of providing medical care.

For additional information on CLSI CLSI Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (Wayne, PA)
CLSI Cisco Link Services Interface
 or for further information regarding this release, visit the CLSI website at www.clsi.org or call +610.688.0100.

CLSI, formerly NCCLS NCCLS National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards , is a global, nonprofit A corporation or an association that conducts business for the benefit of the general public without shareholders and without a profit motive.

Nonprofits are also called not-for-profit corporations. Nonprofit corporations are created according to state law.
, membership-based organization dedicated to developing standards and guidelines for the health care and medical testing community. CLSI's unique consensus process facilitates the creation of standards and guidelines that are reliable, practical, and achievable for an effective quality system.
COPYRIGHT 2008 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Jun 11, 2008
Words:401
Previous Article:Independent Audit Expands 2008 CES Attendance to More Than 141,000.
Next Article:Corporate Meetings & Incentives Names Top 20 "Changemakers" in the Meetings Industry.
Topics:



Related Articles
A dozen benefits from the managed care movement. (Managed Care on Trial).
7 critical steps to implementing clinical guidelines.
Drawing blood gases in vacuum tubes.
EQC's future sparks continued dialogue.
Interlinking processes and procedures: new guideline for development and control of lab documents.
CLSI evaluation protocols.
Will big brother save healthcare?
Full disclosure of medical errors to patients is becoming more and more transparent.
Answering your questions.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles